1-20 of 332 results for subject:USA
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.3 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- subject:USA
- We searched for
- subject_t:USA OR subject_t:"United States" OR subject_t:"United States of America" OR subject_t:US OR subject_ses:13557
Answering member
X
Adam Ingram
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Ingram, Adam (332)
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which sites in the UK are being considered for the possible deployment of US missiles for the US Missile Defense system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which sites in the UK are being considered for the possible deployment of US missiles for the US Missile Defense system.
Asked by
Norman Baker
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
7 March 2007
For answer on
9 March 2007
Answered on
14 March 2007
No sites in the UK are presently under consideration as possible locations for a ground based interceptor site.
Subjects
USA; Ballistic missile defence
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c332-3W; 126934
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what representations have been made by the US Administration to (a) officials and (b) Ministers in his Department concerning allegations of bribery by BAE Systems in the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what representations have been made by the US Administration to (a) officials and (b) Ministers in his Department concerning allegations of bribery by BAE Systems in the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Vincent Cable
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 January 2007
For answer on
11 January 2007
Answered on
29 January 2007
We have identified a record of one such representation, made on 19 July 2002 to the then Permanent Under-Secretary.
Subjects
Corruption; USA; Saudi Arabia; Project Al Yamamah; BAE Systems
Date
29 January 2007
Reference
115158; 456 c22W;456 c20W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the Active Denial System under development by the US military.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the Active Denial System under development by the US military.
Asked by
Patrick Mercer
(Conservative)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
4 December 2006
For answer on
6 December 2006
Answered on
8 January 2007
No technical assessment of the US Active Denial System for UK use has been made by this Department.
Subjects
Weapons; USA; Civil disorder
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
105096; 455 c75W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the value of UK (a) exports and (b) imports of (i) defence material and (ii) defence services to the US was in the last year for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the value of UK (a) exports and (b) imports of (i) defence material and (ii) defence services to the US was in the last year for which figures are available.
Asked by
Mike Hancock
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 October 2006
For answer on
11 October 2006
Answered on
2 November 2006
The values of the physical exports of defence equipment from the UK to the USA are reported in the Annual Reports on the United Kingdom Strategic Export Controls. The figures are derived by HM Revenue and Customs according to an agreed set of tariff codes for Defence equipment. HM Revenue and Customs also produce figures for equipment imports to the UK from the USA. The figures for 2005 are provided in the following table:
We only have very limited and partial figures for imports and exports of defence services between the UK and USA produced as part of the Ministry of Defence Estimated Balance of Payments for Trade in Services. For 2005 these data show the value of services recorded under MOD Estimated Balance of Payments for imported services from USA was £456 million and the exported services was £252 million.
| 2005 | |
| £ million | |
| Exports | 309 |
| Imports | 309 |
Subjects
Arms trade; USA
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
93344; 451 c643W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what dates since 1 January 2005 US Navy nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed submarines have visited UK waters or designated berths; and what the location was in each case.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what dates since 1 January 2005 US Navy nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed submarines have visited UK waters or designated berths; and what the location was in each case.
Asked by
Norman Baker
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
6 June 2006
For answer on
8 June 2006
Answered on
13 June 2006
US Navy nuclear-powered submarines have visited the following UK designated berths since 1 January 2005:Plymouth"4-9 May 2005""19-22 October 2005""9-15 November 2005"Faslane"6-16 May 2005""10-17 June 2005""22-29 June 2005""5-12 August 2005""17-19 August 2005""25-29 August 2005""8-11 May 2006"A further visit to Faslane will take place 9-15 June 2006.During the period there have been no visits to Portsmouth, the Solent anchorages, or to other UK designated berths.All these visits were by nuclear powered submarines (SSN). There were no visits by nuclear ballistic missile armed submarines (SSBN).
Subjects
USA; Nuclear submarines
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c1085W; 76289
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of the United States army's presence in the United Kingdom is stationed at RAF Hythe.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of the United States army's presence in the United Kingdom is stationed at RAF Hythe.
Asked by
Julian Lewis
(Conservative)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 May 2006
For answer on
11 May 2006
Answered on
11 May 2006
There are two United States army personnel stationed at RAF Hythe and this represents less than 1 per cent. of the total number of United States army personnel in the United Kingdom. In addition to the two US army personnel at RAF Hythe the US army also employs around 200 civilians at the facility.
