Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Schools

Department X
Ministry of Justice
Member X
Lord Garnier

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Garnier, Lord (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, there have been two things which were splendid. First of all were the intentions behind the proposals of my noble friend Lord Blencathra, and secondly, the content and tone of the speech of my noble friend Lord Hailsham. It seems to me that my noble friend Lord Blencathra...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c857
House
House of Lords

There we are. Perhaps in the spirit of compromise, I suggest that the answer to this is a sentencing question. My noble friend Lord Blencathra pointed out that, in some of the particularly nasty cases he referred to, very lengthy sentences were awarded for the people who committed these crimes...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c857
House
House of Lords

Does my hon. Friend agree that the Government’s arguments stand at odds with our own experience? There have been a number of cases since 1998 where patients or patients’ families, or those supporting patients, have sued the NHS, in whichever guise it happens to be, in relation to the giving...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c670-1
House
House of Commons

I do not want to have an argument with the hon. Gentleman about the numbers. We are seeing self-inflicted deaths at the rate of more than six a month now. If one looks at the figures over the last 10 years, there was a dip in the early 2000s, but,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c685-6
House
House of Commons

I suspect that it probably will. While I take on board the hon. Gentleman’s assertion that my argument is marginally off-beam, given that the Bill provides for a post-event criminal procedure, I suggest that the Bill could none the less provide a deterrent through an anticipatory effect. The Minister argued—it...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c686-8
House
House of Commons

I fully appreciate what the right hon. Member for Southampton, Itchen (Mr. Denham) has said about his motives for supporting the Government in resisting the Lords amendment. I also accept that politics is largely a game of compromise, and that the best is very often the enemy of the good....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c683-5
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister tell the House why the argument that he is putting forward is not in conflict with his Government’s policy of introducing the Human Rights Act 1998?

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

If the Minister is right in his expectations, there probably will not be any prosecutions.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667
House
House of Commons

During the passage of the Human Rights Bill in this House—the Minister may well have taken part in those debates; I certainly did—it was pointed out to the Government that passing the Act would lead to foreseeable and obvious constitutional collision points between the courts and the Government. That is...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

Can I press the Minister further on that?

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons