Skip to main content

1-20 of 54 results for subject:Misuse

Year X
2008
Subject X
Warnings

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Warnings (54)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am intending to move Amendments Nos. 24 and 25.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c421
House
House of Lords

Does that mean that the noble Lord will not move Amendments Nos. 24 and 25?

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c421
House
House of Lords

In that case, I will support the noble Baroness on this.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c422
House
House of Lords

Is it in order for me to speak at the same time on whether Clauses 3 and 4 should stand part of the Bill? They are all grouped together and the arguments interrelate.

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c417
House
House of Lords

I see the point of Clause 5, but if somebody buys a can of beer at an alcoholic strength of 3 per cent, it is half as dangerous as a can of a rival beer which has 6 per cent alcohol. It seems rather draconian to say that this should...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c419
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 22: 22: Clause 8, page 3, line 29, leave out paragraphs (a) to (c) and insert ““a local authority”” The noble Baroness said: The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that we do not leave any enforcement loopholes. The best way of doing that is to...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c419
House
House of Lords

I am always in favour of simplifying things and getting rid of bureaucracy. On the size of the print, however, I have studied quite a few wine bottles, and I have noted that when the warning is about 1 millimetre high, it is very difficult to read. As the noble...

Member
Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418
House
House of Lords

Thank you. It would be sensible to lose Clauses 2, 3 and 4, and it would not damage or reduce the overall impact of the Bill to do so. As they stand, the clauses are over-restrictive, inflexible and not helpful. Clause 2 is superfluous given that the food labelling regulations,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c417-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 14 to 20: 14: Clause 3, page 2, line 10, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 15: Clause 3, page 2, line 11, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 16: Clause 3, page 2, line 12, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 17: Clause 3, page 2,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418-9
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord, Lord McColl, has understood that it will be up to the Government of the day to decide on the size of the lettering and the colouring. It is not in the Bill, but it has been turned into an enabling Bill. I think that...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c418
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 1, page 1, line 3, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” The noble Baroness said: Amendment No. 3 and those identical to it deal with replacing the word ““warning”” with the word ““advice””. Again, the parallel with smoking is an issue. For tobacco products,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c413-4
House
House of Lords

It is hard to add anything to the excellent argument made by my noble friend Lady Coussins. Before we leave Clause 1, I want just to refer to something that I do not think has been mentioned, although I was not able to be here for the Second Reading debate—it...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c414
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 10 to 13: 10: Clause 2, page 1, line 14, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 11: Clause 2, page 1, line 20, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 12: Clause 2, page 2, line 2, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” 13: Clause 2, page 2,...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c416-7
House
House of Lords

I accept what the noble Baroness, Lady Coussins, says on this. The way the wind is blowing is clear from what my noble friend the Minister said. We already have a memorandum of understanding. If that is not complied with, it is clear that the Government will come down like...

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c416
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 9: 9: Clause 1, page 1, line 12, at end insert— ““(4) No advice as required by subsections (1) and (2) shall be required on any container if the producer of that container is in compliance with the voluntary labelling agreement between the alcoholic drinks industry and...

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c415-6
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 7 and 8: 7: Clause 1, page 1, line 9, leave out ““warning”” 8: Clause 1, page 1, line 10, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” On Question, amendments agreed to.

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c415
House
House of Lords

I am not quite sure how to answer the point, but I think that there is an inconsistency and I accept the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Monson. On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c415
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 6: 6: Clause 1, page 1, line 8, leave out from ““carries”” to ““a”” in line 9 The noble Lord said: I have already spoken to this amendment, but the noble Lord, Lord Mitchell, chose not to respond to it when replying to Amendment No. 2. However,...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c415
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 4 and 5: 4: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out ““GOVERNMENT WARNING:”” 5: Clause 1, page 1, line 6, leave out ““warning”” and insert ““advice”” On Question, amendments agreed to.

Member
Baroness Coussins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c415
House
House of Lords

I shall deal first with the questions raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Coussins. I agree that ““advice”” is a better word than ““warning””. Having thought about it and discussed it, I think that we are giving advice rather than issuing warnings. I feel quite comfortable with the changes and...

Member
Lord Mitchell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c414-5
House
House of Lords