Subjects
USA; RAF Hythe
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
68540; 446 c482W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make representations to his United States counterparts to maintain the US Army Field Support Battalion at RAF Hythe (a) until existing work at the shipyard has been completed and (b) permanently.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make representations to his United States counterparts to maintain the US Army Field Support Battalion at RAF Hythe (a) until existing work at the shipyard has been completed and (b) permanently.
Asked by
Julian Lewis
(Conservative)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 May 2006
For answer on
11 May 2006
Answered on
11 May 2006
It was a US Government decision to withdraw the US army operations from RAF Hythe by 30 September 2006. Representations were made to the US ambassador in advance of the decision being made.
Subjects
USA; RAF Hythe
Date
11 May 2006
Reference
68539; 446 c481W
House
House of Commons
Adjournment debate on the proposed closure of RAF Hythe.
Adjournment debate on the proposed closure of RAF Hythe.
Lead member
Julian Lewis
Answering member
Adam Ingram
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Audit; Closures; Air force; Military bases; Military alliances; Repairs and maintenance; Shipbuilding; USA; RAF Hythe
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
446 c287-94
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether an (a) memorandum of understanding and (b) exchange of letters between the United States and the United Kingdom on the joint strike fighter programme includes a provision guaranteeing the transfer of technology.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether an (a) memorandum of understanding and (b) exchange of letters between the United States and the United Kingdom on the joint strike fighter programme includes a provision guaranteeing the transfer of technology.
Asked by
Nick Harvey
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
20 April 2006
For answer on
24 April 2006
Answered on
8 May 2006
The Memorandum of Understanding for the current phase of the programme contains provisions for the exchange of information to enable the participants to meet their respective requirements. In addition the Exchange of Letters (EoLs) signed in 2001 articulates the areas of military and industrial capability that are necessary to satisfy UK sovereign requirements. The EoLs do not contain a provision on guaranteeing transfer of technology. The UK remains committed to working closely with the US administration to resolve the issue of technology sharing and we are optimistic that our ongoing discussions will be successful.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
8 May 2006
Reference
65958; 446 c31-2W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Human Rights Act 1988 applies at UK bases used by United States forces, including bases in UK Overseas Territories.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Human Rights Act 1988 applies at UK bases used by United States forces, including bases in UK Overseas Territories.
Asked by
Michael Moore
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 March 2006
For answer on
28 March 2006
Answered on
18 April 2006
The Human Rights Act 1998 does apply at bases made available to the United States Visiting Force (USVF) in the UK. However, whether the Act applies in any specific case will depend on whether the acts of a public authority are being challenged. The USVF is not a public authority under the Act.The Human Rights Act does not apply to UK overseas territories. The European Convention on Human Rights applies to UK overseas territories if Her Majesty's Government notifies the Secretary General of the European Council. Remedies for any breach of the Convention would be provided under local law or before the European Court of Human Rights.
Subjects
Military bases; USA
Date
18 April 2006
Reference
62243; 445 c8W;445 c8W
House
House of Commons
We continue to make good progress with the US to ensure that the UK's military and industrial requirements for the joint strike fighter programme will be met. In the last 10 days, there have been no fewer than three meetings on those very issues with the Senate Committee on Armed Services, involving the Secretary of State and my noble Friend Lord Drayson, the Minister for Defence Procurement. One took place in Washington and two in London. Following those discussions, we remain optimistic that we will be in a position to sign a production, sustainment and follow-on development memorandum of understanding in December, as planned.
We continue to make good progress with the US to ensure that the UK's military and industrial requirements for the joint strike fighter programme will be met. In the last 10 days, there have been no fewer than three meetings on those very issues with the Senate Committee on Armed Services, involving the Secretary of State and my noble Friend Lord Drayson, the Minister for Defence Procurement. One took place in Washington and two in London. Following those discussions, we remain optimistic that we will be in a position to sign a production, sustainment and follow-on development memorandum of understanding in December, as planned.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Peter Bone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
What progress has been made in discussions with the United States about the joint strike fighter. [60957]
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c523
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Yes, I do, and it will be on programme.
Yes, I do, and it will be on programme.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Peter Bone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Does the Minister really believe that the joint strike fighter will ever enter service? If so, when will it do so, and by how much will it be over budget?
