Skip to main content

1-20 of 587 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department of Trade and Industry
Publisher X
House of Lords

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department of Trade and Industry (587)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher

House of Lords (587)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Employment Relations and Postal Services, Jim Fitzpatrick, has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. On 11 January 2007, I announced the launch of a further consultation on draft regulations to increase the holiday entitlement from 20 days to 28 days (pro...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written statements
Date
12 June 2007
Reference
692 c111-2WS
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 27/03/2007 from Lord Truscott to Baroness Howe of Idlicote regarding flexible working for parents.

Deposited by
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Deposited papers
Date
3 April 2007
Reference
HDEP 2007/329
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Employment Relations and Postal Services (Jim Fitzpatrick) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) set up the Clergy Working Group in 2004 to look at clergy working conditions as part of its review of...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written statements
Date
20 March 2007
Reference
690 c86WS
House
House of Lords

Increasing the holiday entitlement: I. Summary of consultation responses and the Government's response to the consultation. 62 p. II. Partial regulatory impact assessment. 46 p. III. A further consultation. 26 p.

Deposited by
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Consultation papers; Impact assessments; Consultation papers (Government responses); Deposited papers
Date
11 January 2007
Reference
DEP 07/142
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Jim Fitzpatrick) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. On 13 June 2006, I announced the launch of a consultation on proposals to increase the holiday entitlement from four weeks to 5.6 weeks, subject to a maximum entitlement of 28 days, implementing...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written statements
Date
11 January 2007
Reference
688 c19-20WS
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 23 November be approved [Second Report from the Statutory Instruments Committee]. The noble Lord said: My Lords, noble Lords will recall that the Government introduced, in the Employment Act 2002, a framework designed to improve the way in...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
687 c1723-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords will be relieved to hear, due to the lateness of the hour, that we welcome the order, which is intended to ensure that the dispute resolution framework set out in the Employment Act 2002 will apply to the three stated new areas. We welcome any measures...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
687 c1724-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this must be a wonderful day for the Government, when the three parties of this Parliament all agree. On behalf of the Liberal Democrat Benches, I welcome the order.

Member
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
687 c1725
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am exceedingly grateful for the support and constructive comments of noble Lords this afternoon. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Roberts, and the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. I shall deal with the couple of points raised by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, about the burden...

Member
Lord Truscott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
687 c1725-6
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Employment Act 2002 (amendment of schedules 3 4 and 5) (SI 2007/30). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Truscott
Answering member
Lord De Mauley
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
14 December 2006
Reference
687 c1723-6
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 31/10/2006 from Lord Sainsbury of Turville to Baroness Howe of Idlicote regarding guidance on the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006.

Deposited by
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Deposited papers
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1960
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I welcome the clear explanation given by the Minister on these new orders. I was supportive in the other place, as my party is and has been, of the importance of giving people in the workplace the opportunity to meet their need for maternity and paternity leave, so it is...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c68GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (Consequential Amendment to Statutory Adoption Pay) Order 2006. The noble Lord said: As Members of the Committee will be aware, the Work and Families Act 2006 achieved Royal...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c63-7GC
House
House of Lords

I have already spoken to these regulations. I beg to move. Moved, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Maternity and Parental Leave etc. and the Paternity and Adoption Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2006—(Lord Sainsbury of Turville.) On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c69GC
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the Minister for his detailed introduction to the regulations and the order. The Explanatory Notes to the adoption and children order highlight that the change will close a potential loophole which could have allowed both members of an unmarried couple to receive statutory adoption pay....

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c67-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their general support. I shall deal with the specific points raised. We dealt in great detail with the question of whether we could pass some of the administrative costs back to the Inland Revenue. We discovered that there were no very significant savings to the...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c68-9GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Adoption and Children Act 2002 (consequential amendment to statutory adoption pay). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft SI on maternity and parental leave etc and the paternity and adoption leave (amendment). Lords Grand Committee (Moses Room).

Lead member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Answering member
Baroness Morris of Bolton
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c63-9GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on maternity and parental leave etc. and the paternity and adoption leave (amendment). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft SI on Adoption and Children Act 2002 (consequential amendment to statutory adoption pay). Lords Grand Committee (Moses Room).

Lead member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Answering member
Baroness Morris of Bolton
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c69GC
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the importance of work/life balance. Motion withdrawn. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Gale
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c910-40
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the importance of work/life balance. Motion withdrawn. (Part 1 of 2)

Lead member
Baroness Gale
Answering member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c888-900
House
House of Lords