Skip to main content

1-20 of 197 results for subject:Patients

Year X
2006
Subject X
NHS Litigation Authority

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
NHS Litigation Authority (197)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House believes that, where untoward incidents have taken place in NHS hospital settings, patients rightly wish to find out what happened, why things went wrong, and how similar mistakes can be avoided in the future; notes that the NHS Redress Bill would establish a mechanism for an investigation...

Primary sponsor
John Baron (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
2502
House
House of Commons

NHS Redress Bill (HL) . Committee stage third sitting. Clauses 7 to 11 agreed to, some with amendments. Clause 12 disagreed to. Clauses 13 to 19 agreed to, one with an amendment. Bill as amended to be reported.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
SCB
House
House of Commons

NHS Redress Bill (HL). Committee stage. Second sitting (afternoon). Clause 6 as amended agreed to.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
SCB
House
House of Commons

NHS Redress Bill (HL). Committee stage.First Sitting (morning). Programme motion agreed to. Clauses 1-5 agreed to.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
SCB
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is correct in saying that there is not a closed mind here, but we shall review the position in due course. The important thing is to get a scheme that works for hospital care and then to see whether the will or consensus is there in...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c77-80
House
House of Commons

I want to explore that with the hon. Gentleman in Committee, but if we want a change of culture in the NHS and if we really want it to respond differently when confronted with a poor patient experience, it must be right that the NHS can make its own response...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c80
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Crawley (Laura Moffatt), who was very clinical in her analysis of the problems facing the NHS. It is impossible to set a price on loss. Losing a mother or father, or—God forbid—a son or a daughter, is an absolute...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c61-2
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that the real issue is perception? If people perceive that the system is too much in the hands of those whom they see as judge and jury, although we and the Minister may know that they are entirely independent, that will defeat the whole object....

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c51
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that if independence is instilled in the fact-finding part of this process, people will be less likely to seek financial compensation when what they most seek is an apology and a proper finding of the facts, and that that will save the NHS money, as...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c44
House
House of Commons

In making proposals for the redress scheme, what comparisons did the Secretary of State make with other international schemes, and where does she see this scheme in the new international league table? Could we do rather better than she is suggesting?

Member
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c29
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State has twice referred to some free legal advice being available. Will she confirm that it is extremely limited in scope? It comes at the end of the procedure, not at the start when it would be most useful. There will not be enough time for a...

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c33
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is quite right. I am sure that he, like me, has had constituents coming to him to talk about a relative—a husband or wife perhaps—who had died in hospital, and about the fact that they knew that things had gone wrong. Such events may or may not...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c36-7
House
House of Commons

It is obvious that we all make mistakes in our working lives and at home. Admitting that fact is incredibly important for us. As for the NHS, it is not surprising that with more than £70 billion of taxpayers’ money being spent on that organisation, mistakes happen and people are...

Member
Laura Moffatt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c58-9
House
House of Commons

I shall deal with that point in a few moments, when I talk about the amendments that have been made to the Bill in another place. There will be important independent elements in the scheme, however, including the right to free independent legal advice before any settlement is accepted. The...

Member
Patricia Hewitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c28
House
House of Commons

Does the Secretary of State accept that it is important to patients that there should be an element of independence in the process? If they see that the redress scheme is being run by the NHS Litigation Authority, they might be less convinced that they are getting genuinely independent scrutiny...

Member
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c27-8
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely important point. However, our intention is precisely the opposite. It is to encourage a much more open culture in which doctors and other clinicians feel that they can own up to and learn from their mistakes—as is already best practice—rather than finding themselves in...

Member
Patricia Hewitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c27
House
House of Commons

Hospitals and other medical institutions will be encouraged to be proactive in this respect, but will there be quotas or targets for those institutions that could count against them if more actions resulted in payments being made? If that is to be the case, hospitals’ chief executives might not encourage...

Member
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c27
House
House of Commons

As I said a moment ago, the majority of clinical negligence cases that are settled involve compensation of less of £20,000. In the past couple of years, in slightly more than half of the cases settled for between £10,000 and £20,000, the legal costs exceeded the damages. For cases settled...

Member
Patricia Hewitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c26-7
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that the Secretary of State makes about the upper limit, but can she tell us what proportion of cases fall within the £20,000 limit?

Member
Nick Hurd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c26
House
House of Commons

I entirely accept the hon. Gentleman’s good faith and his support for at least the principle of the Bill. It will not be possible to publish draft orders before the completion of its passage, for the simple reason that there needs to be an extended period of formal and informal...

Member
Patricia Hewitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2006
Reference
447 c26
House
House of Commons