1-20 of 34 results for subject:"Private education"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.245 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.01 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Private education"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Private education" OR subject_t:"Independent schools" OR subject_t:"Private schools" OR subject_t:"Public schools" OR subject_ses:92588
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police withholding a Special Investigation Branch report of Lt. Col. Jolleys' circumstances from a fraud trial in which he was convicted of failing to declare changes to his circumstances.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police withholding a Special Investigation Branch report of Lt. Col. Jolleys' circumstances from a fraud trial in which he was convicted of failing to declare changes to his circumstances.
A Special Investigation Branch Report was served as evidence at Lt Col Jolleys' trial and was provided to his Defence team pre-trial.
It will take time to gather the further information and I will write to the hon. Member shortly.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police denying Lt. Col. Jolley his own military records for him to use at his trial in 2013.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police denying Lt. Col. Jolley his own military records for him to use at his trial in 2013.
A Special Investigation Branch Report was served as evidence at Lt Col Jolleys' trial and was provided to his Defence team pre-trial.
It will take time to gather the further information and I will write to the hon. Member shortly.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police failing to disclose army doctors', chaplains', commanding officers' and Lt. Col. Jolleys' own statement of his circumstances.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the reasons were for the Ministry of Defence Police failing to disclose army doctors', chaplains', commanding officers' and Lt. Col. Jolleys' own statement of his circumstances.
A Special Investigation Branch Report was served as evidence at Lt Col Jolleys' trial and was provided to his Defence team pre-trial.
It will take time to gather the further information and I will write to the hon. Member shortly.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of serving personnel who have received continuity of education allowance in the last five years were (a) serving overseas and (b) in the UK at the time of claiming that allowance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of serving personnel who have received continuity of education allowance in the last five years were (a) serving overseas and (b) in the UK at the time of claiming that allowance.
The overarching principles of the Continuous Education Allowance (CEA) are accompanied service and educational continuity, i.e. the claimant must be accompanied by their immediate family at their duty station and a child must complete the stage of education at the school for which the allowance is claimed. CEA is available to all Service personnel irrespective of their rank or assignment location.
CEA was reviewed as part of the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 following which improvements in governance achieved a reduction of costs by around £20 million per annum along with an associated reduction in the numbers of claimants both in the UK and overseas. Work continues to further reduce the cost of the allowance.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel who have received CEA since 2008 and where they were serving at the time of their claim.
Academic Year | Total Claimants* | UK | Overseas | ||
% | % | ||||
2008/09 | 5,080 | 4,256 | 84 | 824 | 16 |
2009/10 | 5,203 | 4,377 | 84 | 826 | 16 |
2010/11 | 5,135 | 4,356 | 85 | 779 | 15 |
2011/12 | 4,588 | 3,820 | 83 | 768 | 17 |
2012/13 | 3,858 | 3,232 | 84 | 626 | 16 |
2013/14 | 3,409 | 2,824 | 83 | 585 | 17 |
2014/15 | 3,201 | 2,602 | 81 | 599 | 19 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel, by rank who have received CEA since 2008.
Nato Rank | Academic Year* | ||||||
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | 2014/15 | |
Other Rank 2 | 42 | 56 | 65 | 53 | 39 | 32 | 29 |
Other Rank 3 | 33 | 46 | 71 | 74 | 52 | 51 | 39 |
Other Rank 4 | 292 | 289 | 299 | 294 | 245 | 206 | 201 |
Other Rank 6 | 538 | 569 | 568 | 451 | 376 | 313 | 293 |
Other Rank 7 | 554 | 550 | 531 | 461 | 365 | 306 | 306 |
Other Rank 8 | 361 | 397 | 372 | 295 | 251 | 221 | 209 |
Other Rank 9 | 216 | 232 | 221 | 215 | 189 | 155 | 128 |
Officer 1 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Officer 2 | 552 | 570 | 585 | 533 | 419 | 382 | 341 |
Officer 3 | 877 | 884 | 892 | 796 | 679 | 591 | 562 |
Officer 4 | 1,008 | 1,002 | 964 | 878 | 743 | 679 | 628 |
Officer 5 | 420 | 418 | 397 | 374 | 338 | 325 | 320 |
Officer 6 | 140 | 143 | 126 | 124 | 121 | 107 | 104 |
Officer 7 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 |
Officer 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
Officer 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 5,080 | 5,203 | 5,135 | 4,588 | 3,858 | 3,409 | 3,201 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
An explanation of the Nato Rank Code system is available at this link:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many personnel of each rank have claimed the continuity of education allowance in the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many personnel of each rank have claimed the continuity of education allowance in the last five years.
