Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Leader of the House of Commons
Member X
James Paice

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Paice, James (18)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The House will have heard the hon. Lady's apology. If new clauses 8 and 9 were agreed to, we would create two new statutory bodies, an office of rural affairs and a rural advocate, both of which would be responsible for exercising the advocacy, advice and watchdog functions currently undertaken...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c222-3
House
House of Commons

I am happy to debate that matter with the hon. Lady outside. [Interruption.] I do not have the document to hand and I am not in a position to dispute the point. I certainly do not wish to be responsible for misleading the House. On the second part of this...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c222
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is mixing his figures. Nobody is disputing £270,000-odd as the annual cost of running the board. That is not the reason for abolishing it. The purpose of abolition, as we have tried to say, is to release the industry and free it up to increase employment opportunities.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c221
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c206
House
House of Commons

Clearly, the worker will negotiate with his putative new employer. [Interruption.] I will be more objective: the real world says that that worker is unlikely to move to someone who will pay him less than the job that he is leaving. That is the reality.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c218
House
House of Commons

No; I will make some progress. I, too, heard the right hon. Member for Cardiff South and Penarth (Alun Michael).

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c219
House
House of Commons

For once, I agree with whoever is shouting from a sedentary position. Of course no Minister can guarantee such things and it would be crazy for anybody to do that, but it is our firm belief that the overall employment situation in agriculture and in the fresh food sector will...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c220-1
House
House of Commons

It will not necessarily go down; it will react to the state of affairs.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c219
House
House of Commons

Anyone in a post at the moment is protected by their contract of employment. Anyone who changes jobs—and whose contract therefore is no longer valid—will have to negotiate, just like in any other sector of the economy, and the hon. Gentleman was part of the Government who did not change...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c219
House
House of Commons

I will give way, but I will make a little progress first. I need to emphasise that this is not some secretive plot, as some people would suggest—[Interruption]—or even an open one. Let us not be pedantic. It is not some plot to drive down wages or conditions for agricultural...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c218-9
House
House of Commons

All workers will have exactly the same entitlements as they currently have. Other hon. Members have made the point—I was going to make it later, but I emphasise it now, because there are a lot of myths about—that the Bill will not affect anyone in their current employment. They will...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c218
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the hon. Gentleman because I respect his integrity and his contribution on these issues in the past, although I did not agree with everything that he said. As the hon. Members for St Ives (Andrew George) and for North Durham (Mr Jones) said, new clause...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c217-8
House
House of Commons

The market is what will affect wages. That is the reality of how wages are set in every other—[Interruption.] The hon. Member for Harrow West and the hon. Gentleman told us everything that happened after the abolition of the other wages councils and boards. I would take much more seriously...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c217
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman knows full well that that is not what I said. This group of amendments deals with not only the Agricultural Wages Board, but the Commission for Rural Communities.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c217
House
House of Commons

We have had a number of speeches on these new clauses and amendments which I shall try to address. I have to say that for the hon. Member for Harrow West (Mr Thomas) to say that the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board is a major issue in the countryside...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c217
House
House of Commons

It is not an insult. If it is an insult, it is an insult to Opposition Members who have been using that sort of analogy to show the relationship between modern-day farmers and their work force.

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c217
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman does not seem to grasp that, if someone decides to change their job in the future, they will obviously want to take into account what terms and conditions the alternative is offering them. I will not dispute his figures, because they are the ones laid down at...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c219
House
House of Commons

I was referring to the wages order, not the wages themselves. The Agricultural Wages Board structure is gold-plated. As other hon. Members have mentioned, the reality is that a lot of agricultural wages order measures go way beyond what is laid down in statute for any other walk of life...

Member
James Paice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
534 c219
House
House of Commons