Skip to main content

1-20 of 166 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Church Commissioners
Publisher X
House of Commons

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Church Commissioners (166)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher

House of Commons (166)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Right Honourable Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, whether the employment rights of the Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, are the same as those of a Dean of a stand-alone Anglican cathedral.

Asked by
John Howell (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 December 2018
Reference
199381
House
House of Commons

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Caroline Spelman
Answering member
Karin Smyth
Department
Church Commissioners
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
24 April 2018
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Tony Baldry
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Church Commissioners
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
12 May 2014
House
House of Commons
Good morning, Mr. Speaker. The proposal, which recognises that housing is an important element in the terms of service of office holders, seeks the provision of appropriate accommodation and the establishment of a consistent framework to govern the relationship between housing providers and office holders.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101
House
House of Commons
Will the Church Commissioners listen carefully to the concerns of the diocesan synods and the meeting of the Church of England General Synod next week about this transfer of £4 billion of property from the parishes to the dioceses? The current legal vehicle, the corporation sole, ensures unencumbered continuity of these properties from generation to generation. The new trust will not do that. Will the hon. Gentleman assure me that the commissioners will look carefully to see that the property vested in the new parsonage boards of the dioceses will be as safe and inviolable as it is under the current legal arrangements?
Asked by
Robert Key (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101-2
House
House of Commons
I refer hon. Members to my entry in the Register of Members' Interests. I would like to follow up a point made by the hon. Member for North-West Leicestershire (David Taylor). Many parsonage homes were endowed locally for the furtherance of the Church's work locally. This centralising measure will take power away from benefices and give it to diocesan boards of finance. Will the hon. Gentleman representing the Church Commissioners convey the serious concern that exists among a great many people throughout the country about this centralising measure?
Asked by
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
A large proportion of parsonage houses were endowed locally. Land was given by a local landowner, and the houses were often built by a local individual after a fundraising effort on a grand scale. Why should we interfere with arrangements that have worked well for many years? We are transferring the title to the diocesan body, which will undoubtedly have a significantly different agenda of its own—different from that of the local community.
Asked by
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
I welcome the hon. Gentleman to these question sessions, and I also welcome the pertinence of his question. Clearly, the matter he raises preoccupies Members of the House. The General Synod will be aware of that when it meets next week, and I have no doubt that the views expressed here will be taken into account in its debates.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
I can assure the hon. Gentleman that we shall listen very carefully to the views of the General Synod next week. As he will know, ““Render unto Caesar that which belongs to Caesar””. To reverse the role, we must render unto the General Synod that which belongs to the General Synod. It will meet next week to discuss the matter. There are differences of views, but the hon. Gentleman, who is a member of the Synod, will be able to participate in those proceedings as well as the proceedings here.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101-2
House
House of Commons
In order to enlighten my hon. Friend and the House on what will be proposed and debated at the Synod next week, I can tell him that the primary aim of the legislation is to improve the security of the clergy by giving them rights equivalent to those enjoyed by employees under the Employment Relations Act 1999. As I said, the General Synod will consider that significant piece of legislation next week, and we await the outcome of its considerations.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1102
House
House of Commons
With reference to the Ecclesiastical Offices (Terms of Service) Measure, for what reason the ownership of a parsonage house is being removed from incumbents and vested in the diocese.
Asked by
Robert Key (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2008
Reference
471 c1101; 185162
House
House of Commons
The legislation to which the hon. Gentleman refers will improve the security of tenure of the clergy and ensure that they are able to exercise the duties of their offices competently.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
469 c442
House
House of Commons
How would the hon. Gentleman reply to the following comments of my constituent, the Rev. Stephen Trott? He writes:"““Common Tenure is just an empty title, devoid of any stated value, to be defined not by Parliament, which at present guarantees our rights, but by the Archbishops’ Council. In return, every parish will have to hand over its parsonage house, and every incumbent will in due course lose their protection under the law, in return for””—" only—"““limited access to employment rights.””"
Asked by
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
469 c442
House
House of Commons
Father Trott is a constituent of the hon. Gentleman and a member of the Church Commissioners board of governors. He has not yet written to me on this subject, but I am sure he will shortly do so. At the heart of the reforms is the desire to give security to the 4,000 stipendiary and 3,000 non-stipendiary clergy who hold office under time-limited licences. The legislation gives clergy rights equivalent to those that employees have had under section 23 of the Employment Relations Act 1999, as requested by the Government. I will be glad to take up the matter in relation to the Archbishops Council directly with Father Trott.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
469 c442
House
House of Commons
What assessment the Church Commissioners have made of the potential effect of the draft Ecclesiastical Officers (Terms of Service) Measure on the security of tenure of clergy.
Asked by
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
469 c442; 173648
House
House of Commons
Will the hon. Gentleman confirm that that measure aims to reduce the size of rural parishes that are nursed by one priest, who has to look after several parishes at once, which puts a huge burden on them? Will he confirm that that arrangement will be reviewed in the Measure?
Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
462 c17
House
House of Commons
Even accepting that the wheels of the Church grind slowly, does my hon. Friend agree that, given that we have been talking about this for some 10 years, it needs to move more quickly than it has? In so far as he can, will he encourage, through the clergy working group, other churches with similar problems to move equally quickly?
Asked by
Ben Chapman (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
459 c19
House
House of Commons
The clergy working group, on which the Church of England was represented, produced a statement of good practice setting out minimum standards for the terms and conditions of service for ministers of religion. The Church of England has committed itself to those principles and the General Synod has drafted legislation that has been sent to DTI officials, with whom we regularly communicate.
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
459 c18-9
House
House of Commons
With regard to my hon. Friend’s latter point, I certainly agree to do that. He has campaigned consistently on this and is understandably impatient about the synodical timetable. I can assure him that the Church has made excellent progress with these complex matters, and with his support, and that of the House, we will ensure that they reach legislation as quickly as possible. I have to tell him, however, that within the Church ““quickly as possible”” means ““not before 2009.””
Answered by
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
459 c19
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions the Church Commissioners have held with the Department of Trade and Industry on the work of the clergy working group.
Asked by
Ben Chapman (Labour)
Answering body
Church Commissioners
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
459 c18-9; 131442
House
House of Commons