The overarching principles of the Continuous Education Allowance (CEA) are accompanied service and educational continuity, i.e. the claimant must be accompanied by their immediate family at their duty station and a child must complete the stage of education at the school for which the allowance is claimed. CEA is available to all Service personnel irrespective of their rank or assignment location.
CEA was reviewed as part of the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 following which improvements in governance achieved a reduction of costs by around £20 million per annum along with an associated reduction in the numbers of claimants both in the UK and overseas. Work continues to further reduce the cost of the allowance.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel who have received CEA since 2008 and where they were serving at the time of their claim.
Academic Year | Total Claimants* | UK | Overseas | ||
% | % | ||||
2008/09 | 5,080 | 4,256 | 84 | 824 | 16 |
2009/10 | 5,203 | 4,377 | 84 | 826 | 16 |
2010/11 | 5,135 | 4,356 | 85 | 779 | 15 |
2011/12 | 4,588 | 3,820 | 83 | 768 | 17 |
2012/13 | 3,858 | 3,232 | 84 | 626 | 16 |
2013/14 | 3,409 | 2,824 | 83 | 585 | 17 |
2014/15 | 3,201 | 2,602 | 81 | 599 | 19 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel, by rank who have received CEA since 2008.
Nato Rank | Academic Year* | ||||||
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | 2014/15 | |
Other Rank 2 | 42 | 56 | 65 | 53 | 39 | 32 | 29 |
Other Rank 3 | 33 | 46 | 71 | 74 | 52 | 51 | 39 |
Other Rank 4 | 292 | 289 | 299 | 294 | 245 | 206 | 201 |
Other Rank 6 | 538 | 569 | 568 | 451 | 376 | 313 | 293 |
Other Rank 7 | 554 | 550 | 531 | 461 | 365 | 306 | 306 |
Other Rank 8 | 361 | 397 | 372 | 295 | 251 | 221 | 209 |
Other Rank 9 | 216 | 232 | 221 | 215 | 189 | 155 | 128 |
Officer 1 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Officer 2 | 552 | 570 | 585 | 533 | 419 | 382 | 341 |
Officer 3 | 877 | 884 | 892 | 796 | 679 | 591 | 562 |
Officer 4 | 1,008 | 1,002 | 964 | 878 | 743 | 679 | 628 |
Officer 5 | 420 | 418 | 397 | 374 | 338 | 325 | 320 |
Officer 6 | 140 | 143 | 126 | 124 | 121 | 107 | 104 |
Officer 7 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 |
Officer 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
Officer 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 5,080 | 5,203 | 5,135 | 4,588 | 3,858 | 3,409 | 3,201 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
An explanation of the Nato Rank Code system is available at this link:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the criteria are for serving armed forces personnel to be eligible to claim the continuity of education allowance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the criteria are for serving armed forces personnel to be eligible to claim the continuity of education allowance.
The overarching principles of the Continuous Education Allowance (CEA) are accompanied service and educational continuity, i.e. the claimant must be accompanied by their immediate family at their duty station and a child must complete the stage of education at the school for which the allowance is claimed. CEA is available to all Service personnel irrespective of their rank or assignment location.
CEA was reviewed as part of the Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 following which improvements in governance achieved a reduction of costs by around £20 million per annum along with an associated reduction in the numbers of claimants both in the UK and overseas. Work continues to further reduce the cost of the allowance.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel who have received CEA since 2008 and where they were serving at the time of their claim.
Academic Year | Total Claimants* | UK | Overseas | ||
% | % | ||||
2008/09 | 5,080 | 4,256 | 84 | 824 | 16 |
2009/10 | 5,203 | 4,377 | 84 | 826 | 16 |
2010/11 | 5,135 | 4,356 | 85 | 779 | 15 |
2011/12 | 4,588 | 3,820 | 83 | 768 | 17 |
2012/13 | 3,858 | 3,232 | 84 | 626 | 16 |
2013/14 | 3,409 | 2,824 | 83 | 585 | 17 |
2014/15 | 3,201 | 2,602 | 81 | 599 | 19 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
The table below shows the number of Service personnel, by rank who have received CEA since 2008.
