Skip to main content

1-20 of 214 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Subject X
Equality

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (214)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Equality (214)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right honourable friend the Minister of State, Employment Relations and Postal Affairs, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Pat McFadden) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. Following my Statement of 22 May 2008 (col. 32WS), I am today launching a consultation on the implementation of the directive...

Member
Lord Carter of Barnes (Labour)
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Written statements
Date
8 May 2009
Reference
710 c67-8WS
House
House of Lords

Following my statement of 22 May 2008, Official Report, column 32WS, I am today launching a consultation on the implementation of the Directive on conditions for temporary (agency) workers—Directive 2008/104/EC—the "Agency Workers Directive", which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 5 December 2008. Copies of...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Written statements
Date
8 May 2009
Reference
492 c27-8WS
House
House of Commons

My Lords, my noble friend is right. You cannot advertise a job vacancy and say only people of one nationality need apply, or indeed one race, or one sex.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the current industrial action at the Lindsey oil refinery and elsewhere in the country.

Lead member
Lord Mandelson
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c472-80
House
House of Lords

Yes, my Lords, they are.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister therefore mean that the Italian workers at this refinery are being the paid the same wages as the British ones?

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point is they are not paying the national minimum wage in this case. They are paying the same rates as those that have been collectively bargained to benefit other workers at the refinery. As a general observation, of course we can establish this; were there a suspicion...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the national minimum wage that applies that of the UK or that of the subcontractor? If it is the subcontractor’s, or in either case, what powers do we have to check that it really is paying that national minimum wage, because we presumably do not see the...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare that I am a member of Unite. I completely agree with my noble friend that we must all be temperate in what we say, particularly as negotiations continue. However, I understood him to say that one of the contentious points was that British workers were not...

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not rather mischievous to make capital out of the phrase ““British jobs for British workers””? Surely it would have been far more dangerous and controversial if he had said ““British workers for British jobs””, but the Prime Minister never said that.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, so much so is it the case that British workers were able to apply for these jobs that the subcontractor undertaking this work, prior to the letting of this contract to the Italian firm, was another subcontractor which, for whatever reason—I am not ascribing fault to either side—was...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend. We must all expect to have our phrases and soundbites misused from time to time, and taken up like a stick with which to beat us. Such are the trials of political life.

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Lord agree that the slogan ““British jobs for British workers”” is much older than the National Front or the BNP? It is a clarion call that has reverberated around this House on many occasions over the past 200 or 250 years, and, indeed, has as...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am unable to provide the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, with the figures that he asks for but I am happy to make inquiries of my officials. He is right to say that such an aspiration is a worthy clarion call and a noble policy objective, as long...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a director of Sellafield Ltd, although what I am going to say has nothing to do with Sellafield. The Minister, in a very temperate and moderate Statement today which I think we can all agree with, laid great emphasis on the European directive...

Member
Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c480
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand very well the point being made and the case being argued by my noble friend Lord Lea. I accept that where rights or entitlements that have been collectively negotiated and bargained are higher than the statutory minima, of course it is possible for these collectively bargained...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has just referred to the national minimum wage as being the wage guaranteed by the United Kingdom’s transposition of the posting of workers directive. That is a lot lower than the local collective bargaining benchmark standard. My noble friend will remember as well as I...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c478-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Hunt of Wirral and Lord Razzall, for their responses to their Statement and the support that they offer the Government, on whose behalf I speak unanimously, as one person. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for his welcome to...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c477-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with permission I would like to make a Statement about the current industrial action at the Lindsey oil refinery and elsewhere in the country. On Thursday and Friday last week, contract workers at the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire and elsewhere took part in unofficial industrial action. This...

Member
Lord Mandelson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c472-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral, in welcoming the Statement from the Secretary of State. I waited with eager anticipation, as did, no doubt, members of the other parties in your Lordships’ House, to discover what line the Conservative opposition would take on this issue...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2009
Reference
707 c476-7
House
House of Lords