Skip to main content

1-20 of 732 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Communities and Local Government
Publisher X
House of Lords

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Communities and Local Government (732)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher

House of Lords (732)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what protections are in place to avoid conflicts of interest in the negotiating process between local authorities and trade unions in relation to the terms and conditions of public sector workers.

Asked by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2017
Reference
HL1901
House
House of Lords

My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Kris Hopkins) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I would like to update hon. Members with a number of actions by my Department relating to local government.

Updating statutory notices for the...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
HLWS426
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
29 March 2014
Reference
DEP2014-0525
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the full and wide-ranging debate that has taken place during our consideration of the Growth and Infrastructure Bill. Last week the other place disagreed with the amendment to remove the employee shareholder clause from this Bill. In today’s debate I will explain why the...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative; Conservative; Conservative; Other (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1248-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have always been a strong supporter of employees owning shares in the companies that they work for, particularly smaller companies. In my own history, virtually everyone had shares in the company that I built up in the 1980s and 1990s. Obviously, the principle is observable in groups...

Member
Lord Flight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2013
Reference
744 cc594-5
House
House of Lords

Your Lordships now come to whether Clause 27 should stand part of the Bill. As noble Lords have heard, the clause allows for an agreement by which an employee can receive shares worth £2,000 or more at the date of issue and then lose his or her rights to claim...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2013
Reference
744 cc603-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pannick

81D: Clause 27, page 34, line 15, at end insert—

“(d) the conditions regulating the agreement contained in subsection (12) are satisfied.”

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c265
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 81D and 92 are in my name and that of the noble Lord, Lord Adonis. They are in the first of a series of groups of amendments which address Clause 27. As your Lordships know, Clause 27 allows employers to buy off employment rights otherwise enjoyed by...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc265-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on Second Reading I expressed my concerns about the whole concept behind this clause. Various Ministers have suggested that only a small group of companies are likely to be interested in these proposals: new, high-technology, rapid-growth, micro and small companies which might want to encourage employees into more...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc267-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in that for many years I was chairman of the Industrial Co-partnership Association. I also happen to be fortunate enough to have floated a company on the stock exchange when we had 1,000 employees, and we gave 10% of the company to our employees.

I...

Member
Lord Vinson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c269
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at Second Reading I opposed these provisions. In my view this is yet another attempt by Government to remove employment rights which have been hard fought for by previous generations. In my view, it is a backdoor means of introducing the Beecroft proposals which were recently condemned not...

Member
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc269-270
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have worked for a long time with minority groups who employ their women in a system that is very similar to what is proposed. They have an interest in the business, they are committed to the business, they have kinship ties, and they have absolutely no rights....

Member
Baroness Afshar (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc271-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest. Before I joined this House I was a serial entrepreneur. I have started many businesses from scratch. The most recent one employed 200 staff after being in business for four years. I am a big fan of giving employees a stake in the success...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c272
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the issues in this debate on Clause 27, and the other amendments, have not changed. I take the view that the objectives of the clause and the conditions attached to wider share ownership were wrong then and remain wrong. The

issues that British industry faces today are not...

Member
Lord Morris of Handsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc273-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it would be extremely helpful if the clause contained a clearer definition of “profit share” and “equity participation”. That is where the confusion will arise and cause the greatest difficulty. Profit share is relatively clear, straightforward, simple and very motivating. I wholly agree with the noble Baroness who...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc274-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Flight, on being the first speaker in more than 50 on the Bill so far to defend this shares-for-rights proposal. His reward will no doubt be substantial hereafter.

I also welcome the noble Viscount the Minister to our debates on the Bill....

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc275-6
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord draw a distinction between the legal advice to be given in the potential sale of a listed company, where the majority shareholders have a separate set of interests and the minority shareholders—the working shareholders possibly have a very different set of interests? Are we to have...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c276
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are talking about individual employees who are seeking to take jobs, which is a different situation from the one that the noble Lord has described. We are not talking about the takeover of companies, which is the issue he raised. However, the noble Lord is right to...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c276
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is correct; that is what I am saying—you need two sets of lawyers in any case.

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 c276
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord therefore proposes a system that is even more complex and onerous than is envisaged. Such advice should be paid for by the employer, and there should be an explicit agreement between employer and employee stipulating the employment rights that are being foregone and the value of the...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
743 cc276-7
House
House of Lords