Skip to main content

1-20 of 922 results for subject:Audit

Year X
2010

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what measures are taken to audit payments made under HealthLink 3 in relation to provision of health facilities and services on St Helena; and whether the scheme provides the taxpayer with value for money.

Asked by
Lord Jones of Cheltenham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
5363; 723 c311WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Annual reports; House of Commons papers
Date
20 December 2010
Reference
HC 690 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
See also PAC report HC 785 2010-12
Date
20 December 2010
Reference
HC 567 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
16 December 2010
Reference
HC 491 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
European Scrutiny Committee
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
HC 428-xi 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
HC 685 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
European Scrutiny Committee
Date
8 December 2010
Reference
HC 428-x 2010-11
House
House of Commons

Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]. Lords committee stage debate (third day). Clause 4-7 amendments debated. Clauses 4-8 agreed without amendment. Committee adjourned. Grand committee held in the Moses Room

Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c1-36GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord sounds like the fellows in my college whose standard reaction to any proposal of mine is, ““We’ve always done it that way””. One peculiarity in the drafting of this Bill and of the charter is that everything is defined in terms of negatives. What we have in...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c34GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it may be convenient also to consider Amendments 31 and 32. When I first looked at Clause 5(3), it seemed fairly straightforward. It states that if the Government’s policies are relevant to the OBR’s performance of its duties, the office should not look at any alternative policies; that...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c25-6GC
House
House of Lords

36: Clause 6, page 3, line 10, leave out paragraph (b)

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c31GC
House
House of Lords

I support the amendment, at least in so far as it relates to Clause 5(2), for much the same reasons as those set out by the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell. These words are meant to be drawn either from the seven tenets of public life set by the Committee on...

Member
Lord Turnbull (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c32GC
House
House of Lords

We had a long debate on this issue at our previous meeting and I am not going to rehearse all the arguments. I suggested, out of frustration, that we were spending too long on this form of words, which, in slightly more words, actually had the same purpose as Amendment...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c27-8GC
House
House of Lords

While I agree with the Minister that doing an assessment yourself makes for a learning experience, having someone else do it makes for an even more pointed learning experience. I apologise to the Minister for the fact that he has been forced to speak half-heartedly about this amendment because he...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c14-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 25 is in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Peston. Everything that I have heard so far this afternoon in these brief debates confirms to me why my noble friend Lord Peston and I have been right to wonder whether the huge expense of...

Member
Lord Barnett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c15-6GC
House
House of Lords

37: Clause 7, page 3, line 16, leave out ““aim to””

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c34GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment, which has a whole clause to itself, is not difficult to understand. The Bill as drafted states: "““The Office must aim to carry out its functions efficiently and cost-effectively””." The amendment seeks to delete the words ““aim to”” so that it reads, ““The Office must carry...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c34GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, of course the OBR should be cost-effective and efficient—there is no question about that—and the amendment seeks to increase the requirement for it to be so. However, in reality the amendment would not change in substance the requirement on the OBR because, if it was ever challenged on...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c34-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am not sure whether this will help, but just to be clear, we are expecting the OBR to assess the impact of policies on forecasts. So there is no question of merits and demerits, other than that we are trying to exclude all questions of merit and demerit and...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c33GC
House
House of Lords

We have always done it that way.

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2010
Reference
723 c35GC
House
House of Lords