Skip to main content

1-20 of 992 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Exiting the European Union
Subject X
Parliamentary scrutiny

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Department for Exiting the European Union (992)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Parliamentary scrutiny (992)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, like the noble Lord, Lord Armstrong, I have not spoken in the European debates. I had rather hoped that the Attorney-General would provide an opportunity this afternoon to talk about reconciliation and renewal, but instead we have a degree of delay and rancour, and, as my noble friend...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc876-8
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of further developments in discussions with the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. Agreed to on question. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Callanan
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Debates
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc837-864
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of further developments in discussions with the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. Agreed to on question. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Callanan
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Debates
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc869-906
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this debate allows us the opportunity to debate further the discussions with the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. This House has played a significant role in shaping the process for the UK’s exit from the EU and will continue to do so....

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc837-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are two preliminary issues. First, why am I standing here? The answer is that because we were promised some legal changes to the withdrawal agreement. We have seen in the newspapers stories about the peregrinations of

Attorney-General Geoffrey Cox going to Brussels and putting forward new texts,...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc838-9
House
House of Lords

Let me be clear: that is not an attack on the Irish—quite the contrary. It is just that the Government have not yet confirmed where the Prime Minister is going—at least, not before I entered the Chamber. Before noble Lords get the wrong idea, when I said “deus ex machina”...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc839-840
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the reason given for having the debate today—the 12th on the Government’s withdrawal agreement with the EU and the political declaration—was so that we could debate the proposal that the Government were putting to a meaningful vote in the Commons tomorrow and express a view on it. We...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc840-2
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has been very frank about that. The purpose of having a people’s vote, as he describes it, is nothing to do with consulting the people as far as he is concerned; it is to reverse the decision of the people. The noble Lord and all his colleagues—I...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c842
House
House of Lords

My Lords, every time I make this speech, the noble Lord stands up and asks me the same question.

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c842
House
House of Lords

I do not.

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c842
House
House of Lords

He does. He may not have been listening, but I have said that, if the people decided in a further referendum that they wished to leave the EU, we would respect that decision. Would we go through the Lobbies with anything other than a very heavy heart? No, we would...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc842-3
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is being very honest about his position, and I respect that. Will he tell the House what question he would prefer to be put in the second referendum that he wishes to hold in order to overturn the first one?

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c843
House
House of Lords

The logical question. The Government have a deal which they say is in the best interests of the country. We do not believe that it is in the best interests of the country. That is the logical choice to make. I suspect that there will be debates on exactly what...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c843
House
House of Lords

My Lords, now we move to the calmer waters of the Cross Benches. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Goldsmith, had his analogy, and I have mine. When I last attempted to speak in one of these debates I was in the air. I was in a holding pattern, metaphorically...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc843-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start with an apology, as my remarks are grouped around three of the most irritating phrases in the English language: “I told you so”; “I would not have started from here”; and—a newcomer that the noble and learned Lord just mentioned—“Nothing has changed”.

I shall start with “I...

Member
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc845-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an honour to follow the noble Lord, Lord Bridges, with his unique insight into the processes which have been going on. However, I hope his drastic solution will not have to come about.

I have spared your Lordships a speech in our two most recent Brexit debates,...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc847-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, will forgive me if I resist the temptation to turn this debate into one on the BBC.

In the debate that took place in your Lordships’ House on 27 February, my noble friend the Duke of Wellington, who is of course in...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc848-850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, faced with our likely imminent departure from the European Union, I feel alarmed and concerned about our country’s future. But I should say, too, that I feel great personal sadness as 40 years ago this year, at the beginning of my political life, I was elected to the...

Member
Baroness Quin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc850-1
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. Does she not agree that, if the solution were to continue free trade with our friends in the European Union, as we do at the moment, the problems to which she refers will not arise?

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 c851
House
House of Lords

By far the best way forward would be not to leave the European Union, so that we would continue to benefit from the very good deal we have at present. I am also astonished that industry and the trade unions are being so little heeded at present, and dismissed as...

Member
Baroness Quin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2019
Reference
796 cc851-2
House
House of Lords