Skip to main content

1-20 of 183 results for subject:"Conditions of employment"

Department X
Cabinet Office
Subject X
Textiles

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Textiles (183)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings on committal, in Public Bill Committee, on consideration, third reading and Lords amendments. Agreed to on question. Money resolution, agreed to on question. Carry over motion, agreed to on question.

Lead member
Oliver Letwin
Answering member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 cc34-105
House
House of Commons

I admire the eclecticism of the hon. Gentleman. I knew that I could not engage with him on mountain climbing but I underestimated his knowledge of bees and beekeepers. I shall take considered advice on the application to beekeeping and I have no doubt that the matter will be raised...

Member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 cc101-4
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

I will begin by saying something that several in the House might find mildly surprising in the context of this debate: regulation is often sensible and necessary. It is no part of the Government’s plans or our view...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c35
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is starting to outline a delicious smorgasbord of deregulation. I am particularly pleased about the clauses that will cut red tape for business. When the Departments looked at everything that could be deregulated, were there examples that they wanted to include in the Bill, but could...

Member
Lord Sharma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c35
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises an immensely important point. I was going to talk about it later, but let me deal with it now. He is absolutely right, and I am not talking of a few cases. We came across—and we continue to come across—many, many cases on which, given our...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

It would be helpful if the right hon. Gentleman could tell us the number of regulations that he wishes to abolish but cannot. Precisely how many are there? Perhaps he could produce a list.

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

That is a very tantalising thought, so I shall go back and see whether that is possible. I am sure we can put together a list. I do not know whether the hon. Gentleman or Opposition Front Benchers would like to see it very much, but it is extremely clear...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman does not need to exert himself; I will give way to him again.

Of course, some EU regulation is perfectly sensible, but the problem is that much of it, unfortunately, forces us to do things in ways that we would much prefer were not the case. I suspect...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

I certainly would not wish to offend the Minister; I merely want an answer. He said “many”; he said “many, many”; and I think he said “excessive”. How many regulations—he has been through them all—has he not been able to deal with in the Bill because of European legislation? Is...

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

I will send the hon. Gentleman a list. It will not be exhaustive, but I suspect it will contain hundreds, rather than tens, of cases for which we would have wished to do something different. Of course we have not kept an exhaustive tally—there is no point, because we cannot...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c36
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
David Rutley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

I will give way to both my hon. Friends, but then if the House will forgive me, I will make some progress.

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Bassetlaw (John Mann) likes mountains, so I think that that might be the way to get this concept through to him. We are talking about mountains of red tape in Europe. I remind Members that 70% of the cost of regulation on UK businesses comes from...

Member
David Rutley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is quite right. Leaving aside the badinage induced by Opposition Members, the serious point is that even before the renegotiation, the Government have made an extremely serious attempt at deregulation in the EU, working with British business to identify the most important things—I will send a list...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Bill and reassure my right hon. Friend that I would be surprised if history remembered this Government as radically liberal. Before he goes too much further into the detail, however, will he reassure me that he has considered, or that he will consider, sunset clauses for all...

Member
Steve Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c37
House
House of Commons

I have good news for my hon. Friend: it is not a matter of considering it; we have done it. Every single new regulation we have brought in—incidentally, their number is limited by our one in, two out principle, which means they are slightly more than twice balanced by things...

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 cc37-8
House
House of Commons

That is an excellent idea. I welcome the clause, but is it not the case that now that the EU regulates comprehensively in areas such as the environment and business, we do not need domestic regulation on top, but just the UK consequences of EU rules?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c38
House
House of Commons