1-20 of 625 results for subject:Finance
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.22 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Finance
- We searched for
- subject_t:Finance OR subject_ses:91257
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answers of 22 November 2016 to Questions 53110, 53111 and 53107, how many pharmacies will qualify for funding from the Pharmacy Access Scheme in (a) the East Riding of Yorkshire, (b) South West Surrey constituency, (c) Ludlow constituency, (d)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answers of 22 November 2016 to Questions 53110, 53111 and 53107, how many pharmacies will qualify for funding from the Pharmacy Access Scheme in (a) the East Riding of Yorkshire, (b) South West Surrey constituency, (c) Ludlow constituency, (d)...
Details of the pharmacies eligible for payment under the Pharmacy Access Scheme are available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/community-pharmacy-reforms
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answers of 22 November 2016 to Questions 53110, 53111 and 53107, how many pharmacies qualify for Pharmacy Access Scheme funding in each decile of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answers of 22 November 2016 to Questions 53110, 53111 and 53107, how many pharmacies qualify for Pharmacy Access Scheme funding in each decile of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation.
Reviews of eligibility for pharmacies that may have narrowly missed out on the Pharmacy Access Scheme through the distance criteria are currently ongoing. Final numbers are therefore not yet available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the effect of changes to community pharmacy funding on the delivery of pharmaceutical services in Greater Manchester; and whether it is his intention to devolve (a) responsibility for and (b) funding of pharmacies to the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the effect of changes to community pharmacy funding on the delivery of pharmaceutical services in Greater Manchester; and whether it is his intention to devolve (a) responsibility for and (b) funding of pharmacies to the...
We have made no such assessment.
The Government welcomes the progress that has already been made by Greater Manchester partners as they implement their ground-breaking devolution deal. The Department and other national partners continue to work with and support Greater Manchester as it realises its ambitious plans for transforming its health and social care system.
Discussions with Greater Manchester are ongoing. However there are currently no plans to devolve responsibility and funding for community pharmacies, under the Cities and Local Devolution Act 2016, to the Greater Manchester Combined Authority.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the potential effect on NHS winter planning for 2016-17 of changes in pharmacy funding in the period from December 2016 to April 2017.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the potential effect on NHS winter planning for 2016-17 of changes in pharmacy funding in the period from December 2016 to April 2017.
Community pharmacy will continue to play an integral role in National Health Service planning for this winter.
Building on last year’s successful introduction of the national Influenza Adult Vaccination Service delivered through community pharmacies, pharmacists are again providing ‘flu vaccinations to eligible patients in this ‘flu season. Over 747,500 vaccinations have been carried out so far this year – more than for the whole of the 2015-16 season.
As part of our package of reform, we are helping community pharmacy to play a greater role. For example, we want community pharmacy to be seen as the first port of call for minor ailments, helping to reduce pressure on the rest of the system. This season’s Stay Well This Winter campaign points people to visit their pharmacist at the earliest signs of feeling unwell, and before their condition gets more serious, to prevent them ending up at their general practice or emergency care department.
In addition, a new community pharmacy pilot service, the NHS urgent medicines supply advanced service, is being rolled out by NHS England this winter starting from December 2016 and running until the end of March 2018. The pilot service will see NHS111 referring requests for urgent medicines to a community pharmacy, where appropriate, relieving pressure on urgent and emergency care services by shifting this demand from general practitioner out of hours providers. This is being funded by the new Pharmacy Integration Fund and will be evaluated to inform future commissioning decisions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will estimate the number of pharmacies in Hull which are at risk of closure in (a) 2016-17 and (b) 2017-18 as a result of planned changes to community pharmacy funding.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will estimate the number of pharmacies in Hull which are at risk of closure in (a) 2016-17 and (b) 2017-18 as a result of planned changes to community pharmacy funding.
The reforms to community pharmacy are about improving services for patients and the public and securing efficiencies and savings. Although it is possible that the closure of some pharmacies may result from the savings we need to make, that is not our aim. We are not able to assess which pharmacies may close because we do not know the financial viability of individual businesses or the extent to which they derive income from services commissioned locally by the National Health Service or local authorities or have non-NHS related income.
We have created a Pharmacy Access Scheme (PhAS) to safeguard patient access in areas with fewer pharmacies and higher health needs. Details of the PhAS were published on 20 October 2016. All small and medium pharmacies that are located more than a mile from another pharmacy will qualify for the scheme.
Currently, 1,340 pharmacies qualify for the PhAS. One pharmacy within Kingston upon Hull North qualifies. It is within the lowest decile of deprivation.
