Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:Reviews

Year X
2013
Subject X
Benefits rules

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Benefits rules (46)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move amendment 1, page 3, line 11, at end insert—

‘() Subsection (12) does not affect a person’s ability to apply for a revision or supersession of, or to appeal against, a decision to impose a penalty by reference to other grounds.’.

We tabled the amendment as a result...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c875
House
House of Commons

The Government have got themselves into a terrible mess. As we heard, they ignored the advice of the Social Security Advisory Committee—that appears to be a significant part of what went wrong—but I welcome the amendment, because a straightforward reading of the Bill might, and indeed does, suggest that if...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc875-6
House
House of Commons

Is it the Government’s intention to reclaim cash? Clearly, we are in a rather different situation from the one that obtains when somebody is sanctioned in the normal course of events, because the events to which the stockpile sanctions relate could have taken place a considerable time ago. How will...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c876
House
House of Commons

If the CPAG advice is correct, does my right hon. Friend have any idea by how much the £130 million could be reduced?

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c877
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend asks a good question, and the answer is in the impact assessment that the Government have produced, which distinguishes between the amount that would be incurred because of people who were sanctioned before 6 August 2012 and the amount incurred in respect of people sanctioned since the...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c877
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has made a couple of points. In respect of payments where decisions have been stockpiled, when we received the High Court judgment, we did not proceed to make any further sanctions decisions, but claimants who were subject to a stockpiled decision are aware of that: we...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c877
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c878
House
House of Commons

The new clause provides for a report on the operation of benefit sanctions affected by the provisions of the Bill. Again, I thank the right hon. Members for East Ham (Stephen Timms) and for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne) for their constructive approach to the Bill. We discussed this topic...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc878-9
House
House of Commons

I warmly welcome the new clause which, as the Minister has said, was proposed and suggested in the discussions between him and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, and me and my right hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne). It is something genuinely valuable...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc879-880
House
House of Commons

I am slightly confused. The right hon. Gentleman said that when people get sanctioned, they have no idea why, but I would have thought the first thing they would do, if they did not get

a letter or a warning about this, would be to go straight to Jobcentre Plus...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c880
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises an interesting and telling point. Why, indeed, do people not go to jobcentres to get an explanation? The reason is that it is very difficult for them to get through on the telephone, and if they do go and speak to somebody, they probably do not...

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc881-4
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow my right hon. Friend the Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms), and I say to him and other right hon. Friends on the Front Bench that if new clause 1 has emerged from their discussions with DWP Ministers, the Bill has provided at least...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c884
House
House of Commons

I have dealt with lots of soldiers in my life, some of whom are not very literate. One thing that always frightened them was letters. I have a feeling that people get sanctioned because they ignore the letter that comes through their letterbox and are frightened to open it because...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c885
House
House of Commons

New clause 1 presents an opportunity. I congratulate my right hon. Friends on the Opposition Front Bench on getting it agreed with the Government, but of course there are weaknesses and flaws that my right hon. Friend the Member for Wythenshawe and Sale East (Paul Goggins) has outlined.

There are genuine...

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc886-7
House
House of Commons

I want to begin by commenting on the remarks made by my right hon. Friend the Member for Wythenshawe and Sale East (Paul Goggins) to the hon. Member for Beckenham (Bob Stewart), whom I have known for 20 years, since he returned from Bosnia with the Cheshire Regiment. People whom...

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c887
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman, who has been a friend of mine for a long time, for giving way. One problem is that people who are hurt, mentally scarred or not as bright as they might be need a friend

to go with them to Jobcentre Plus. They need a...

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c887
House
House of Commons

If we developed this too far, Mr Hood, I would be outwith the scope of the amendment, but the hon. Gentleman is very perceptive and makes the point about people not understanding the documents or conversations they have had.

To move this forward we need to inject a degree of urgency....

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c888
House
House of Commons

I want to follow up on some of the issues that have been raised. I recently asked the Minister how many people had had sanctions imposed on them. He revealed that 540,610 sanctions relating to jobseeker’s allowance had been applied last year. In the same answer, he told me:

“Statistics on...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 cc888-9
House
House of Commons

We have had a helpful debate on the review. I note the comments of the right hon. Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms)—I think he actually asked 11 questions, but I will allow him an extra one. The scope of the review is set out in the new clause. I...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c889
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
560 c889
House
House of Commons