Skip to main content

1-20 of 66 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department of Trade and Industry
Subject X
Foster care

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Foster care (66)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I shall speak very briefly in support of both noble Baronesses on the amendment. Four years ago, a colleague of mine and his admirable wife adopted three severely damaged little girls. Over the four years in which they have looked after them, I have watched the incredible improvement in those...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c97-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am right behind the noble Baroness, Lady Morris of Bolton, on this group of amendments. Although concurrency planning is still at an early stage, the evidence is outstanding that it is in the best interests of the child and is highly successful. We need to give it a boost...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c97
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1:"After Clause 2, insert the following new clause—" ““FOSTER PARENTS INVOLVED IN CONCURRENT PLANNING SCHEME In section 171ZL(2)(a) of SSCBA 1992 (entitlement) at end insert ““including an adoptive parent who was initially a foster parent under a concurrent planning scheme””.”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, in moving Amendment No. 1, I speak to...

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c95-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Morris of Bolton, for bringing this issue back on Report, and other noble Lords who have spoken in the debate. The noble Baroness hoped that we had made progress since Committee, and I hope that what I have to say will indicate that I believe...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c98-100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share the convictions of all four of those who have spoken so far.

Member
Bishop of Winchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c98
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, shall speak very briefly in support of the amendment. It makes absolute sense. Indeed, the people who take on this responsibility are doing so for the good of the community, which will end up with more responsible and better adjusted adults—and, my goodness, we need them....

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c98
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2:"Page 2, line 10, at end insert—" ““(1A) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) and (c), the relationship with the child is that the employee has parental responsibility for the child or has made in some other form to be set out in regulations under this section a commitment to...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c100-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that. I look forward to receiving his letter. Today, he will have made many people very happy. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 3 [Additional paternity leave: birth]:

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I believe that if the conclusion is that the regulations as currently drafted cover the position, nothing specific will be put forward, although the guidance notes will need to be amended to reflect the conclusion. I will write to the noble Baroness and all noble Lords who have spoken today...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support the amendment. The purpose of the noble Lord, Lord Northbourne, in trying to clarify the relationship about which we are talking between the man and the child is commendable. Of course, none of us can ensure that, by a piece of legislation, what a man says or...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c102
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support what is clearly behind this amendment—it will be behind quite a number of the amendments—to encourage the father’s parental role in supporting the child right through life. I am also a little worried about whether it is drafted in the right way and whether it is...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c102
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may reiterate a point. Our concern is that using this definition would potentially restrict the number of people who could benefit from these arrangements. For good or ill, we already have the definition in respect of ordinary paternity leave and pay. Our concern is that if that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c105
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister. I am always sceptical about consultation, especially when I have not been consulted. I wonder whether the Minister could arrange for me to have the relevant documentation and I will express my views to the consultation, although I dare say it will not make much difference. The...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c105
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3:"Page 2, line 46, at end insert—" ““( ) Regulations under this section shall provide for the mother to provide written confirmation that the person claiming additional paternity leave has satisfied the conditions in subsection (1)(b) and (c) and is the only person claiming it; and the employer concerned shall...

Member
Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c105-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can see that I am not going to win the argument. The final point I want to make is that I would be most grateful if the Minister could let me see the document the person will have to sign. Everything is in the detail here. If the person is committing...

Member
Lord Northbourne (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c105
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a very ingenious solution to what is clearly a problem, so I support the amendment. The very fact that the onus would be on the individual to make the claim would reduce the burden on the employer. Further, there at least would be a basis on which...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this amendment as I did in Grand Committee—not because I go along with the dire warnings of the noble Baroness, Lady Miller of Hendon, about the possibility of fraud. That was certainly the main thrust of her argument, if not the only argument. The likelihood of fraudulent claims over additional...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c107-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 15:"Page 12, line 10, at end insert—" ““( ) The higher sum so specified shall not be greater than 110 per cent of the current maximum amount of a week’s pay immediately prior to the date of the order.”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, Amendment No. 15 in Clause 14 introduces the concept of uprating...

Member
Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief. Although the Government are clearly not in a position to restore the link between redundancy pay and average earnings, we regard this measure as a step in the right direction. Despite the fact that we deplore the Government’s coyness in not telling us how much...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in response to the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, I always try to be refreshingly frank in these matters. She will certainly bring me to book if I am not. Perhaps I may challenge her on trying to put words in my mouth about where we are going on this. There was certainly...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2006
Reference
681 c137
House
House of Lords