Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,070 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Exiting the European Union
Subject X
Environment protection

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Department for Exiting the European Union (1,070)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Environment protection (1,070)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the noble Baronesses, Lady Ludford and Lady Jones, and the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, for adding their names to this amendment. If passed, it would require the Government to bring forward versions of the Brexit legislation published but not passed during the last two parliamentary sessions.

During...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2020
Reference
801 cc770-1
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2020
Reference
669 c492
House
House of Commons

House resolved itself into a Committee. Committee stage. Amendment 19 to clause 1, discussed with other amendments, clauses 1 to 5 stand part, new clause 1 and new schedule 2, debated and negatived on division (65 to 495). Clauses 1 to 5 order to stand part of the Bill, with...

Lead member
Richard Graham
Answering member
Steve Barclay
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 cc269-285
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Sir Lindsay. We are about to debate in Committee, under your chairmanship, amendments that are not available to Members. I have just been to the Vote Office to try to find the amendments. [ Interruption. ] They have become available now, but they were not...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c251
House
House of Commons

Possibly.

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c251
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 19, in clause 1, page 1, line 3, leave out subsections (1) to (3) and insert—

‘(1A) After this Act has been passed, but no later than 21 October 2019, the Prime Minister of State must make arrangements for—

(a) motion to the effect that the House...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c270
House
House of Commons

I rise to seek colleagues’ patience in proposing something that I believe is a compromise that many Members in this House have long sought and many people have expressed support for. The compromise goes like this. There are many of us on both sides of this House who do not...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 cc253-271
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman’s amendment mentions our having a motion of the House. The last time we had a withdrawal agreement motion, we had five days of debate. Is there sufficient time to have five days of debate before 31 October, if we pass his amendment?

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c271
House
House of Commons

The short answer to that is almost certainly no. However, we have had not just five days of debate, but weeks and months and years of debate on these issues. The previous deal, which I regarded as a good deal, was debated ad infinitum in this House. I do not...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c271
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says that he regarded that deal as a good deal. However, a very large number of Members in this House do not regard it as a good deal. His amendment, proposed in the way it is, seems to suggest that this is a binary choice. It is...

Member
Sandy Martin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c255
House
House of Commons

I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point of view. There are 650 Members of this House, all of whom, if we designed the perfect deal ourselves individually, would have differences from each other. However, we are at the stage where I believe the vast majority of people in this country want...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c255
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman’s amendment is of course predicated on the Prime Minister actually negotiating a new deal. What evidence does he have, because I cannot see any, of there even being a negotiating team in place, as the 30 days evaporate like snow off a dyke? Can he show us...

Member
Neil Gray (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c255
House
House of Commons

In fact, the hon. Gentleman misreads part of the point of my amendment, which is not to prejudge whether or not the Prime Minister and this Government come back with a deal. I believe the Government are genuinely trying to get a deal, but it is perfectly possible either that...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c255
House
House of Commons

Surely, the withdrawal agreement was rejected on the three times that it came to the House, and the backstop was a clear issue on each of those three times. If that continues to be the case, would the hon. Gentleman still insist on pushing for a withdrawal agreement that insists...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 cc255-6
House
House of Commons

My amendment suggests that there are three options for this House to vote for on Monday 21 October. The first is the withdrawal agreement as it was presented to the House previously. The second is the withdrawal agreement plus the cross-party agreement that was reached, but was never voted on...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is coming up with such sensible provisions. Does he agree that this would smoke out those who claim to want to avoid no deal but, truth be told, vote against every route to avoid it? This would smoke them out. If they vote for this, they will...

Member
Alex Chalk (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons

My constituency neighbour is absolutely right, but my aim is not so much to smoke out—to use his phrase—the motives and underlying thoughts of colleagues across this House, but to give all of us the opportunity to say, ultimately, what we really prefer: is it a deal or is it...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for the thoughtful way in which he is setting out his case. He and I both just voted against the principle of this Bill on Second Reading, largely because we want the Prime Minister to have the strongest possible hand in his negotiations with the...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very good point. One reason I drafted this very short amendment in the way that I did, with the help of the Clerks, was precisely not to take away the pads or gloves of the Government’s batsmen when they go into negotiations with the European...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his brilliant contribution in bringing forward this amendment. I voted for the withdrawal agreement. I was proud to do so, because the only way to stop no deal is to vote for a deal. I hope and expect that our new Prime Minister will...

Member
Neil O'Brien (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
664 c256
House
House of Commons