Skip to main content

1-20 of 430 results for subject:USA

Year X
2016
Subject X
Iraq Committee of Inquiry

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Iraq Committee of Inquiry (430)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No, absolutely not.

To say that I might accept that there was an ingrained belief, genuinely held, is not to endorse or accept that belief, or to say that it was a wise belief. It was a foolish and rash belief that was, in some ways, deluded.

Alongside that ingrained belief, the...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc495-6
House
House of Commons

So we now have the Chilcot report. Seven long years we have waited for this report of 2.6 million words. It has cost a huge amount of money. After seven years, Sir John Chilcot comes up with this sentence:

“We have concluded that the UK chose to join the invasion of...

Member
David Amess (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc472-4
House
House of Commons

I have some things to say about the then Speaker—I will get on to that fairly quickly—but first I will set the context. There was growing unease, certainly from the time of the Crawford talks between Prime Minister Blair and the US President George W. Bush, that we were being...

Member
Graham Allen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc477-9
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for reminding us of that, and he is right. This is why it is important to set out the context of what that day was like. It was a horrible, ugly, dreadful day, and we can never get around some of the things...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc463-4
House
House of Commons

I do not think that we are saying different things. I am not suggesting that there was intentional deceit. What I am suggesting is that many of us in this place did not question sufficiently the evidence that was before us. The report from the Joint Intelligence Committee was full...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc453-4
House
House of Commons

I suggest that Iraq 2003 ranks with Suez in a catalogue of British foreign policy disasters. It cost the lives of more than 200 British nationals and many tens of thousands of Iraqi nationals and citizens, and set in train a terrible sequence of events, including a vicious civil war...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc452-3
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend. At some point, there is always the issue of deciding. Every debate about intervention since 2003 has taken place in the shadow of this decision. Iraq has already increased the threshold for military action and the Chilcot report will raise it further. There...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc451-2
House
House of Commons

I shall make a little more progress first.

My last point leads me to a second question. I hope that I have, in effect, shown that when the Labour Government of the day said to the House that they believed there were weapons of mass destruction they were not lying, and...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c447
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak in this debate, and to follow the previous speakers, who have a great wealth and depth of information and knowledge to bring to it. If I wanted to sum up my comments I would say, “Mistakes made and lessons learned.”

British forces peaked at 46,000...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc456-9
House
House of Commons

I would not go quite that far, because I am more kindly than my hon. Friend. My recollection is that the Leader of the Opposition got this completely and utterly wrong. The official Opposition failed in their constitutional duty to ask the difficult questions and hold the Government to account....

Member
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c476
House
House of Commons

We have taken a lot of measures to involve the reserves more closely with the regulars now. After Iraq, we have been learning more rapidly the lessons from each deployment, particularly those from Afghanistan, to ensure that in future we do not have to wait for the kind of report...

Member
Michael Fallon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc516-7
House
House of Commons

Debate resumed (Order, 13 July). Question again proposed, That this House has considered the Report of the Iraq Inquiry. Agreed to on question. Part 2 of 2.

Lead member
Michael Fallon; Tobias Ellwood
Answering member
Clive Lewis
Department
Ministry of Defence; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc441-518
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c448
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c472
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much for calling me, Mr Speaker. I shall endeavour to follow your injunction to be brief. There is a very good reason to be brief at this stage of consideration of the Chilcot report, and that is that we have had very little time to consider a...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc442-3
House
House of Commons

I welcome the right hon. Gentleman’s useful approach in going back to the primary sources. Does not the information to which he refers, though, highlight just how dangerous it is to go to war on the basis of intelligence alone, which is essentially what marked the Iraq war out from...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c443
House
House of Commons

That is very tricky, because there are two scenarios where we can go to war. One is quite straightforward: somebody attacks us and we get on with it, because we are given no choice. The other is a situation such as that under discussion, where we have reason to believe...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 cc443-4
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that, in 2003, the House voted not just, or even mainly, on the intelligence? If you look at the debate, Mr Speaker, you will see that the House voted on Saddam Hussein’s repeated and unprecedented non-compliance with mandatory United Nations resolutions and on his...

Member
Ben Bradshaw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c444
House
House of Commons

I agree with a great deal of what the right hon. Gentleman has just said. Although it is not a matter of primary concern to us now, the fact is that Saddam Hussein was the author of his own misfortune. We must remember that, apart from being a brutal dictator,...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c444
House
House of Commons

I have great respect for my right hon. Friend, as he will know. However, I suggest that, on this issue, it was not just about intelligence sourcing from here. The United Nations inspectors at the time were pleading for more time because they could not find the WMDs upon which...

Member
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
613 c444
House
House of Commons