Skip to main content

1-20 of 144 results for subject:"Medical equipment"

Department X
Department for International Trade

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Department for International Trade (144)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what assessment she has made of the (a) outcome of the most recent discussion at the World Trade Organisation on a comprehensive temporary waiver on the provisions of the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement and (b) implications for her policies...

Asked by
Gareth Thomas (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 June 2022
Reference
11541
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what assessment has been made of supporting a temporary waiver that includes all forms of intellectual property, including (a) medical tools, (b) treatments and (c) diagnostics on TRIPS at the WTO.

Asked by
Stephen Farry (Alliance)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 April 2022
Reference
150289
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what the Government’s position is on the proposed WTO Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights waiver in response to the covid-19 pandemic and allowing countries to use it in their domestic context.

Asked by
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
143002
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to introduce export licensing controls for equipment used for the removal, freezing, or transportation, of organs to countries where there have been credible reports of forced organ harvesting.

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for International Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 January 2021
Reference
HL11718
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 1 I shall also speak to Amendments 4 and 5. The purpose of these amendments is to provide a legal basis for the Government to bring forward a statutory instrument to ratify the Luxembourg Rail Protocol. Noble Lords will probably remember that I spoke about...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc966-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise primarily to support the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, as I did in Committee, in his efforts to get the Luxembourg Rail Protocol to the Cape Town Convention implemented in the UK. As we have heard, some steps have been

taken, thanks to the good offices of...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc967-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, and the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe, in utter frustration. The Luxembourg Rail Protocol was adopted at a diplomatic conference in 2007 and is due to come into force in 2021 because enough countries will have ratified it by then to create...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c969
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on the substance of this amendment, I have very little to add to the excellent speeches that we have already heard from my noble friend Lord Berkeley and the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe, with additional support from the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer. As my noble friend Lord Berkeley...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn to Amendments 1, 4 and 5, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. I acknowledge without reservation how much this topic means to him; no one could have worked more assiduously than he has on it.

The amendments before us would expand the scope of the Clause...

Member
Lord Grimstone of Boscobel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc970-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to all noble Lords who spoke and to the noble Baronesses, Lady Neville-Rolfe and Lady Kramer, and my noble friend Lord Stevenson for their support. I am grateful to the Minister for his response, courtesy and offer of further support.

We have not moved very...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c971
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to speak on Report and, in particular, to speak to and move Amendment 2 and speak to Amendment 3. I would like to think that the amendments are fairly self-explanatory but, effectively, they both seek to

“limit the application of delegated powers to the ‘roll-over’ of...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc972-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure, as always, to follow the noble Baroness. I have a great deal of sympathy with the intention behind these amendments, which also relate to the fact that, from January onwards, the Bill will have to operate for agreements it was never intended to implement....

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc973-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh of Pickering, for raising this issue and, through her, to the Law Society of Scotland for reminding noble Lords of some of the detailed points which we often ignore when we put down amendments, particularly at this stage of...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c974
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn to Amendments 2 and 3, tabled by my noble friend Lady McIntosh of Pickering, which seek to restrict the Clause 2 power so that it can only be used to implement agreements which are “wholly or substantially similar” to previous EU agreements. I can assure noble...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc974-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Berkeley

1: Clause 2, page 2, line 14, at end insert—

“(c) an international treaty or private law convention (including any amendment or protocol thereto) that facilitates trade or the financing thereof.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and the amendments in the name of Lord Berkeley to page 2, line 23 and...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c966
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness McIntosh of Pickering

2: Clause 2, page 2, line 18, at end insert “and where the new agreement is in wholly or substantially similar terms to that between the partner country and the EU.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would limit the application of delegated powers to the “roll-over” of existing...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c972
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendments to clause 2 debated and withdrawn. New clause, after clause 2, agreed to on division (308 votes to 261). New clause, after clause 2, disagreed to. New clause, after clause 2, agreed to on division (297 votes to 221). New clause, after clause 2,...

Lead member
Viscount Younger of Leckie; Lord Grimstone of Boscobel
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc965-1103
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, and congratulate her on her excellent and persuasive speech. I am pleased to contribute to consideration on Report of the Trade Bill and to speak to the new Amendment 11.

There is some question as to the status of...

Member
Lord Freyberg (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1093-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak in favour of Amendment 9. In doing so, I return to an issue that I have raised in your Lordships’ House on numerous occasions. Recently, in the context of the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill, I spoke about the use of Uighur slave labour...

Member
Baroness Cox (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1080-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an honour to follow so many powerful speeches supporting this ground-breaking amendment, particularly that of my noble friend Lady Cox just now. We are 72 years on from the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, yet we still fail to...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1081-2
House
House of Lords