Skip to main content

1-20 of 52 results for subject:Patients

Year X
2007
Subject X
Licensing

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Licensing (52)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Health Committee
Date
17 December 2007
Reference
HC 27 2007-08
House
House of Commons

My Lords, that begs the question of who decides whether there is going to be any difference, and I would have thought that it was for patients’ groups to be afforded that opportunity. But I note what the Minister said. I shall leave it there and reflect carefully on this...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c612
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 218 and 219: 218: Clause 236, page 169, line 6, leave out ““consultation”” and insert ““involvement”” 219: Clause 236, page 169, line 8, leave out ““consultation”” and insert ““involvement”” On Question, amendments agreed to.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c612
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 219ZA: 219ZA: Clause 236, page 169, line 14, at end insert— ““( ) After that section insert— ““242A Strategic Health Authorities: further duty to involve users (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations require each Strategic Health Authority to make arrangements which secure that health service...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c612-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have one addition to what the noble Earl has said. He and I are as one in thinking that the intention must be as he stated. On the issue of national representation, the Minister will know about National Voices and that we will have a national user...

Member
Baroness Neuberger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c610-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope I can offer some reassurance. I do not accept the noble Earl’s analysis of the question of consultation around a provider. The whole policy remit of the Bill is about providing for consultation around the provision of services. New duties are introduced, for example, for strategic...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c611
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was a helpful and largely reassuring reply. I accept that the insertion in the Bill of provisions relating to strategic health authorities makes a difference in so far as wholesale changes to services are concerned, because they would necessarily have to be dealt with at that level....

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c611-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point that I am trying to make is that if the patient notices any difference or is concerned that there might be a difference, the consultation duty kicks in. If there is no difference, surely there is no matter.

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c612
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness correctly anticipated the points that I would have made in speaking to Amendment No. 219ZBA. Those were precisely the concerns that she outlined. I am reassured by her reply and there is no need for me to speak to the amendment further. On Question, amendment...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c615
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 219ZB: 219ZB: Clause 237, page 169, line 15, at end insert— ““( ) In Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (c. 41) (Strategic Health Authorities), after section 17 insert— ““17A Reports on consultation (1) Each Strategic Health Authority must, at such...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c613-5
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 219A: 219A: After Clause 238, insert the following new Clause— ““Amendments to Licensing Act 2003 (1) The Licensing Act 2003 is as follows. (2) In section 9(1) (proceedings of licensing committee) for ““committee”” in the final place it appears, substitute ““authority””. (3) After section 13(3)(d) (authorised persons,...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c615-6
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 219ZC: 219ZC: Clause 237, page 169, line 21, leave out from ““consultation”” to ““commissioning”” in line 22 and insert ““carried out, or proposed to be carried out, before the making by the Primary Care Trust of”” On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c615
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 217A: 217A: Clause 236, page 168, line 40, leave out ““received by users”” and insert ““supplied by providers”” The noble Earl said: My Lords, new Section (1E), on page 168, states: "““The reference in each of subsections (1C)(a) and (1D)(a) to the delivery of services is to...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c610
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to those who have taken part in this short debate—the noble Baroness, Lady Fookes, and my noble friend Lord Imbert. I am also grateful to the Minister for what she said. She has indeed been encouraging and sympathetic, even more so in recent days...

Member
Lord Boston of Faversham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c631
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham; it has been a delightful short debate. The Cinque Ports could not have a more distinguished or powerful group of champions and advocates. I am impressed by the personal associations, especially that of the noble Lord, Lord Imbert, who gave...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c630-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we debated the proposal in Committee. I do not have a huge amount to add to what I said then, but we have certainly moved on a little way, not least because of our conversations with the LGA. Amendment No. 222 would abolish the Secretary of State’s power...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c632-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 222: 222: After Clause 242, insert the following new Clause— ““Abolition of statutory codes of recommended practice as regards publicity (1) The Local Government Act 1986 (c. 10) is amended as follows. (2) Omit section 4 (codes of recommended practice as regards publicity.)”” The noble Lord said:...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c631-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. If the local authorities had been asked whether, in place of a statutory code laid down by central government, a code prepared by local government, put forward perhaps with the Local Government Association at the helm, might exist, they would have...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c633
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Bruce-Lockhart is not in his place today to move Amendments Nos. 222A to 222C; he is not very well. I shall table them again at Third Reading in the hope that he might be able to be here then. [Amendments Nos. 222A to 222C...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c633-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 224: 224: Schedule 1, page 178, line 29, after ““words”” insert ““““and the order of retirement”” and”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Schedule 3 [Supplementary vote system: consequential amendments]: [Amendment No. 225 not moved.] Schedule 4 [Executives: further amendments]:

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2007
Reference
695 c634
House
House of Lords