Nato Rank | Academic Year* | ||||||
2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | 2014/15 | |
Other Rank 2 | 42 | 56 | 65 | 53 | 39 | 32 | 29 |
Other Rank 3 | 33 | 46 | 71 | 74 | 52 | 51 | 39 |
Other Rank 4 | 292 | 289 | 299 | 294 | 245 | 206 | 201 |
Other Rank 6 | 538 | 569 | 568 | 451 | 376 | 313 | 293 |
Other Rank 7 | 554 | 550 | 531 | 461 | 365 | 306 | 306 |
Other Rank 8 | 361 | 397 | 372 | 295 | 251 | 221 | 209 |
Other Rank 9 | 216 | 232 | 221 | 215 | 189 | 155 | 128 |
Officer 1 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Officer 2 | 552 | 570 | 585 | 533 | 419 | 382 | 341 |
Officer 3 | 877 | 884 | 892 | 796 | 679 | 591 | 562 |
Officer 4 | 1,008 | 1,002 | 964 | 878 | 743 | 679 | 628 |
Officer 5 | 420 | 418 | 397 | 374 | 338 | 325 | 320 |
Officer 6 | 140 | 143 | 126 | 124 | 121 | 107 | 104 |
Officer 7 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 |
Officer 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
Officer 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 5,080 | 5,203 | 5,135 | 4,588 | 3,858 | 3,409 | 3,201 |
* Number of claimants based on Joint Personnel Administration data relating to CEA payments made during the final term (i.e. Summer Term) of each Academic Year 2008/09 to 2014/15.
An explanation of the Nato Rank Code system is available at this link:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent in Continuity of Education Allowance in independent schools in Scotland in financial year 2014-15; how many children were in receipt of Continuity of Education Allowance in Scottish schools in that year; and in which five schools had...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department spent in Continuity of Education Allowance in independent schools in Scotland in financial year 2014-15; how many children were in receipt of Continuity of Education Allowance in Scottish schools in that year; and in which five schools had...
The total amount spent on Continuity of Education Allowance in independent schools in Scotland for financial year 2014-15 was £2,396,830 which has reduced from £3,647,810 for financial year 2008-09. 173 children were in receipt of Continuity of Education Allowance in Scottish schools for financial year 2014-15. The table below shows which five schools had the highest Continuity of Education Allowance spend in Scotland for that year.
School |
Fettes College - Edinburgh |
Strathallan School - Forgandenny |
Lomond School - Helensburgh |
Mary Erskine & Syewart Melville College |
Gordonstoun School - Elgin |
In line with Departmental Policy, all figures of five or more have been rounded to the nearest five.
I. Letter dated 21/07/2015 from Oliver Letwin MP to John Benger MP regarding letter from Charity Commission for deposit in the Libraries of the House. 1 p. II. Letter dated 20/07/2015 from Sarah Atkinson, Director of Policy and Communications, Charity Commission to Julie Robinson, General Secretary of the Independent Schools Council regarding the public benefit of independent schools. 2 p.
I. Letter dated 21/07/2015 from Oliver Letwin MP to John Benger MP regarding letter from Charity Commission for deposit in the Libraries of the House. 1 p. II. Letter dated 20/07/2015 from Sarah Atkinson, Director of Policy and Communications, Charity Commission to Julie Robinson, General Secretary of the Independent Schools...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many civil servants employed through the Northern Ireland graduate fast-track scheme between 1 June 2010 and 1 June 2015 were educated at (1) private, and (2) state, schools.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many civil servants employed through the Northern Ireland graduate fast-track scheme between 1 June 2010 and 1 June 2015 were educated at (1) private, and (2) state, schools.
The Northern Ireland graduate fast track scheme is run by the Northern Ireland Civil Service. The Government does not hold information relating to the Northern Ireland fast track scheme.
My Lords, we return to a simplified version of amendments which the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, and I moved in Committee. Between the two stages there have been a number of discussions with the Minister, for which I thank him, and with the Independent Schools Council along with others. I...
My Lords, we return to a simplified version of amendments which the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, and I moved in Committee. Between the two stages there have been a number of discussions with the Minister, for which I thank him, and with the Independent Schools Council along with others. I...
My Lords, the amendment is in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Glentoran. The principles behind the amendment are reflected in the amendment with which it is coupled, standing in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Saltaire, in the context of music, drama and...
My Lords, the amendment is in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Glentoran. The principles behind the amendment are reflected in the amendment with which it is coupled, standing in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Saltaire, in the context of music, drama and...
I will, if I may, very briefly second what the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, has said. We will take this away and consider whether we should provide a different form of words. I have to say I was puzzled by the quotation from Ofsted—
I will, if I may, very briefly second what the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, has said. We will take this away and consider whether we should provide a different form of words. I have to say I was puzzled by the quotation from Ofsted—
My Lords, I tabled this amendment to help clarify what Clause 13 is not, as much as what it is. I would like to ask the Minister how widely this clause can be interpreted. I do not want to wake up one morning and find that it means something quite...
My Lords, I tabled this amendment to help clarify what Clause 13 is not, as much as what it is. I would like to ask the Minister how widely this clause can be interpreted. I do not want to wake up one morning and find that it means something quite...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department has spent on private school fees for the families of armed forces personnel in each year since 2010; and how much his Department has spent on each such educational establishment in that time.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department has spent on private school fees for the families of armed forces personnel in each year since 2010; and how much his Department has spent on each such educational establishment in that time.
