Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Defence

Department X
Attorney General

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Attorney General (13)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 14/03/2007 from Lord Goldsmith to Jon Trickett MP regarding the legal status of the United Kingdom renewal of nuclear deterrent.

Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
DEP 07/626
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Lords debate on unstarred question on whether Her Majesty's Government accept the legitimacy of pre-emptive armed attack as a constituent of the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter; and whether they will define the principles upon which it will be exercised.

Lead member
Lord Thomas of Gresford
Answering member
Lord Goldsmith
Department
Attorney General
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
21 April 2004
Reference
660 c356-76
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 June 1991
Reference
193 c16
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on manufacture sale & deployment of these weapons.
Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 1991
Reference
193 c16
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 June 1991
Reference
193 c16
House
House of Commons
If he has received any representations concerning the legality of weapons used by coalition forces in the Gulf war.
Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 1991
Reference
193 c16
House
House of Commons

What inquiries are currently being undertaken by the special fraud office into contracts for sonar equipment supplied by Marconi & its associated companies.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 1989
Reference
156 c162W;156 c164W
House
House of Commons

What was cost of MOD's appeal to the House of Lords on 28 April against the Court of Appeal's ruling on 31 July 1987 in the case of Pearce v Sec of State for Defence.

Asked by
David Hinchliffe (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 May 1988
Reference
133 c262W
House
House of Commons

To take legal proceedings against Kent county constabulary requiring them to fulfil their statutory responsibility under section 228 of Local Government Act 1972 & provide information on precise nature of items purchased from Q.E.D., Parker Hale Ltd., Hull Cartridge Co.Ltd., royal small arms factory, royal ordnance factory & Longstaff (Rec)...

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 1988
Reference
126 c332W
House
House of Commons

Why Dowty Rotol was not prosecuted for fraud, in the light of that company's overcharging on MOD contract work.

Asked by
Lord Stratford (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 1987
Reference
123 c251W
House
House of Commons

To comment on progress of investigation by police into Marconi Company about possible fraudulent dealings with the Attorney-General. - Ref to 121 c272W.

Asked by
Dennis Canavan (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 1987
Reference
121 c907W;121 c897W
House
House of Commons

To comment on nature of inquiries into Marconi by Ministry of Defence police.

Asked by
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 1987
Reference
121 c373W;121 c368-9W
House
House of Commons

To comment progress of inquiry into Marconi

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 1987
Reference
121 c272w;121 c268W
House
House of Commons