Skip to main content

1-20 of 72 results for subject:Schools

Year X
2005
Subject X
Qualifications

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
DEP 05/1654
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, how much the Young Apprenticeship Scheme (a) cost in 2004-05 and (b) is expected to cost in (i) 2005-06 and (ii) 2007-08; how many people dropped out of the scheme in 2004-05; whether schools will be able to use grades...

Asked by
Stephen O'Brien (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2005
Reference
440 c492W;440 c492W; 31262
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Education and Skills Committee
Date
28 November 2005
Reference
HC 725 2005-06
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps she is taking to ensure that special educational needs co-ordinators have appropriate training for the role they undertake.

Asked by
Helen Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 November 2005
Reference
439 c2097W;439 c2096-7W; 29702
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what research she has commissioned on academic achievements of deaf and hard of hearing pupils in (a) mainstream schools and (b) special schools and units in Hertfordshire.

Asked by
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 November 2005
Reference
26241; 439 c1282-3W;439 c1284-5W
House
House of Commons

: I agree with the hon. Gentleman that the advantages that were given to some schools in the early 1990s worked to the detriment of many inner-city schools and areas of deprivation. I shall come to the very point that he raises in a minute or two, if he will...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c198-200WH
House
House of Commons

Many, many state school pupils go on to have successful university careers and many students who start off by doing dual science end up doing separate science at A-level. The hon. Lady's blanket criticism is unnecessary.

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c201WH
House
House of Commons

: Unfortunately, the figures do not back up the hon. Lady's statement. The overwhelming majority of children who go on to university to study science come from the independent sector, not the state sector. To bear that out, only two of the 27 new academies offer science as a single...

Member
Nadine Dorries (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c201-2WH
House
House of Commons

On the face of it, the White Paper talks the talk. Unfortunately, it does not live up to its promises, and on close scrutiny it does not take long to find some of its flaws. It talks about trust schools being created with new freedoms and powers; however, that provision...

Member
Nadine Dorries (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c200-1WH
House
House of Commons

: My hon. Friend indicated that it is clear that some LEAs are better than others. Does he agree that an underlying problem with the White Paper is the stigmatisation of all LEAs as failing to provide incentives for parental involvement, innovation, success and so on, which many of us...

Member
David Lepper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197-8WH
House
House of Commons

: I did not think that what I said was that controversial.

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197WH
House
House of Commons

: I do not think that the White Paper stigmatises all LEAs. There are examples of good practice in LEAs. Some are delivering many of the items contained in the White Paper. Such models encourage us to believe that some aspects of the White Paper can be achieved, as they...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c198WH
House
House of Commons

: Clearly, if we take the most extreme example of one child with a particular specialism, there is no way that the state can cope with providing the perfect education for that child. There will clearly be a compromise, but it is a matter of what is in the best...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c196-7WH
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that the White Paper would stop parents, acting together, making a new school into a community school? Does the removal of the community school choice extend or narrow parental choice?

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197WH
House
House of Commons

: That is an intriguing question, in that it relates to one controversial aspect of the White Paper. If a new school is to be set up, the White Paper envisages it as being of an independent trust nature; it cannot be a community school. It will be a foundation...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197WH
House
House of Commons

: Does my hon. Friend think that the White Paper is right in marginalising the influence of county hall but strengthening the influence of Whitehall on education?

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197WH
House
House of Commons

: I am not certain that that is what the White Paper does. I know from discussions with my hon. Friend that he views his LEA highly, but my experience with my LEA is not the same. We come at this from slightly different directions. I said earlier that no...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c197WH
House
House of Commons

: The hon. Gentleman has answered my question, ““How much choice?”” by saying that choice will always be limited by capacity; but the state can decide that capacity, so it has to make a prior decision as to how much choice it will offer. He has not really addressed that...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c196WH
House
House of Commons

: The hon. Gentleman poses an interesting question. Choice should be made available to parents. Clearly, it will be limited by the capacity of a school to deliver the options that parents want for their child. The system may not have the capacity to deliver a choice for a child...

Member
Michael John Foster (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c196WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has indicated that a lot of people exercise choice in a variety of ways and that some people will go to great lengths to exercise their choices. Is he suggesting that the state should facilitate every conceivable choice—for example, the provision of grammar schools if people want...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2005
Reference
439 c196WH
House
House of Commons