PhAS pharmacies will receive fixed monthly payments, in addition to other fees and allowances, including the quality payment. These will be roughly equivalent to the funding reduction for each pharmacy, with a small efficiency saving. On average, this will equate to about £11,600 per annum in 2016/17 and about £17,600 per annum in 2017/18 for each eligible pharmacy.
Reviews of eligibility will be granted for pharmacies that may have narrowly missed out on the PhAS through the distance criteria, but are in areas of high deprivation and critical for patient access. This will cover pharmacies that are located in the top 20% most deprived areas in England, and which are located 0.8 miles or more from another pharmacy. For this purpose, we will look at the top 20% of Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs), when ranked by the Index of Multiple Deprivation. LSOAs are a standardised unit of geography in the United Kingdom. An LSOA varies in geographical size according to population density, but has an average population of about 1,600 in 2011.
Additional funding for successful reviews under this “near miss” criterion will be made available as required. This will influence the overall distribution of community pharmacy funding, including in deprived areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proportion of the planned funding from the Pharmacy Access Scheme will go to pharmacies based in each deprivation decile Lower-Layer Super Output Areas in (a) England and (b) Hull.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proportion of the planned funding from the Pharmacy Access Scheme will go to pharmacies based in each deprivation decile Lower-Layer Super Output Areas in (a) England and (b) Hull.
The reforms to community pharmacy are about improving services for patients and the public and securing efficiencies and savings. Although it is possible that the closure of some pharmacies may result from the savings we need to make, that is not our aim. We are not able to assess which pharmacies may close because we do not know the financial viability of individual businesses or the extent to which they derive income from services commissioned locally by the National Health Service or local authorities or have non-NHS related income.
We have created a Pharmacy Access Scheme (PhAS) to safeguard patient access in areas with fewer pharmacies and higher health needs. Details of the PhAS were published on 20 October 2016. All small and medium pharmacies that are located more than a mile from another pharmacy will qualify for the scheme.
Currently, 1,340 pharmacies qualify for the PhAS. One pharmacy within Kingston upon Hull North qualifies. It is within the lowest decile of deprivation.
PhAS pharmacies will receive fixed monthly payments, in addition to other fees and allowances, including the quality payment. These will be roughly equivalent to the funding reduction for each pharmacy, with a small efficiency saving. On average, this will equate to about £11,600 per annum in 2016/17 and about £17,600 per annum in 2017/18 for each eligible pharmacy.
Reviews of eligibility will be granted for pharmacies that may have narrowly missed out on the PhAS through the distance criteria, but are in areas of high deprivation and critical for patient access. This will cover pharmacies that are located in the top 20% most deprived areas in England, and which are located 0.8 miles or more from another pharmacy. For this purpose, we will look at the top 20% of Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs), when ranked by the Index of Multiple Deprivation. LSOAs are a standardised unit of geography in the United Kingdom. An LSOA varies in geographical size according to population density, but has an average population of about 1,600 in 2011.
Additional funding for successful reviews under this “near miss” criterion will be made available as required. This will influence the overall distribution of community pharmacy funding, including in deprived areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proportion of the planned changes in community pharmacy funding in (a) 2016-17 and (b) 2017-18 will fall on pharmacies based in each deprivation decile Lower-Layer Super Output Areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what proportion of the planned changes in community pharmacy funding in (a) 2016-17 and (b) 2017-18 will fall on pharmacies based in each deprivation decile Lower-Layer Super Output Areas.
The reforms to community pharmacy are about improving services for patients and the public and securing efficiencies and savings. Although it is possible that the closure of some pharmacies may result from the savings we need to make, that is not our aim. We are not able to assess which pharmacies may close because we do not know the financial viability of individual businesses or the extent to which they derive income from services commissioned locally by the National Health Service or local authorities or have non-NHS related income.
We have created a Pharmacy Access Scheme (PhAS) to safeguard patient access in areas with fewer pharmacies and higher health needs. Details of the PhAS were published on 20 October 2016. All small and medium pharmacies that are located more than a mile from another pharmacy will qualify for the scheme.
Currently, 1,340 pharmacies qualify for the PhAS. One pharmacy within Kingston upon Hull North qualifies. It is within the lowest decile of deprivation.
PhAS pharmacies will receive fixed monthly payments, in addition to other fees and allowances, including the quality payment. These will be roughly equivalent to the funding reduction for each pharmacy, with a small efficiency saving. On average, this will equate to about £11,600 per annum in 2016/17 and about £17,600 per annum in 2017/18 for each eligible pharmacy.
Reviews of eligibility will be granted for pharmacies that may have narrowly missed out on the PhAS through the distance criteria, but are in areas of high deprivation and critical for patient access. This will cover pharmacies that are located in the top 20% most deprived areas in England, and which are located 0.8 miles or more from another pharmacy. For this purpose, we will look at the top 20% of Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs), when ranked by the Index of Multiple Deprivation. LSOAs are a standardised unit of geography in the United Kingdom. An LSOA varies in geographical size according to population density, but has an average population of about 1,600 in 2011.
