Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for legtitle:"Licensing Act 2003"

Year X
2013

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 26/10/2013 from Lord Taylor of Holbeach to Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate regarding the late night purchase of alcohol and powers to close premises. 2 p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
16 October 2013
Reference
DEP2013-1709
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister; that was a more encouraging reply than I had expected. I am glad that the scenario that he describes is likely to cover all of England. The dossiers that have been compiled on matters that concerned both Houses of Parliament in 2003 are very surprising. It was a major concern of the two Houses that there would be proper protection for residents in areas where they might find their peace damaged as a result of late-night licences. In my area the offences have been quite extraordinary. If, when I spoke during the Bill’s passage, I had thought that there would be behaviour of this kind between midnight and 3 o’clock in the morning in my area in south London, I would have been much more active about it. Is there is a way to protect older and vulnerable people from the disorder that comes from late-night drinking, particularly after people come out of venues? People who live in almshouses near me tell me that their lives have been made quite impossible.

Asked by
Viscount Falkland (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c72
House
House of Lords

There may be particularly vulnerable people, of course, and old people are among them. One of the things that we have done with the existing licensing laws is to rebalance the Licensing Act so that there is a vicinity test; as long as evidence exists within a local community concerning the disruption that can be caused by late-night drinking, it is able to submit this to the licensing authorities. I can give the noble Viscount more encouragement: Milton Keynes has also voted in favour of a late-night levy, which is likely to come in next year. The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill will also encourage the noble Lord; it is making its way through the Commons and will shortly arrive here, and will greatly empower communities in this regard.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c72
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government’s alcohol strategy puts the cost of alcohol harm to the economy as a whole at £21 billion. That includes £3.5 billion for the health service, where overstressed A&E departments, for example, have to cope with an influx of people after midnight who have drunk far too much. Has my noble friend any estimate of the benefits, in terms of reduced costs, of the Government repealing the 2003 Act altogether?

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c72
House
House of Lords

No, that calculation has not been made, but I can give my noble friend the figure for the cost to the health service: £7.3 billion for alcohol-related incidents.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c72
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I acknowledge that the Government have made some changes. However, is the noble Lord content that the rebalancing has moved sufficiently? Many people believe that it has not. During the debates in the Commons on

the Bill to which he has just referred, there have been attempts to extend the way in which licensing authorities can take into account public health issues. Given the Government’s commitment to devolution on public health issues, why will they not move on this front, in the way that the Scottish Government are now moving?

Asked by
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c72
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has taken a great interest in this subject. I have always valued his contributions and look forward to his contribution to the debates we are likely to have on this Bill. I am sure that these arguments will be presented when we have the opportunity. Meanwhile, I am grateful for his acknowledgment of the progress that the Government have made in this difficult area.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

Will my noble friend continue to liaise with the Department of Health to ensure that we reduce the number of people admitted to A&E departments who are clearly the worse for drink—often as a deliberate ploy, having had what they regard as a good night out? If we could tackle it from that end, perhaps we could help to move the culture change on even further.

Asked by
Baroness Browning (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords will know that there have been a number of ideas on this issue. Chief Constable Adrian Lee from Northamptonshire suggested the idea of drunk tanks, which I had to read about to understand. This has generated some public debate; it is the sort of thing which clearly the Government will look at, because anything that can relieve the burden on hospitals must be a good thing.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my usual interest. Is the Minister aware of the excellent project in Ipswich, Suffolk, that has been going on over the past year? On a voluntary basis, retailers, major supermarkets and off-licences, working with police and others, have withdrawn the sale of the strongest canned and bottled beers and lagers. On that voluntary basis, it seems to have had a beneficial effect on the quality of life for people, particularly in the centre of Ipswich, and has reduced anti-social behaviour. Does the Minister agree that this should be encouraged in other city centres?

Asked by
Lord Condon (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

Yes, I would certainly vouch for that. There has been a lot of co-operation from the retail trade. I met representatives of the Association of Convenience Stores at the Conservative party conference, where they had a meeting. They are very supportive of retail initiatives of this sort. This morning I met Richard Antcliff, the chief anti-social behaviour officer in Nottinghamshire, and I went to Nottingham to see the work being done in that city to reduce alcohol abuse. Communities can do an awful lot on this issue and the Home Office would encourage any such initiatives.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following on from the last question, does the noble Lord not agree that although there are obviously deficiencies in the way that the 2003 Act has operated,

which give rise to some of these difficulties, one of the main problems is the enormously wide availability of alcohol at very low prices? Do the Government have any plans at the moment to address that?

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c73
House
House of Lords

Licensing of alcohol in retail outlets is, of course, in the hands of licensing authorities, but the pricing has been challenged—and, indeed, I have been challenged by noble Lords in this House on this issue. The Government have announced the policy on this; there will be a policy whereby drink cannot be sold at cost plus duty plus VAT, which in effect puts a floor on cheap sales of alcohol. I think that that should be encouraged.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c74
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government have rebalanced the Licensing Act 2003 to give local communities stronger powers to achieve the Act’s objectives, including reducing crime

and disorder. For example, licensing authorities can now raise a contribution from premises that supply alcohol late at night towards the costs of policing and wider action. Newcastle is scheduled to be the first area to introduce a late-night levy, as it is called, on 1 November.

Answered by
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 c71
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the aims and objectives of the Licensing Act 2003 have been adequately met with regard to the control of social disorder resulting from late night drinking in residential areas.

Asked by
Viscount Falkland (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2013
Reference
748 cc71-4
House
House of Lords
Lead department / agency
Home Office
Type
Impact assessments
Date
1 September 2013
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Maria Miller
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
27 June 2013
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Motion that the draft Licensing Act 2003 (Descriptions of Entertainment) (Amendment) Order 2013, which was laid before this House on 22 April 2013, in the last Session of Parliament, be approved. Agreed to on question.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
12 June 2013
Reference
564 c455
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot
Answering member
Clive Efford
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
11 June 2013
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
5 June 2013
Reference
745 cc1178-9
House
House of Lords