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c523
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
That was an important part of our earlier approach, and we still believe that it would confer added enhancement and benefits to the programme. We will continue to make that view known. It was raised when my noble Friend Lord Drayson met the US Senate Committee on Armed Services about 10 days ago, and we continue to raise it, along with all the other representations that we make about the need for transfer of the technology.
That was an important part of our earlier approach, and we still believe that it would confer added enhancement and benefits to the programme. We will continue to make that view known. It was raised when my noble Friend Lord Drayson met the US Senate Committee on Armed Services about 10 days ago, and we continue to raise it, along with all the other representations that we make about the need for transfer of the technology.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Sarah McCarthy-Fry
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Does the Minister agree that the decision by the United States to cancel the development and construction of the second engine, apart from delivering a blow to British jobs, was a shortsighted decision? In creating competition by developing two engines, we could have driven down costs in the whole project, and secured a better engine design.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c524
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I know that the right hon. Gentleman has taken a close interest in the matter, and that senior members of his party were present during the representations made in Washington. All the representations are being made as strenuously, as pointedly and, I believe, as constructively as we can make them. Every effort will be made to ensure that that continues, and I know that the right hon. Gentleman will take the opportunity to express his view to those in Washington with whom he is in contact.
I know that the right hon. Gentleman has taken a close interest in the matter, and that senior members of his party were present during the representations made in Washington. All the representations are being made as strenuously, as pointedly and, I believe, as constructively as we can make them. Every effort will be made to ensure that that continues, and I know that the right hon. Gentleman will take the opportunity to express his view to those in Washington with whom he is in contact.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Michael Jack
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
On the basis of a briefing that I received from our embassy in Washington, may I record my appreciation for what Lord Drayson has done by way of representation on Capitol hill?
While the Minister pursues his objective of ensuring that the memorandum of understanding is signed in November, what steps are being taken to bring the armed forces committee and the House of Representatives on side? They appear still to be the ultimate logjam.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c524
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What progress has been made in discussions with the United States about the joint strike fighter. [60957]
What progress has been made in discussions with the United States about the joint strike fighter. [60957]
Asked by
Peter Bone
(Conservative)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
21 March 2006
For answer on
27 March 2006
Answered on
27 March 2006
We continue to make good progress with the US to ensure that the UK's military and industrial requirements for the joint strike fighter programme will be met. In the last 10 days, there have been no fewer than three meetings on those very issues with the Senate Committee on Armed Services, involving the Secretary of State and my noble Friend Lord Drayson, the Minister for Defence Procurement. One took place in Washington and two in London. Following those discussions, we remain optimistic that we will be in a position to sign a production, sustainment and follow-on development memorandum of understanding in December, as planned.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c523; 60957
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I would love to be able to enlighten my hon. Friend, but no final decisions have yet been made on the points that he has raised.
I would love to be able to enlighten my hon. Friend, but no final decisions have yet been made on the points that he has raised.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Lindsay Hoyle
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Of course my right hon. Friend is aware of the need to ensure that the contract goes ahead, but as part of that contract we need to see final assembly for the north-west and full heavy maintenance in the United Kingdom. Those are the reassurances that we need, as well as the hope of a short take-off and vertical landing version of the joint strike fighter. Can my right hon. Friend enlighten the House on what progress has been made?
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c523-4
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I thank the hon. Gentleman for his efforts, particularly during his visit to Washington, in trying to ensure that we do what is required to take this programme forward. We have made it clear that we want to win the contract on the proposed basis and we are making every effort to achieve that. The US Administration—and, indeed, beyond that—well understand the strength of our case, but it does not help to point out that other nations are allegedly involved in things that they should not be doing, as such a claim has been the basis of press reports. Clearly, there are some concerns within the US about this matter. As I said in my earlier answer to the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey), the issue will be settled on the basis of the good relationship that exists between very close allies and partners. If we struck the deal that we want, I am sure that every aspect would be honoured on both sides of the relationship.
