1-3 of 3 results for subject:Defence
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.155 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Defence
- We searched for
- subject_t:Defence OR subject_t:"National defence" OR subject_ses:90842
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Eleventh opposition day debate (part one), on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP). Main question negatived on division (64 to 330).
Eleventh opposition day debate (part one), on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP). Main question negatived on division (64 to 330).
Thirteenth opposition day debate, on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP), Plaid Cymru and the Green party. Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Main question negatived on division (37 to 364 - Corrected on 21 January from 35 to 364).
Thirteenth opposition day debate, on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP), Plaid Cymru and the Green party. Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Main question negatived on division (37 to 364 - Corrected on 21 January from 35 to 364).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much of the funding allocated in the Defence and Equipment Plan 2013 for the procurement of new equipment will be spent on the successor nuclear deterrent programme and any redesign of the nuclear warhead.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much of the funding allocated in the Defence and Equipment Plan 2013 for the procurement of new equipment will be spent on the successor nuclear deterrent programme and any redesign of the nuclear warhead.
Of the £64.5 billion referred to in the 2013 Equipment Plan we plan to allocate to the procurement of new equipment, £2.3 billion is for the successor nuclear deterrent programme in the period up to Main Gate in 2016, when a future investment decision will be made. The 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review determined that a replacement warhead would not be required until at least the late 2030s, meaning a decision to replace the existing warhead will not be required until the next Parliament. In the meantime, we are maintaining the capability at the Atomic Weapons Establishment to design a replacement warhead should that be required. Current forecasts indicate that costs should remain within the 2006 White Paper estimate: £11 billion-£14 billion for the submarine and £2 billion-£3 billion for the warhead (at 2006 economic conditions).