Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for subject:"Wind power"

Answering member X
Ed Davey

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Davey, Ed (50)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am glad that this is one issue on which the hon. Lady and I can agree. I recently went to Hull to see the latest development in the Siemens plan. The plan is very exciting and is crucial for Hull. It has been welcomed by business, education and the council in Hull. I agree it is astonishing that, locally, UKIP and the Green party are opposing the development. It is quite bizarre.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 February 2015
Reference
592 c419
House
House of Commons

I am surprised that my hon. Friend, who has great experience in the House, should ask a Minister to comment on a live planning inquiry.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 December 2014
Reference
589 c1548
House
House of Commons

I am slightly confused by the hon. Gentleman’s question because he misquotes what the Prime Minister said on Tuesday. The fact is that onshore wind supplies just over 5% of our electricity today. By 2020, with the onshore wind farms that are in the planning stage and with the assumption that some will not get through, we expect to get to about 10%.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 December 2014
Reference
589 c1549
House
House of Commons

First, it is worth putting it on the record, as it is Christmas, that Britain leads the world in offshore wind, with more offshore wind farms installed than in

the rest of the world combined. In the current round of CfD allocations—of course, it has not been completed yet, so I cannot talk about the details—we have ensured that we have sufficient allocation for offshore wind, but we have also ensured that the levy control framework includes further allocations for it, so that the consumer can benefit from dropping prices.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 December 2014
Reference
589 c1551
House
House of Commons

The whole House can unite behind what the hon. Lady has said. First, it is very good news that Hull city council has gone for planning permission. This Government have worked with the council, with Siemens and with others to bring forward this exciting and vital investment, which is a real shot in the arm for the offshore wind supply chain that we are determined to see as a healthy sector in this country. The statements from UKIP that the hon. Lady mentioned are deplorable and, as with almost everything UKIP says, are against this country’s economic interests. I am particularly surprised to hear that the Green party would want to boycott a company of the standing of Siemens, which has done so much in this country.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 September 2014
Reference
585 c427
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many wind turbines are planned for development in each constituency in Nottinghamshire.

Asked by
Gloria De Piero (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2014
Reference
205149; 584 c746W
House
House of Commons

I have to tell my hon. Friend that we are favouring other renewables. Offshore wind and other renewables get much higher strike prices. With regard to the spend from our low-carbon electricity budget, under the levy control framework they get more support because they are less mature technologies. As the technologies mature, we have been reducing support, whether for solar or onshore wind, in particular. Onshore wind is playing a vital role. It is the cheapest large-scale renewable technology, and I would not want to do anything to reduce its deployment.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 April 2014
Reference
578 c996
House
House of Commons

The coalition’s policy is to continue to support the deployment of onshore wind. We already have 7.2 GW operational—a very big increase under this coalition—as well as 5.2 GW that have been consented and 6.5 GW in planning. We do not expect all that to come forward, but it does suggest that investors believe that Britain is a good place for onshore wind.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 April 2014
Reference
578 c996
House
House of Commons

I can tell my hon. Friend that there is no need for a lessons-learned exercise, because the offshore wind industry is in very healthy form. Of course, one or two projects will not go ahead—that may be for geological reasons, such as the one off the north Devon coast—but that is nothing to do with our regime. Some offshore wind projects will not get contracts for difference, but that is because we are going for the best value-for-money projects.

The good news is that we have more installed offshore wind capacity in this country than in any other country. According to independent analysis, we are the best place to come and invest in offshore wind. When we announce those who have won the go-early CfDs in March, I am very confident that more offshore wind will come forward.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 January 2014
Reference
573 cc993-4
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his question. We are seeing major investment in all sorts of renewables, including onshore wind and the farm to which he has referred. I very much support his call and congratulate the companies involved.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 November 2013
Reference
571 c403
House
House of Commons

We understand people’s concerns not just about onshore wind but about other forms of energy production, such as shale and so on. We need to ensure that the planning system is responsive. The hon. Gentleman knows that what he has said could be applied to many

other developments outside energy. It is often the case that the unpopular development of housing or a supermarket gets overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 November 2013
Reference
571 c404
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will know that the public inquiry has started, and that it would be inappropriate for a Minister to comment on it. I am sorry, but I cannot give him the answer he looks for.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 June 2013
Reference
563 c1656
House
House of Commons

The proposed height of wind turbines is set out in the planning applications that are submitted for proposed wind farms. The local planning portal shows four wind farms with applications submitted in north Lincolnshire, with heights that vary from up to 100 metres to 126.5 metres. We are committed to supporting onshore wind as part of a balanced mix of energy to meet the UK’s needs. Wind farms must be well designed and well sited to be approved, and the planning process can take account of concerns, including landscape and visual amenity concerns.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2013
Reference
560 c461
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman will know that I benefit from an infallible Minister of State who comes from Lincolnshire. He keeps me informed of all the issues to do with Lincolnshire and gives me his own particular line on them. I can reassure the hon. Gentleman that I am well versed in Lincolnshire issues. We take community concerns seriously, not just in Lincolnshire but across the country. That is why we published the call for evidence on community benefits in September. We will report to the House on that in the summer.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2013
Reference
560 c462
House
House of Commons

I am sorry to disappoint my hon. Friend but I cannot agree with that bold statement, not least because onshore wind is one of the cheapest—if not the cheapest—of the large-scale renewable technologies. It has huge benefits. The planning system is important, however, and local communities can have a say on these matters. One reason that we published the call for evidence on community benefits was to ensure that local communities benefit more from hosting such installations.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2013
Reference
560 c467
House
House of Commons

I did not give my hon. Friend’s neighbour a brush-off. His hon. Friend—and my hon. Friend—asked me whether I thought that we had enough onshore wind. I do not think that, but, as my hon. Friend the Member for Skipton and Ripon (Julian Smith) knows, Secretaries of State rightly do not comment on local planning applications.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 March 2013
Reference
560 c470
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what the height will be of the proposed wind farms in North Lincolnshire; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 2013
Reference
147689; 560 cc461-2
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what recent assessment he has made of the financial return of the subsidy for onshore windfarm providers.
Asked by
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
140464; 557 c1042
House
House of Commons

It is important that communities have a real opportunity to have a say over development in their area, which is why this Government’s planning reforms put local communities in the driving seat. Our recent call for evidence looked at how communities can be better engaged with, and receive greater benefit from, hosting onshore wind in their area, and there will be a report in the summer.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1039
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s question. He will understand that planning issues and support for local communities and local authorities are matters for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, and in my hon. Friend’s constituency for people in the Welsh Assembly Government, no doubt, but he makes a fair point. One reason why we have made the call for evidence on how local communities can benefit is to ensure that developers come forward and engage with local communities far better and in a less adversarial way than we have seen in some cases.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1040
House
House of Commons