Additional funding for successful reviews under this “near miss” criterion will be made available as required. This will influence the overall distribution of community pharmacy funding, including in deprived areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the time it will take community pharmacies to make adequate preparations for planned changes to their funding.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the time it will take community pharmacies to make adequate preparations for planned changes to their funding.
The changes related to Community Pharmacy in 2016/17 and beyond were announced on 20 October, which gives six weeks’ notice before the changes are implemented on 1 December. The sector has been aware since 17 December 2015 of the planned funding reduction for the 2016/17 financial year and the proposed timescales for implementing it. Indeed the resolution to be implemented in 2016/17 is £57 million lower than that initially proposed. We have provided information on the changes so that pharmacy contractors can make adequate preparations.
On 20 October 2016, the Government announced a new funding settlement for contractors providing NHS pharmaceutical services under the community pharmacy contractual framework. Compared to 2015/16 levels, the funding settlement includes a reduction of 4% in 2016/17 and a further 3.4% in 2017/18. This briefing includes constituency data on pharmacies, including a list of those expected to be eligible for the Pharmacy Access Scheme. There will be an Opposition Day debate on community pharmacies on Wednesday 2 November 2016 in the Commons chamber.
On 20 October 2016, the Government announced a new funding settlement for contractors providing NHS pharmaceutical services under the community pharmacy contractual framework. Compared to 2015/16 levels, the funding settlement includes a reduction of 4% in 2016/17 and a further 3.4% in 2017/18. This briefing includes constituency data on pharmacies,...
I beg to move,
That this House notes that community pharmacies are valued assets that offer face-to-face healthcare advice which relieves pressure on other NHS services; calls on the Government to rethink its changes to community pharmacy funding; and further calls on the Government to ensure that community pharmacies are protected...
I beg to move,
That this House notes that community pharmacies are valued assets that offer face-to-face healthcare advice which relieves pressure on other NHS services; calls on the Government to rethink its changes to community pharmacy funding; and further calls on the Government to ensure that community pharmacies are protected...
We have had a lot of correspondence from local pharmacists and their customers worried about essential parts of the local community such as businesses, but is it not also the case that, with massive cuts in acute services and with primary care under pressure, those pharmacies provide an essential and...
We have had a lot of correspondence from local pharmacists and their customers worried about essential parts of the local community such as businesses, but is it not also the case that, with massive cuts in acute services and with primary care under pressure, those pharmacies provide an essential and...
My hon. Friend has anticipated my argument—I could probably sit down now that he has put it so eloquently, but I shall plough on while I have the indulgence of the House.
I was saying that the right hon. Member for North East Bedfordshire had said that the cuts might lead...
My hon. Friend has anticipated my argument—I could probably sit down now that he has put it so eloquently, but I shall plough on while I have the indulgence of the House.
I was saying that the right hon. Member for North East Bedfordshire had said that the cuts might lead...
rose—
rose—
rose—
rose—
Because she represents my mother’s home town, I will give way first to my hon. Friend the Member for Stretford and Urmston.
Because she represents my mother’s home town, I will give way first to my hon. Friend the Member for Stretford and Urmston.
It is a privilege to represent my hon. Friend’s mother, and he, of course, knows my constituency well. The constituency has high levels of deprivation, and our primary care services face incredible pressure owing to unsuitable practice premises and the difficulty of recruiting GPs. Does my hon. Friend agree that...
It is a privilege to represent my hon. Friend’s mother, and he, of course, knows my constituency well. The constituency has high levels of deprivation, and our primary care services face incredible pressure owing to unsuitable practice premises and the difficulty of recruiting GPs. Does my hon. Friend agree that...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is why the cuts have aroused so much opposition from not just Labour but Conservative Members.
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is why the cuts have aroused so much opposition from not just Labour but Conservative Members.
My hon. Friend has made a powerful point, which completely blows apart many of the arguments that the Government have advanced in recent years.
My hon. Friend has made a powerful point, which completely blows apart many of the arguments that the Government have advanced in recent years.
Given the clustering of pharmacies, does the hon. Gentleman believe that no better way of funding the service can be envisaged?
Given the clustering of pharmacies, does the hon. Gentleman believe that no better way of funding the service can be envisaged?
The cuts are not aimed at clusters. They are completely arbitrary, and they will result in the closure of many pharmacies in some of the most deprived parts of the country.
The cuts are not aimed at clusters. They are completely arbitrary, and they will result in the closure of many pharmacies in some of the most deprived parts of the country.