1-20 of 70 results for primarymember:"Pauline Latham"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.271 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- primarymember:"Pauline Latham"
- We searched for
- primaryMember_ses:301778
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what restrictions have been placed on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma by (a) NHS England, (b) his Department and (c) NICE.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what restrictions have been placed on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma by (a) NHS England, (b) his Department and (c) NICE.
The Department has placed no restrictions on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance on the following treatments for melanoma. National Health Service commissioners are legally required to fund drugs and treatments recommended by NICE for eligible patients within three months of final guidance.
Appraisal number | Year of publication | Technology/condition | Recommendation |
TA268 | 2012 | Ipilimumab for previously treated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA269 | 2012 | Vemurafenib for locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive malignant melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA319 | 2014 | Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA321 | 2014 | Dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation‑positive melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA3571 | 2015 | Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA3661 | 2015 | Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA384 | 2016 | Nivolumab for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation. |
TA396 | 2016 | Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation. |
TA400 | 2016 | Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA410 | 2016 | Talimogene laherparepvec for unresectable metastatic melanoma | Optimised recommendation for talimogene laherparepvec as an option for treating unresectable, regionally or distantly metastatic (Stage IIIB, IIIC or IVM1a) melanoma that has not spread to bone, brain, lung or other internal organs, only if: - treatment with systemically administered immunotherapies is not suitable; and - the company provides talimogene laherparepvec with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme. |
TA414 | 2016 | Cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma | At the time of appraisal, the technology was not considered to be an appropriate use of NHS resources based on the data available. |
1 pembrolizumab within its licensed indication was appraised across two separate appraisals.
NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.
Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.
The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to prevent NHS England from imposing restrictions on patients' access to NICE-approved treatments for melanoma and other conditions; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to prevent NHS England from imposing restrictions on patients' access to NICE-approved treatments for melanoma and other conditions; and if he will make a statement.
The Department has placed no restrictions on patients accessing treatments for advanced (stage 4) melanoma.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance on the following treatments for melanoma. National Health Service commissioners are legally required to fund drugs and treatments recommended by NICE for eligible patients within three months of final guidance.
Appraisal number | Year of publication | Technology/condition | Recommendation |
TA268 | 2012 | Ipilimumab for previously treated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA269 | 2012 | Vemurafenib for locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive malignant melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA319 | 2014 | Ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA321 | 2014 | Dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation‑positive melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA3571 | 2015 | Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma after disease progression with ipilimumab | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA3661 | 2015 | Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma not previously treated with ipilimumab | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA384 | 2016 | Nivolumab for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation. |
TA396 | 2016 | Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable or metastatic melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation. |
TA400 | 2016 | Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma | Recommended in line with marketing authorisation and following agreement of patient access scheme. |
TA410 | 2016 | Talimogene laherparepvec for unresectable metastatic melanoma | Optimised recommendation for talimogene laherparepvec as an option for treating unresectable, regionally or distantly metastatic (Stage IIIB, IIIC or IVM1a) melanoma that has not spread to bone, brain, lung or other internal organs, only if: - treatment with systemically administered immunotherapies is not suitable; and - the company provides talimogene laherparepvec with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme. |
TA414 | 2016 | Cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma | At the time of appraisal, the technology was not considered to be an appropriate use of NHS resources based on the data available. |
1 pembrolizumab within its licensed indication was appraised across two separate appraisals.
NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.
Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.
The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps are being taken to ensure melanoma patients have access to the most clinically effective treatment options if they have (a) brain metastases and (b) previously taken part in a clinical trial.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps are being taken to ensure melanoma patients have access to the most clinically effective treatment options if they have (a) brain metastases and (b) previously taken part in a clinical trial.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended a number of drugs for use in the treatment of melanoma. National Health Service patients have a right in the NHS Constitution to drugs and treatments that have been recommended by NICE, where clinically appropriate.
NHS England has advised that it has carefully translated the evidence base on which NICE has based its recommendations of clinical and cost effectiveness for drugs and treatments for melanoma into practical clarifications which directly relate to how the recommended drug indication is incorporated into known treatment pathways in use in England.
Each set of clarifications is in keeping with the NICE recommendations within the marketing authorisation of the relevant drug.
The treatment criteria for both Cancer Drugs Fund and baseline-funded drug indications are set out in the National Cancer Drugs Fund List which is available at:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/national-cdf-list-v1-15.pdf
Discussions are taking place with NHS regional and National Cancer Research Institute experts on melanoma on formulating chemotherapy algorithms for the treatment of advanced or metastatic melanoma. These discussions relate in part to the drug treatment of brain metastases and the need to preserve recruitment to clinical trials and whether the qualifications that NHS England has applied in terms of treatment criteria for melanoma drugs within their respective marketing authorisations should be changed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people have been suspended from the Derbyshire Mental Health Trust in the last two years; and for how long those suspensions were active.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people have been suspended from the Derbyshire Mental Health Trust in the last two years; and for how long those suspensions were active.
