Skip to main content

1-16 of 16 results for subject:Schools

Year X
2016
Subject X
LGBT+ people

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
LGBT+ people (16)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what recent steps the Government has taken to tackle homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Stuart Andrew (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2016
Reference
56245
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Nicky Morgan
Department
Department for Education
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
7 July 2016
Reference
Cm. 9301
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to say that we must ensure that there is an absolutely inclusive education. I do not want to see any young person missing a day of education, and certainly not because they are worried about being made fun of or not being able to be who they are. The hon. Gentleman will know that I have already announced over £3 million for specific homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying. That is having an effect. I pay tribute to the charities who are working across the country to roll that out and I look forward to continuing to support, and to expand, that work.

Answered by
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 July 2016
Reference
612 c602
House
House of Commons

When research shows that six out of 10 LGBT students have experienced homophobic bullying, there is much to be done to improve life for LGBT pupils. Following her support for UK school diversity week, what plans does the Secretary of State have to ensure schools offer an LGBT-inclusive education?

Asked by
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2016
Reference
612 c602
House
House of Commons

What steps his Department is taking to ensure that all schools teach awareness of LGBT issues in an age-appropriate manner.

Asked by
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
904442; 608 c500
House
House of Commons

All women affected by faster equalisation reach state pension age under the new state pension system, which is more generous to many women than the previous system. In the first 10 years, around 650,000 will receive £8 per week more on average, due to the new state pension valuation.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c500
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister aware of the recent Dutch case of a woman who was affected by changes to her retirement age, with more notice than many women in the UK have received? In that case it was found that the woman’s human rights had been breached. Does the Minister think women in this country have had their human rights breached by the action that his Government have taken?

Asked by
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c500
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will be aware that the Dutch authorities are appealing that decision.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c500
House
House of Commons

Nobody denies that the state pension age needed to be reformed, but it is the transitional arrangements that the Government have or have not put in place that have caused so much consternation. I cannot help wondering whether a cynical calculation has been made that those women will have reached retirement age anyway by the next general election. May I ask a straightforward question? Do the Government genuinely believe that the transitional arrangements are fair—yes or no?

Asked by
Christian Matheson (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c500
House
House of Commons

The transitional arrangements that were put in place in 2011 were debated in both Houses. The hon. Gentleman will be aware that initially it was proposed that the equalisation should be fast-tracked by two years. Following various debates and intensive negotiations, that was reduced to 18 months, at a cost to the Treasury of £1.1 billion. Transitional arrangements were made in 2011 and the Government have no plans to review them.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c500
House
House of Commons

We need to accept that equalisation was necessary, first, because it was required by European Union directive and, secondly, because people are living longer. Women on the whole recognise that we need to equalise the state pension ages. We are not doing so as fast as some other countries, such as Germany and Denmark, which have already achieved what we are seeking to do.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c501
House
House of Commons

Following the resignation of the previous Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Pensions Minister Baroness Altmann stated that he had

“often been obstructive to my efforts to resolve important pensions policy issues such as on women’s pensions.”

Now that the main impediment to change has been removed from Government, when can we expect an update on progress for the women of WASPI—Women Against State Pension Inequality—who have been so unfairly treated for so long?

Asked by
Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c501
House
House of Commons

I do not agree with the hon. Lady’s assessment. As I said in my previous answer, the Government do not intend to review this matter because it was heavily debated and dealt with in 2011.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c501
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his response, but what is the purpose of the Department and, indeed, of the women and equalities ministerial role if they do not address the inequalities that exist? We have had four parliamentary debates on the issue, MPs have asked dozens of questions, 186,000 people have signed a petition and we voted in this House to agree that the policy is unfair, so after all that, why is the Minister still prepared to defend an indefensible position?

Asked by
Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c501
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady was not in the House in 2011, but the issue, as I said, was heavily debated. A vote was taken after a Backbench Business Committee debate. As she knows only too well, a point of order was raised after that debate and the person sitting in the Chair at the time happened to be the first and former Chairman of the Backbench Business Committee. She made it abundantly clear that votes taken after debates tabled by the Backbench Business Committee are not binding on the Government.

Answered by
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 April 2016
Reference
608 c501
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans she has to include LGBT issues in sex and relationship education in schools.

Asked by
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 February 2016
Reference
25673
House
House of Commons