Skip to main content

1-20 of 181 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for International Trade
Subject X
Economic growth

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Economic growth (181)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion this House has considered potential future free trade agreements: Australia, New Zealand, US and a comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Liam Fox
Answering member
Barry Gardiner; Graham Stuart; Bill Esterson
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Debates
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1618-1690
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1620
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1624
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1627
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1660
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered potential future free trade agreements: Australia, New Zealand, US and a comprehensive and progressive agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.

It is a pleasure to open the debate on Britain’s potential future free trade agreements as an independent trading nation outside the European Union. The...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1619
House
House of Commons

Numerous constituents have contacted me, very concerned about the future of our national health service. If we are to have all these trade deals around the world, can the Secretary of State guarantee that we will never open up our healthcare market to private firms that would deeply damage our...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1619
House
House of Commons

I have read a number of representations from a number of organisations, particularly in relation to investor-state dispute settlements on matters such as healthcare, but let me say first that the ISDS system does not and cannot force the privatisation of any public services, and under current UK and EU...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1619-1620
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for that clarification. He has made it abundantly clear that the privatisation threat to our health services lies not with trade deals from which we can be fully protected but from his own Government’s privatisation agenda, which is still ongoing.

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1620
House
House of Commons

While I clearly reject the latter part of what the right hon. Gentleman has said, the rest of it is very important. Trade agreements make it very clear that it is up to the elected Government of the United Kingdom to determine what they do with public services. The matter...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1620
House
House of Commons

I will make some progress. I will give way again shortly.

New opportunities are clearly available to the United Kingdom, and seeking them will demand some of the agility that is required to respond to the potentially seismic shifts that are taking place in the world economy. The United Kingdom will...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1620-1
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State is right to refer to the emerging middle class in growing economies—India is one example—but can he give me a cast-iron guarantee that when he is negotiating these trade agreements, human rights and issues such as freedom of religion and belief will be at the forefront...

Member
David Linden (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1621
House
House of Commons

The importance that the UK ascribes to human rights is extremely well documented in the range of Departments that are involved. The Government do not intend to seek any watering down of concepts of human rights, although it is very reasonable for us to have different provisions in countries such...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1621
House
House of Commons

Does the Secretary of State expect the beneficial arrangements that the European Union has made with developing countries to be maintained in the deals that his Department will negotiate?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1621
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman, who takes an interest in these issues, for his intervention. Not only would I like to see those maintained, but I would like to see us use our greater freedom to enhance them. For example, I would like to see a greater...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1621
House
House of Commons

We have already shown that we are very capable of getting contracts, for instance, as the Secretary of State knows and as I saw from direct involvement, with China in terms of the

agri-food sector in Northern Ireland. We have a £200 million contract over four years, which is an...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1621
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes several interesting points, and of course not all of the improved openings will come from former bilateral free trade agreements. The case he makes about opening up the dairy sector in China, which as he correctly suggests is worth about a quarter of a billion pounds...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1622
House
House of Commons

On scrutiny and transparency, can my right hon. Friend confirm that the legal protections for our NHS that were built into the EU-Canada deal will be replicated in any future UK trade agreement and that, if there is ever a dispute with investors, it would be resolved in a transparent...

Member
Vicky Ford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1622
House
House of Commons

The UK as well as the EU have been at the forefront of improving the investor-state dispute settlement system and its transparency; in particular we supported the UNCITRAL—United Nations Commission on International Trade Law—rules on transparency that became effective in 2014. We have always seen this as being a necessary...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 cc1622-3
House
House of Commons

But surely Team EU collectively, with Britain in it, would have much more negotiating leverage against those very large emerging markets. An extreme example would be China. We are dwarfed by China but, as the EU, we can negotiate the best deal. The EU is negotiating deals with Singapore, Japan...

Member
Geraint Davies (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2019
Reference
654 c1623
House
House of Commons