The information requested is not available centrally. It may be obtained from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. We have written to Richard Gregory, Chair of the Trust, informing him of the hon. Member’s enquiry. He will reply shortly and a copy of the letter will be placed in the Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what his policy is on ensuring that patients have the right set out in the NHS Constitution to access any NICE-approved treatments that are clinically appropriate for them.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what his policy is on ensuring that patients have the right set out in the NHS Constitution to access any NICE-approved treatments that are clinically appropriate for them.
National Health Service patients’ right in the NHS Constitution to drugs and treatments recommended in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal and highly specialised technology guidance, where clinically appropriate, is underpinned by the legal requirement for NHS commissioners to fund such treatments, normally within three months of NICE issuing its final guidance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the oral contribution by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of 8 December 2016, Official Report, columns 188-9WH, whether her Department's proposals to widen the UK ban on ivory sales will...
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the oral contribution by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of 8 December 2016, Official Report, columns 188-9WH, whether her Department's proposals to widen the UK ban on ivory sales will...
We have been actively exploring options to implement the Government’s manifesto commitment to press for a total ban on ivory sales and early next year we will consult on our proposal to ban sales of ivory that is less than 70 years old as of March 2017. As part of this, we plan to seek evidence on options and impacts of taking further action.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the findings in the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Improvement and Assessment Framework data, published in September 2016, which showed that over two-thirds of CCGs have been rated as either needs...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the findings in the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Improvement and Assessment Framework data, published in September 2016, which showed that over two-thirds of CCGs have been rated as either needs...
The Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework (CCG IAF) contains two recognised evidence-based measures of whether patients with diabetes are being supported to successfully manage their condition. These are the achievement of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) treatment targets, which cover blood sugar, blood pressure and cholesterol control, and participation in structured education programmes.
These measures were selected to reflect matters highlighted by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in January 2016 in its report on the management of adult diabetes services. The purpose of the CCG IAF is to highlight the key areas where clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) need to make improvements. The number of CCGs in need of improvement against these two indicators is consistent with the findings of the PAC.
The NHS Operational Planning and Contracting Guidance 2017-2019 included an announcement that NHS England intends to launch a major programme of investment in the treatment and care of people with diabetes. As part of this, CCGs will be able to bid for additional funding of around £40 million per year for priorities which include improvements in relation to the achievement of the treatment targets and attendance at structured education programmes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what timetable he has set for publishing the next diabetes-specific ratings as part of the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework; and if he will publish that data on a quarterly basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what timetable he has set for publishing the next diabetes-specific ratings as part of the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework; and if he will publish that data on a quarterly basis.
As part of its statutory duty to perform an annual assessment of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), NHS England will publish its 2016/17 annual assessment of the six clinical priority areas within the CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework in July 2017, which include diabetes. All indicators that are available are updated as frequently as possible; the diabetes indicators are based on annual data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to hold NHS England to account on the delivery of the diabetes metrics outlined in the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016-17.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to hold NHS England to account on the delivery of the diabetes metrics outlined in the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016-17.
The mandate to NHS England requires it to develop the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework (CCG IAF) and its supporting indicators in 2016-17, and in subsequent years to improve CCG performance against the indicators by 2020. This includes a specific reference to diabetes. NHS England is being held to account for achieving the deliverables in the 2016-17 mandate through regular assurance and accountability meetings with senior Departmental officials and my Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State. NHS England has completed the development of the framework and established baseline data for each group of indicators. In subsequent years, NHS England will be held to account for supporting CCGs to deliver improvements in the CCG IAF indicators.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to support clinical commissioning groups that need improvement or have the greatest need for improvement for diabetes care under the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps his Department is taking to support clinical commissioning groups that need improvement or have the greatest need for improvement for diabetes care under the Clinical Commissioning Group Improvement and Assessment Framework.
NHS England will work with health communities/clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in need of improvement against CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework indicators to mutually identify the nature of the change needed and the type of support required to achieve this. A key focus of improvement will be to support CCGs and providers to locally map their services against nationally recognised best practice diabetes pathways and to identify where local pathways need to change in order to improve outcomes. NHS England is developing plans for additional support to be available from 2017/18 onwards:
- The NHS Operational Planning and Contracting Guidance 2017-2019 included an announcement that NHS England intends to launch a major programme of investment in the treatment and care of people with diabetes, for which CCGs will be able to bid for additional funding of approximately £40 million per year, focused on the key areas of diabetes care where improvements in outcomes will be most beneficial.
- A Diabetes CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework Independent Panel has been developed, chaired by the Chief Executive of Diabetes UK and includes panel members with a wide range of other diabetes clinical expertise. This will consider CCG positions in relation to the diabetes Improvement and Assessment Framework indicators and advise on actions to support improvement.
- Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs). As part of supporting the development of STPs, a “How to” guide for diabetes has been issued which sets out advice the actions which CCGs can take to support improvements.
- NHS England regional teams: NHS England has funded diabetes programme leads within each of the National Health Service regions to work with CCGs to support improvement.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the revenue accrued by HM Treasury through tax on ivory artworks and objets d'art in each of the last five years; and if his Department will make an estimate of the potential cost to the public purse...