The information requested in relation to school fees is provided in the table below. Information relating to individual schools could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Continuity of Education (CEA) allowance is provided to assist Service personnel to achieve continuity of education for their children that would otherwise be denied if their children accompanied them on frequent and consecutive assignments. These payments are made by the Ministry of Defence to individual Service personnel claimants, and not to the educational establishments/schools attended by the children to whom the claims relate.
The coalition Government reviewed this scheme as part of the Strategic Defence and Security Review and in December 2010 made changes which have delivered savings of £20 million each year and an associated reduction in claimants compared to the cost of the scheme as inherited in 2010.
Spend by financial year on CEA including special educational needs supplement and payment of income tax liability.
Financial Year | FY 2009-10 | FY 2010-11 | FY 2011-12 | FY 2012-13 | FY 2013-14 | FY 2014-15 |
Cost (£ million) | 110.9 | 114.5 | 110.8 | 98.9 | 89.3 | 84.5 |
Claimants | 6,020 | 6,090 | 5,680 | 4,950 | 4,300 | 3,880 |
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to reduce inequality between those who are educated privately and those who are state-educated.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to reduce inequality between those who are educated privately and those who are state-educated.
We are determined to ensure that every child, regardless of background is given an education which allows them to realise their potential. That is why our reforms place high expectations at the heart of our school system, with a rigorous new curriculum, world class exams and a new accountability system which rewards those schools that encourage every child to achieve their best. In addition, with the new Education and Adoption Bill, we will speed up the process for tackling failing schools and extend our powers into coasting schools. With these measures, we want all schools to be good or outstanding, certainly as good as the best in the independent sector.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that all independent schools are abiding by the Independent Schools Regulations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that all independent schools are abiding by the Independent Schools Regulations.
Meeting the independent school standards is a condition of continued registration for independent schools. All of them are inspected on a regular cycle. If a school does not meet the required standards, the Department for Education takes appropriate regulatory action to ensure that the situation is rectified in the shortest possible time, or the school is closed.
The department has underpinned this approach by commencing the relevant provisions of the Education and Skills Act 2008 (‘the Act’), so that the role of the three independent inspectorates, and Ofsted’s role in quality assurance of those inspectorates, is put on a statutory footing. In accordance with the Act, the independent school standards were revised and strengthened from January 2015, introducing a new leadership and management standard. These changes form part of the reform programme outlined by Lord Nash in his letter of 28 March 2014 to the Chair of the Select Committee.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that independent schools are not found to be in breach of statutory regulations as a result of the introduction of retrospective prohibition checks on teaching staff.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that independent schools are not found to be in breach of statutory regulations as a result of the introduction of retrospective prohibition checks on teaching staff.
From 5 January 2015, the independent school standards require that schools check both existing and new teaching staff to determine whether a prohibition order or interim prohibition made by the Secretary of State exists for any member of their teaching staff.
The checks are only retrospective in the sense that schools must confirm that existing staff, as well as new appointments, are not subject to a prohibition order. The prohibition order regime began in April 2012, and the standard does not distinguish between staff appointed before or after 5 January 2015, so existing staff should be checked too. We believe that this is entirely justified. The teacher standards which form the basis of the prohibition regime apply to independent schools, and it would be invidious if a school was able to continue employing a prohibited member of staff simply because he or she was appointed before 2015. When a school is inspected, it should be able to demonstrate that it has either completed these checks (which can be done through the National College’s Easy Access system) or is well on the way to completion. If a school cannot do so, regulatory action is likely to follow.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what arrangements they are making to ensure that independent schools are in a position to comply with their statutory responsibilities to check that staff are not prohibited from involvement in the management of an independent school.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what arrangements they are making to ensure that independent schools are in a position to comply with their statutory responsibilities to check that staff are not prohibited from involvement in the management of an independent school.
The Department for Education is in discussion with the Disclosure and Barring Service about ways in which schools can do this with the minimum additional burden, and it is hoped that a process will be in place soon. At present no barring directions have been made under the regulations made in 2014 under section 128 of the Education and Skills Act 2008.
Lords question for short debate on what assessment they have made of the variety and diversity of schools within the independent education sector.
Lords question for short debate on what assessment they have made of the variety and diversity of schools within the independent education sector.
My Lords, I begin by declaring my interests as president of both the Independent Schools Association and of the Council for Independent Education.
The association provides a range of excellent services to its expanding membership—up from 300 thriving, mainly smaller schools, averaging under 400 pupils a few years ago to some...
My Lords, I begin by declaring my interests as president of both the Independent Schools Association and of the Council for Independent Education.
The association provides a range of excellent services to its expanding membership—up from 300 thriving, mainly smaller schools, averaging under 400 pupils a few years ago to some...