I thank the hon. Gentleman for his efforts, particularly during his visit to Washington, in trying to ensure that we do what is required to take this programme forward. We have made it clear that we want to win the contract on the proposed basis and we are making every effort to achieve that. The US Administration—and, indeed, beyond that—well understand the strength of our case, but it does not help to point out that other nations are allegedly involved in things that they should not be doing, as such a claim has been the basis of press reports. Clearly, there are some concerns within the US about this matter. As I said in my earlier answer to the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey), the issue will be settled on the basis of the good relationship that exists between very close allies and partners. If we struck the deal that we want, I am sure that every aspect would be honoured on both sides of the relationship.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Liam Fox
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
I am sure that the Minister would agree that the JSF is the best aircraft for the roles that are currently envisaged, and that defence technology transfer should not be an issue, given the intelligence co-operation and nuclear weapon technology exchange between the UK and the US. Does he also agree that failure could drive the UK into further European procurement that is not, in this instance, in the strategic interests of either the UK or the United States?
Does the Minister understand the fears of the United States about the leakage of defence technology? Would he care to reflect on the damage done by today's news that 41 German companies are being investigated over sales of equipment and technology to Iran for potential use in its nuclear programme, and the impact that that will have on Capitol hill?
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c525
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
I do not have the precise figure to date, but I can say from memory that it is about $1 billion. I will write to the hon. Gentleman with a more up-to-date figure.
The other issue that has been raised is ““Government to Government””. We have very good relations with the United States Administration, although obviously we have differences with them as well, and express ourselves forcefully when those differences arise. When agreements are reached, they are reached by two mutual and close partners. I do not see the worries that the hon. Gentleman is trying to raise. I know that there is a bit of anti-Americanism in certain parts of politics today; I think that that is to be regretted, and that it detracts from what we are seeking to do.
I do not have the precise figure to date, but I can say from memory that it is about $1 billion. I will write to the hon. Gentleman with a more up-to-date figure.
The other issue that has been raised is ““Government to Government””. We have very good relations with the United States Administration, although obviously we have differences with them as well, and express ourselves forcefully when those differences arise. When agreements are reached, they are reached by two mutual and close partners. I do not see the worries that the hon. Gentleman is trying to raise. I know that there is a bit of anti-Americanism in certain parts of politics today; I think that that is to be regretted, and that it detracts from what we are seeking to do.
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Asked by
Nick Harvey
(Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
I commend the robust attitude that Ministers are taking on the issue of technology transfer, but may I ask how much money has been spent on the programme so far, and what conditions were established at the outset in relation to technology transfer? Clearly we are talking about huge sums, and I presume that the Government must have included some guarantees in the original agreement that they negotiated.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c524-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the equipment valued over £20,000 that is being borrowed from US forces by UK armed forces.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the equipment valued over £20,000 that is being borrowed from US forces by UK armed forces.
Asked by
Gerald Howarth
(Conservative)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
16 February 2006
For answer on
27 February 2006
Answered on
21 March 2006
Details of equipment, currently in use by UK armed forces, that has been borrowed from US forces are not held centrally.A comprehensive listing of all equipment valued over £20,000 could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Subjects
Defence equipment; Leasing; USA; Military aid
Date
21 March 2006
Reference
54387; 444 c362W;444 c362W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many meetings (a) he, (b) his Ministers and (c) staff from his Department have had with (i) US defence officials and (ii) members of Congress to discuss the Joint Strike Fighter programme; and what the purpose of these meetings was in...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many meetings (a) he, (b) his Ministers and (c) staff from his Department have had with (i) US defence officials and (ii) members of Congress to discuss the Joint Strike Fighter programme; and what the purpose of these meetings was in...
Asked by
David S Borrow
(Labour)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
8 March 2006
For answer on
10 March 2006
Answered on
16 March 2006
I refer my hon. Friend to the statement made in my answer of 3 March to the hon. Member for Gravesham (Mr. Holloway), Official Report, column 1000W, and to my answer of 23 January to the right hon. Member for Fylde (Mr. Jack), Official Report, column 1714W. Regular discussions take place at all levels with the US Administration on all aspects of the Joint Strike Fighter programme. Ministry of Defence and other Ministers continue to raise project issues during their discussions with key members of the US Administration, including testimony by my noble Friend the Minister for Defence Procurement (Lord Drayson) and the Chief of the Air Staff to the Senate Armed Services Committee on 14 March.
Subjects
USA; F-35 aircraft
Date
16 March 2006
Reference
57833; 443 c2436W;443 c2436W
House
House of Commons