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the revenue accrued by HM Treasury through tax on ivory artworks and objets d'art in each of the last five years; and if his Department will make an estimate of the potential cost to the public purse...
The information requested is not available. HM Revenue and Customs does not collect data on VAT and Customs Duty from traders to this level of detail.
What assessment the NAO has made of the potential effect of the UK leaving the EU on its work.
What assessment the NAO has made of the potential effect of the UK leaving the EU on its work.
The National Audit Office uses its resources to provide direct support to Parliament and stands ready to support parliamentary scrutiny of Brexit. In my humble view, there should be more, not less, parliamentary scrutiny of Brexit. The NAO is keeping in close touch with Departments as their preparations for exiting the EU develop. This will be a major task for Departments and is likely to include additional work for the NAO, not least the audit of the new Department for Exiting the European Union.
What value-for-money aspects of Brexit does the NAO intend to examine?
What value-for-money aspects of Brexit does the NAO intend to examine?
The NAO’s scrutiny will focus initially on the capacity and capability of Departments to deliver an effective and efficient exit process. The NAO will work with all Departments to assess the potential impact of exiting the European Union on their financial performance and position. The NAO is already the auditor of the new Department for Exiting the European Union and will work with it and the Treasury to ensure efficiency.
My right hon. Friend will be aware that both the 2010 and 2015 Conservative party manifestos said that we would ban all ivory trade. Will she update the House on what progress she made towards that aim at the Vietnam conference last week?
My right hon. Friend will be aware that both the 2010 and 2015 Conservative party manifestos said that we would ban all ivory trade. Will she update the House on what progress she made towards that aim at the Vietnam conference last week?
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising that matter. The conference was superbly successful and some real steps were taken towards improving awareness of the importance of preserving endangered species, the elephant in particular. In this country, we have announced our intention to ban the trade in post-1947 ivory—that is 70 years—and we will consult on that shortly to consider how we implement that and what further steps can be taken to meet our manifesto commitment.
What steps the Government is taking to give older workers the support they need to find or stay in work.
What steps the Government is taking to give older workers the support they need to find or stay in work.
Many older workers have caring responsibilities, which can make it hard for them to remain in work or even to return to work. What is the Secretary of State doing to encourage employers to work responsibly with those very valuable employees?
Many older workers have caring responsibilities, which can make it hard for them to remain in work or even to return to work. What is the Secretary of State doing to encourage employers to work responsibly with those very valuable employees?
I agree with my hon. Friend that those employees are often particularly responsible and have particular needs, if they have caring responsibilities. That is why the Government recognise the benefits of
flexible working. We extended the right of workers to request flexible working from June 2014. We have also introduced older claimant champions in jobcentres, and we are working with employers to help to highlight the benefits of employing older workers. Aviva, which I have mentioned in the context of Andy Briggs, is launching a new pilot scheme this Friday specifically to support carers. I very much hope that other companies will follow its example.
What steps her Department is taking to support the development of tourism in countries in Africa.
What steps her Department is taking to support the development of tourism in countries in Africa.
Economic development in Africa is very reliant on tourism. What does the Secretary of State feel about the continued slaughter of elephants and the fact that it will have a devastating effect on the tourist business?
Economic development in Africa is very reliant on tourism. What does the Secretary of State feel about the continued slaughter of elephants and the fact that it will have a devastating effect on the tourist business?
My hon. Friend raises a very important and controversial issue. The protection of wildlife in Africa is a priority for the Government, and we have a strategy to address it. Tourism is of course important across Africa. I have visited not just Kenya, but Sierra Leone, another country that needs to get back to investing in tourism, and that is something we can help with in the long run.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to limit the potential re-traumatisation of vulnerable 16 and 17 year old victims of sexual abuse or exploitation in the criminal justice system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to limit the potential re-traumatisation of vulnerable 16 and 17 year old victims of sexual abuse or exploitation in the criminal justice system.
The Government is committed to making sure that vulnerable and intimidated victims and witnesses get the support they need and have the confidence to come forward. A range of measures already exist to help reduce their anxiety, including giving evidence through live-link to the courtroom from a different room in the court, or away from the court building altogether, and the use of a Registered Intermediary. We doubled the number of Registered Intermediaries at the end of 2015 to increase the number available to help vulnerable and intimidated victims and witnesses give evidence.
We are also rolling out recorded pre-trial cross-examination in the Crown Courts from next year so that vulnerable witnesses do not have to give their evidence at trial. In addition to this, we are requiring publicly-funded advocates in sexual offences cases to undertake specialist training on working with vulnerable victims and witnesses.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when she plans to start the national roll-out of pre-recorded cross-examination for young vulnerable witnesses following the pilot of section 28 of the Youth and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when she plans to start the national roll-out of pre-recorded cross-examination for young vulnerable witnesses following the pilot of section 28 of the Youth and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.
The roll-out of pre-trial cross examination for all vulnerable witnesses, including children, will commence in January 2017. The roll-out across all Crown Courts should be complete by the end of the year.