Skip to main content

1-2 of 2 results for subject:Defence

Year X
2013
Member X
Lord King of Bridgwater

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More
King of Bridgwater, Lord (2)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am particularly pleased to follow the noble Lord, Lord Levene, in this debate. I think your Lordships will recognise that nobody in the country can speak with more authority on the subjects that are part of the Bill than the noble Lord. He has had quite exceptional...

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 December 2013
Reference
750 cc740-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend the Minister said that the status quo is not an option, and certainly there needs to be a massive improvement in the procurement capabilities and efficiency of the Ministry of Defence; it is a long-standing problem. However, when my noble friend Lord Lee says that you cannot have a competition with only one entrant, is it not true that the competition now is between an outside contractor—Bechtel and its consortium—and an in-house resolution? If we do that, will he ensure, because it is essential, that there is more continuity and expertise, as has been referred to, in the procurement section of the MoD?

Asked by
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 November 2013
Reference
749 c1069
House
House of Lords