Skip to main content

1-20 of 141 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Government Equalities Office
Subject X
Racial discrimination

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Racial discrimination (141)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I should possibly declare an interest as vice-president of the Princess Royal Trust for Carers in respect of disability. I support the amendment proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Ouseley, or that proposed by the noble Baroness, which seem to do the same thing. The only possible advantage...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c372
House
House of Lords

Certainly, if that was in the Bill, people would know what the Bill meant.

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c309
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may make a practical suggestion. I know it is the first day in Committee and we are far from achieving our target, but might it be possible, as in previous Bills, for the Government to circulate notes on clauses and amendments in order to make the proceedings a...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything that the noble Baroness, Lady Gould, has just said. I represented a transsexual person in a case in Strasbourg. The amendments to our law sprang out of the enlightened decisions of the European Court of Human Rights about the right to respect for private...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c381-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 11 to 15 would add marital status, including those who are unmarried, widowed or divorced, to the list of characteristics protected by the Bill. Amendments 25, 16, 39 and 46 to 48 are consequential to that. That would extend the protection offered by the protected characteristic of...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c389-91
House
House of Lords

The point that is being made in the Bill is that discrimination takes place against people who are transsexual. That is what we need to focus on.

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c384
House
House of Lords

My view, for what it is worth, is that, as presently drafted, it would be very difficult indeed to make this an operative sanction in a particular case unless it were ignored altogether. I wonder whether that is desirable. I am not sure what Clause 3 is intended to get...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c319
House
House of Lords

I, too, support these amendments, particularly as they relate to disability. The Bill makes it possible for non-disabled people to claim protection from direct discrimination or harassment because they are associated with a disabled person or are perceived to be a disabled person or to have any other protected characteristic....

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c371
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would accept that the Government were moving as fast as they could if it had not been for the fact that the statement by the Solicitor-General in another place that research was being commissioned from the EHRC was not being carried into effect. We have wasted several...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for a long response. I also thank all noble Lords from across the House for an extremely interesting and lively debate. I want to make a number of points. First, unfortunately, there is a disturbing level of discussion which appears to me like a...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c329-30
House
House of Lords

I thought that I had made it clear that if there is equality of outcome, there is no point in having equality of opportunity. That is what is pernicious about this Bill.

Member
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall say a word or two about the drafting of the clause and what it really seems to be aiming at. I do that by starting from Amendment 2, proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Graham of Edmonton. The Committee may notice that his proposal is that...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c317-9
House
House of Lords

Equality Bill. Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 9 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to.

Department
Government Equalities Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c298-351,367-92
House
House of Lords

I know the area and, so far as I know, the people there are very proud of the noble Lord. I received a brief from a body called the Equality Trust, which states: ""More equal societies work better for everyone"." It comes at the issue not from the point of...

Member
Lord Graham of Edmonton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c306-7
House
House of Lords

Is it possible for the noble Lord to make available in the Library the statistics that he gave us? We certainly do not want to legislate without evidence and we really must have evidence-based facts. I do not know whether those statistics are fact—I have never heard them before—and I...

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c307
House
House of Lords

As the noble Baroness said, they are breath-taking. I have taken a breath and I will sit down.

Member
Lord Graham of Edmonton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c307
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to take part in this debate, and I hang my hat on Amendment 2. I start by congratulating the noble Baroness, Lady Warsi, on making a robust attack on the concept. She was able to give us some interesting aspects of where it was...

Member
Lord Graham of Edmonton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c305
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Government on bringing forward the Bill, which will strengthen existing legislation tackling discrimination. I apologise to the House that I was unable to be in the Chamber for Second Reading. I should probably apologise also for what I say today: I flew across the Atlantic...

Member
Baroness Meacher (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c304-5
House
House of Lords

Oxford Road.

Member
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c305
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the other amendments in my name in this group as well. It is a pleasure to open the debate for consideration of the Equality Bill as it goes through your Lordships’ House. I look forward to the informed discussions that will take place and...

Member
Baroness Warsi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
716 c298-302
House
House of Lords