Skip to main content

1-20 of 321 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Publisher X
House of Commons

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Constitutional Affairs (321)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher

House of Commons (321)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs whether the Government plan to restrict to members of the legal profession the ability to provide advice on employment law; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Desmond Swayne (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 January 2007
Reference
114314; 455 c871W;455 c869W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
14 September 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1670
House
House of Commons

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what (a) salary and (b) pension benefits relating to electoral duties were paid to the chief executive of each local authority in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2006
Reference
64925; 445 c931-2W;445 c931-2W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
23 February 2006
Reference
DEP 06/521
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My right hon. and noble Friend, the Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer of Thoroton, has made the following written statement in the other place today:"““Following my written statement of 13 July this year, I am now announcing further progress on my programme of work to increase the...

Member
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written statements
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
438 c43-4WS
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 October 2005
Reference
DEP 05/1246
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree; that should be the approach. However, a very small number of complex cases will arise, and that was recognised in Scotland, as the hon. Gentleman said in an earlier intervention. In Scotland, legal aid is available only for a very small number of complex cases. The Scottish...

Member
Alan Reid (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c543-4
House
House of Commons

If the existing bodies, which receive a lot of money from the taxpayer, are performing as poorly as the hon. Gentleman suggests, what are they doing with their time?

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c532
House
House of Commons

As I said earlier, the advice available for people who have suffered employment discrimination is very patchy. The equal opportunities bodies are not providing a national system of access to justice, and it is not a question of cannibalising funding for them. The point that this House must address, and...

Member
Marsha Singh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c531-2
House
House of Commons

I am particularly grateful to my hon. Friend for his lucid presentation of his Bill. He mentions discrimination against disabled people—a problem that has long since been recognised. Does he know the views of the Disability Rights Commission on this matter, and has it expressed an opinion about his Bill?

Member
Tom Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c531
House
House of Commons

It is very new Labour.

Member
Eric Forth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c531
House
House of Commons

I am bit worried about the phrase that the hon. Lady has just used. She said that if no compensation is paid, that is all right. Surely the whole point about the phrase the ““compensation culture”” and the debate about the Bill is that, in encouraging people excessively to make...

Member
Eric Forth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c589
House
House of Commons

That is an excellent idea. May I suggest the right hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Mr. Forth) or, even better, the hon. Member for Shipley (Philip Davies)?

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c593
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman on the research question. The Legal Services Commission does have its own independent research arm, which does a lot of work. The key is that it is independent.

Member
Mark Tami (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c569
House
House of Commons

All my right hon. Friend’s points are well made, and he has made them rather better than I could have done. The hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull, North talked about making sure that we have value for money in these processes. Clause 9 talks about giving the board a...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c572
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is again perceptive and anticipates that I had noted that point as something about schedule 1 to which I wanted to draw attention. There is an even worse provision that shows that the hon. Member for Bradford, West might be guilty of discrimination, but I shall touch...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c573
House
House of Commons

I thought that the hon. Gentleman would raise this matter when he considered the membership of the board. There is a further contradiction in paragraph 2(4) of schedule 1. Will he comment on the fact that the criteria for appointing three of the 10 individuals who will serve on the...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c572-3
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that theoretically, someone who had a disability, who was from an ethnic minority and who had also taken proceedings before the tribunal might be able to apply under all three categories?

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c573
House
House of Commons

Yes, but there is a more serious point here. The number of members of the board would be limited, and by statute one of the positions would have to be given to a disabled person, so if a number of people applied, there could be indirect discrimination against someone on...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c573-4
House
House of Commons

If one wanted to set up such a board—which I do not—surely one would want on it people competent in administration and in ensuring that money got to the right place. The suggested constitution of the board, with people who have been aggrieved by decisions of a tribunal, and those...

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2005
Reference
437 c574
House
House of Commons