Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Education
Member X
Lord Barwell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Department for Education (9)

Member

More
Barwell, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I spoke in the Second Reading debate and sat through most of the Committee stage because one of the main issues in my constituency is standards in schools, particularly secondary schools. The former Secretary of State, the right hon. Member for Morley and Outwood (Ed Balls), approved a number of...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c826-7
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has just said that the academies that the previous Government set up were in disadvantaged areas. In the London borough of Croydon, he approved two academies in two of the most affluent wards in the borough.

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c824
House
House of Commons

First, I thank the hon. Member for Gedling (Vernon Coaker) for being so generous in his speeches on this amendment and the previous amendment in allowing people to intervene and ask him questions. I appreciate that. The amendment is further evidence of the dichotomy of the Labour party's approach to...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c421-2
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention, but my experience in my part of the world is very different. In Croydon we had one of the original city technology colleges, which has converted to an academy, as most CTCs have, and the academy partners have continued to work closely...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c422-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes the point far more eloquently than I can. At some point in the future, the shadow Education Minister might have the honour of being the Minister again, or even the Secretary of State, who will sign off the applications for academy status. However, the amendment would...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c422
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman talks about a massive expansion, but surely the key point about this legislation is that it is permissive. Special schools and primary schools will become academies only if those schools themselves judge that they want to be academies. Does he not trust the judgment of those schools,...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c382
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will know that in London constituencies like mine, people in very disadvantaged circumstances often live right next door to fairly affluent areas. Why does he think that only poorly performing schools should try to improve? Why should satisfactory schools, good schools and outstanding schools not also try...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c382
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman said that he had approved an all-through school in my constituency. Where was the evidence base for the primary section in that application?

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c415
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is trying to make the case that the exclusion rates are higher in academies, and is comparing them with the whole of the maintained sector. Is it not true that research published by his Department when he was a Minister showed that exclusion rates in academies are...

Member
Lord Barwell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2010
Reference
514 c452
House
House of Commons