1-20 of 71 results for subject:Surveillance
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.208 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Surveillance
- We searched for
- subject_t:Surveillance OR subject_t:"Interception of mail" OR subject_t:"Investigatory powers" OR subject_ses:93176
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he expects to publish the leaflet, The Police Act 1997: Complaints About the Use of Intrusive Surveillance.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he expects to publish the leaflet, The Police Act 1997: Complaints About the Use of Intrusive Surveillance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, on what occasions since 1987 GCHQ has been involved in the surveillance of party political conferences.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, on what occasions since 1987 GCHQ has been involved in the surveillance of party political conferences.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what safeguards are in place to ensure that MI5 does not operate outside its legal remit.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what safeguards are in place to ensure that MI5 does not operate outside its legal remit.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, under what circumstances visa applications from United Kingdom citizens seeking to visit countries overseas are monitored by MI6; and what proportion of visa applications are thus monitored.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, under what circumstances visa applications from United Kingdom citizens seeking to visit countries overseas are monitored by MI6; and what proportion of visa applications are thus monitored.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to ensure cordless telephones can only be subject to legal interception by means of a warrant. - Ref to 301 c441W.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to ensure cordless telephones can only be subject to legal interception by means of a warrant. - Ref to 301 c441W.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will extend the scope of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 to cover automatic call tracing. - Ref to 301 c441W.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will extend the scope of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 to cover automatic call tracing. - Ref to 301 c441W.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if GCHQ is permitted to undertake (a) telephone tapping and (b) other interceptions of communications where the terminal points of the communication are both in Great Britain.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if GCHQ is permitted to undertake (a) telephone tapping and (b) other interceptions of communications where the terminal points of the communication are both in Great Britain.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade, if she will estimate the annual turnover of British companies derived from the manufacture and supply of covert surveillance and listening equipment. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the President of the Board of Trade, if she will estimate the annual turnover of British companies derived from the manufacture and supply of covert surveillance and listening equipment. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Answer of 3rd November, Official Report, column 25, on how many occasions in 1996 a civil servant issued a warrant under section 4(1)(b) and section 6(1)(b) of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 and section 6(1)(b) of...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Answer of 3rd November, Official Report, column 25, on how many occasions in 1996 a civil servant issued a warrant under section 4(1)(b) and section 6(1)(b) of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 and section 6(1)(b) of...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which recommendations of the Birkett Report are not presently effective. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which recommendations of the Birkett Report are not presently effective. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will amend the terms of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 to comply with (a) Article 13 and (b) Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will amend the terms of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 to comply with (a) Article 13 and (b) Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. - (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many items of mail were legally intercepted and opened for each year since 1986; and in respect of how many persons. - INcludeds table. (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many items of mail were legally intercepted and opened for each year since 1986; and in respect of how many persons. - INcludeds table. (Holding answer 17 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list the locations of British Army surveillance towers in Northern Ireland in September 1994 and September 1997; how many of these are on civilian property; what plans exist to withdraw some of these from use in the next six...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list the locations of British Army surveillance towers in Northern Ireland in September 1994 and September 1997; how many of these are on civilian property; what plans exist to withdraw some of these from use in the next six...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to alter the Draft Code of Practice on Intrusive Surveillance to (a) ensure equal rights for tenants as for property owners and (b) include a definition of urgency.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans he has to alter the Draft Code of Practice on Intrusive Surveillance to (a) ensure equal rights for tenants as for property owners and (b) include a definition of urgency.
That this House notes the Government's publication of the Draft Code of Practice on Intrusive Surveillance following the Police Act 1997; notes further that the code of practice would allow sensitive surveillance operations by the Police to go ahead, without the prior authorisation of judicial commissioners, when they are deemed urgent; notes further that there is no definition or explanation in the code of practice of when an operation can be considered urgent; further notes that those who are tenants will not have the same rights under the code as property owners; note that there are no proposals in the code of practice under which those who have inappropriately placed under surveillance will be notified of those operations; believes that the code of practice fails to address some of the concerns expressed by the Law Lords, the press and the public when the Police Act 1997 was progressing through Parliament; and calls on the Home Secretary to revise the draft code in the light of these concerns.
That this House notes the Government's publication of the Draft Code of Practice on Intrusive Surveillance following the Police Act 1997; notes further that the code of practice would allow sensitive surveillance operations by the Police to go ahead, without the prior authorisation of judicial commissioners, when they are deemed...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, under what circumstances MI5 operatives are allowed to undertake intrusive surveillance without first obtaining a warrant. - (Holding answer 3 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, under what circumstances MI5 operatives are allowed to undertake intrusive surveillance without first obtaining a warrant. - (Holding answer 3 November 1997).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many chief officer authorisations by (a) the police, and (b) HM Customs and Excise and (c) both, of intrusive surveillance operations were made which affected Sussex for the most recent year for which figures are available. - Includes figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many chief officer authorisations by (a) the police, and (b) HM Customs and Excise and (c) both, of intrusive surveillance operations were made which affected Sussex for the most recent year for which figures are available. - Includes figures.
Statement on whether they will confirm the arrangements for the public consultation exercise on the intrusive surveillance code or practice required under part III of the Police Act 1997. - Further to 581 c114WA, we have now decided that the public consultation exercise should begin on 12 August.
Statement on whether they will confirm the arrangements for the public consultation exercise on the intrusive surveillance code or practice required under part III of the Police Act 1997. - Further to 581 c114WA, we have now decided that the public consultation exercise should begin on 12 August.