Skip to main content

1-20 of 499 results for subject:Defence

Department X
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Subject X
Treaties

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Treaties (499)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether the provisions of part two of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 will apply to the extension of the agreement between the US and the UK outlined in article 11 of the 1967 Exchange of Notes number...

Asked by
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2016
Reference
50170
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 November 2012
Reference
DEP2012-1769
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Deposited by
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
1 November 2012
Reference
DEP2012-1584
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the noble Lord referred to the two amendments as probing amendments. I think that they could better be described as tongue-in-cheek amendments. Similar amendments were moved in the House of Commons, but at least they applied to Clauses 3, 4 and 6. These amendments mysteriously apply only to...

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1230
House
House of Lords

39A: Clause 6, page 5, line 6, leave out subsection (4) and insert— ““(4) The referendum condition is that— (a) a joint committee of both Houses of Parliament publishes a report containing a recommendation about whether it is necessary for a referendum to be held in respect of a draft...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1225
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord, Lord Dykes, is right on that subject. The problem is the people who believe in the thin end of the wedge, but the way to deal with that is to have a proper process for deciding what is significant and requires a referendum and what...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1229-30
House
House of Lords

We all know the noble Lord’s views on this matter. The experience of the 1975 referendum was that it did not resolve the issue of whether we stayed in the European Union. We won a yes vote, but it did not resolve the fundamental issue. However, on issues such as...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1228
House
House of Lords

I, too, have a copy of the coalition agreement in front of me. While the noble Lord is right in what he says about bullet point three, he is very selective in his interpretation of what to pick and choose, because he does not notice that bullet point four says:...

Member
Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1228-9
House
House of Lords

I have the greatest affection for the noble Baroness, but I think that her attempt to justify the fact that the terms of the coalition agreement have not been met in this case is neither muscular nor robust. I think, therefore, that our friends on those Benches have something to...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1229
House
House of Lords

I intervene only briefly and thank the noble Lord for giving way. Is he not perfectly correct in general and in the specifics he mentioned? There is no apparent transfer of power, notion or concept built into the EPPO proposals. That is the European Union being allowed by the sovereign...

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1229
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendment 39B. These are probing amendments. We are not saying they are perfectly drafted but they are an attempt, as always from this side of the House, to be helpful to the Government. They are an attempt to substitute a parliamentary process for...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1225-8
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord seems to be saying that referendums should be held only on really important issues, such as whether we join the euro. Would he therefore agree that we should hold a referendum on something even more important: whether we stay in the European Union at all?

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1228
House
House of Lords

No, I specifically excluded the House of Lords. It was the House of Commons. The House of Commons had before the meeting of its committee a Member of this House, who tried to explain exactly why the Government acted as they did. I hope that when the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1238
House
House of Lords

The president of the Liberal Democrats is very well known to me. He is a supporter of the European Union. He simply believes that the only way to end the misrepresentation of what the European Union is doing and the attempts to get us out without directly facing the question...

Member
Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1238
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like briefly to return to what the noble Lord, Lord Dykes, said when he saw fit to expatiate on the Daily Express’s anti-euro campaign. At an earlier stage in our debates, he said that he had examples of 125 anti-euro headlines in the hated, Murdoch-ite, Barclay-ite...

Member
Lord Willoughby de Broke (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1241
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a feeling that we have reached the stage in the debate when we could leave the press and the Daily Express, and move to the precise issues and amendments in the debate.

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1241
House
House of Lords

No, my Lords—

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1241
House
House of Lords

I remember the 1975 referendum very well. I took part in it myself. If Mr Farron believes that we should have a referendum because our relationship with the European Union has become poisonous, he is right and I agree with him. However, it is not only UKIP—there are Labour Members...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1238-9
House
House of Lords

If the result of the referendum was a yes vote, which I believe the noble Baroness, Lady Williams, has suggested would definitely be the case, the noble Lord would refuse to accept that verdict, as he did with the 1975 referendum.

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1239
House
House of Lords