Skip to main content

1-20 of 62 results for subject:Women

Answering member X
Lord Harrington of Watford

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Harrington of Watford, Lord (62)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to take note of Her Majesty's Government's plans to support refugees from Ukraine. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Helic
Answering member
Lord Harrington of Watford
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates
Date
6 April 2022
Reference
820 cc295-326GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent discussions he has had with business representatives on potential barriers to recruiting women into the STEM workforce.

Asked by
Gregory Campbell (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2018
Reference
197356
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether his Department plans to mark the centenary of women getting the right to vote in 1918.

Asked by
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2018
Reference
125117
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of women born in the 1950s affected by the change in the state pension age who have access to an occupational or private pension.

Asked by
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
70331
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of women born in the 1950s affected by the change in state pension age who (a) have remained in employment, (b) are registered for and in receipt of jobseeker's allowance and (c)...

Asked by
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
70332
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will take steps to introduce a non-means-tested bridging pension to provide an income from the age of 60 years old until state pension age for women affected by the changes to state pension age legislation.

Asked by
Baroness Elliott of Whitburn Bay (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
70594
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the oral contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Pensions of 27 March 2017, Official Report, column 16, what estimate his Department has made of the cost of that alternative proposed by the Work and Pensions Committee...

Asked by
Tim Loughton (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
69604
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps the Government is taking to encourage more women to enrol in pensions at a younger age.

Asked by
Baroness Debbonaire (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
909494
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the financial effect on women of recent changes in the pension age

Asked by
Maria Caulfield (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
909488
House
House of Commons

I give the same answer I gave to the hon. Member for Ross, Skye and Lochaber (Ian Blackford): the Government have been clear that the introduction of further transitional arrangements cannot be justified, given the imperative to focus public resources

on helping those who are most in need. There are no plans to go beyond the £1.1 billion concession introduced when Parliament considered the changes.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c15
House
House of Commons

The proposal is not cost-neutral; I must make that clear. It is very impractical and it is impossible to do in the time concerned. I have made it very clear that the transitional arrangements that were made when the Pensions Bill went through Parliament are all that will be provided.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c16
House
House of Commons

These changes took place under two Acts of Parliament: the Pensions Act 1995, which brought in the main change, and the Pensions Act after that. I want to make it clear that after the 1995 Act, 18 months was the maximum increase.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c16
House
House of Commons

The Government will be making a full response to the Cridland report. The review is forward-looking and, I must make it clear, will not

make recommendations for any changes to happen before 2028. That was a commitment in the 2013 autumn statement.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c16
House
House of Commons

There is a lot happening in pensions at the moment. The point the hon. Gentleman mentions in relation to the Chancellor of the Exchequer is something completely different, but there will be no change to the transitional arrangements at £1.1 billion.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c17
House
House of Commons

As I said before, the Government will respond to the Cridland review by the end of May.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c17
House
House of Commons

Automatic enrolment was designed specifically to help those who were under-represented in pension savings, including women. With the current rate of £10,000 a year, 70% of the new people coming into the system in 2017-18 will be women.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c22
House
House of Commons

In the latter case, Steve Webb was Pensions Minister at the time, so I do not think there is much further I can say about that.

There were very extensive communications on the 1995 changes. Millions of people checked their state pension requirements; it was publicised and leaflets were produced. This has been said many times on the Floor of the House, and I simply reiterate it.

Answered by
Lord Harrington of Watford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
624 c16
House
House of Commons

What recent discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on improving pension transition arrangements for women born in the 1950s.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
909483; 624 cc15-6
House
House of Commons

What recent discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on improving pension transition arrangements for women born in the 1950s.

Asked by
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2017
Reference
909493; 624 cc15-6
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when his Department became aware of the number of women born in the 1950s who would be affected by the acceleration in state pension age.

Asked by
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2017
Reference
68275
House
House of Commons