Skip to main content

1-20 of 244 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Leader of the House of Commons
Subject X
Wales

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Leader of the House of Commons (244)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Wales (244)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No, I will not give way because of the lack of time. That is one of the issues that is at the heart of tonight's debate. We have an opportunity to do something to respond to those views. The Minister's response has been appalling. The Minister spent half of his...

Member
Gordon Marsden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c262
House
House of Commons

Yes, the board will be there to address policy issues such as those that my right hon. Friend mentioned. It is important to keep in mind that the position of chief coroner would have had power over none of those. The ministerial board will meet quarterly, with the dates fixed...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c259-60
House
House of Commons

I can get back to my hon. Friend on that. I will write to him. I do not have the figures to hand. I note the concerns that hon. Members have raised about the establishment and running costs, which are of course drawn from the original impact assessment prepared by...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c260-1
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister tell me how much his Department spent on consultants in the past year?

Member
Andrew Percy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c260
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Charlie Elphicke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c262
House
House of Commons

I want to place on record, adding to what has been said already, my admiration for the speech of the hon. Member for Brigg and Goole (Andrew Percy). I speak as one of the Members of Parliament for Blackpool, a town which has had a strong focus on service issues...

Member
Gordon Marsden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c261-2
House
House of Commons

We would expect that to be the situation because we would expect the Lord Chief Justice, who would be responsible for the judicial aspects, to appoint someone, but that would be within current costings. I should also say, because this was raised by the hon. Gentleman's right hon. Friend the...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c260
House
House of Commons

I am listening carefully because I, like others, need some persuasion. Why would it not be possible, compatible with all the other arrangements that the Minister is setting out, for one coroner to be designated as the chief coroner, to have the same sort of responsibility for the coronial service...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c260
House
House of Commons

I am very pleased to be able to defend the Youth Justice Board, which was established by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, for which I had responsibility as Minister of State, Home Office. The Act is widely respected as a practical and effective piece of legislation, which also established...

Member
Alun Michael (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c224-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Alun Michael (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c223
House
House of Commons

I am conscious that we have still to debate the Youth Justice Board and S4C, so I will not detain the House unnecessarily. However, I should like to respond to the Minister's comments on the new clauses and his comments on the Commission for Rural Communities. New clauses 8 and...

Member
Andrew George (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c223
House
House of Commons

The House will have heard the hon. Lady's apology. If new clauses 8 and 9 were agreed to, we would create two new statutory bodies, an office of rural affairs and a rural advocate, both of which would be responsible for exercising the advocacy, advice and watchdog functions currently undertaken...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c222-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for giving way. I want to apologise for misleading the House earlier. The total loss to agricultural workers is in fact £93 million over 10 years.

Member
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c222
House
House of Commons

I am happy to debate that matter with the hon. Lady outside. [Interruption.] I do not have the document to hand and I am not in a position to dispute the point. I certainly do not wish to be responsible for misleading the House. On the second part of this...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c222
House
House of Commons

I have seen a DEFRA impact assessment, which says that the cumulative impact of holiday pay and reductions in sick pay is £90 million over 10 years, which is where the £9 million a year net present value comes from. I am happy to send the Minister that document if...

Member
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c221
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is mixing his figures. Nobody is disputing £270,000-odd as the annual cost of running the board. That is not the reason for abolishing it. The purpose of abolition, as we have tried to say, is to release the industry and free it up to increase employment opportunities.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c221
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister telling the House that the measure will cost workers £9 million, when the AWB cost only £270,000, to quote the figures read out at the other end of the Chamber?

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c221
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend, and I also agree with the hon. Gentleman, as his peroration was, in fact, an argument in favour of our amendment, not his new clause. I therefore say to him that he should by all means press his new clause to a Division, as...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c211
House
House of Commons

The purpose of my new clause is to achieve the Government objective of saving money by doing away with unnecessary quangos and other NDPBs, while also retaining the protections for agricultural workers. It therefore achieves exactly the same outcome as the hon. Gentleman is claiming to want, while also saving...

Member
Andrew George (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c211
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman's comments highlight the difference between our positions, as I do not think his new clause does anything of the sort. Instead, it weakens and threatens not only pay, but all the other terms and conditions of service that should be protected. His proposal is not an absolute...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c212
House
House of Commons