Skip to main content

1-20 of 77 results for subject:Patients

Answering member X
Lord Darzi of Denham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Darzi of Denham, Lord (77)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am aware of these debates and refer to a publication from the Institute of Medicine in the US, which is the US academy. It stated that the surgery profession was concerned about the shift in work mentality, loss of professionalism and decreased access to quality surgical care; but that it was difficult to assess how much of the complaining represented rhetoric and resistance to change rather than valid criticism. I am here to share evidence with noble Lords. The evidence is quite clear from the Institute of Medicine’s publication—the error is human. In 1999, between 44,000 and 98,000 people died in hospitals from adverse effects. The single and most important contributor is sleep deprivation and fatigue. The reduction to 48 hours a week is to enhance patient safety and, let us not forget, to enhance the social well-being of doctors, who have the highest rates of divorce, addiction and depression.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c2
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for raising the issue. She is correct that we have had 10 years to get these rotas compliant. There are 200 rotas and, to be fair to the service—I am sure that the noble Baroness will agree—there are some sub-specialties for which we find it extremely difficult to make these rotas compliant: for example, transplantation in children and some neurosurgical disciplines. As a result, we have requested derogation for another few years. This is a health and safety directive, so if an organisation is not compliant, the accountable officer, who is the chief executive, will be accountable for breaking the law in relation to the 48-hour week.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am grateful for the noble Lord raising that important issue. Anaesthetists should get more rest than surgeons. Some of us may enjoy the odd nap here, but it is a dangerous thing to do in an operating theatre. The answer to the question is valid: a number of rotas have been requested for derogation in anaesthesia, but we hope that within two years we will be able to resolve some of these issues.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there have been 200 successful applications across 13 specialties, which represents about 3 per cent of all the rotas. I could write to the noble Baroness with details of which regions and what specialties. The 3 per cent is what we believe needs to be derogated by 1 August. However, if there are strains on services within a period of 26 weeks—we calculate the 48-hour week over a period of 26 weeks—the employing organisation could request further rotas to be derogated.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c2-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am told that the directive was introduced in Europe at a time when impact assessment was not a part of the introduction of European legislation. However, I share the noble Lord’s concerns about its impact on the quality of training for the future generation of surgeons, which is an important issue. To address that, we need to start a dialogue not around the numbers of hours of training, but on how we can improve the quality of the hours of training. The noble Lord is well aware that some units across the country which have a dedicated curriculum may separate elective from emergency services or use simulation, all of which are training tools. Some organisations have different training cultures in addressing the quality of training. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State recently asked Medical Education England to look at the impact of the European working time directive on the quality of training.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, any doctor employed in the National Health Service who might provide services within an NHS provider or outside in social community services will be obliged to comply with the 48-hour working time directive.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c4
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they will take to ensure that patient care will not suffer following the introduction of the new European Working Time Directive on 1 August.
Asked by
Baroness Knight of Collingtree (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c1-2
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the NHS has made excellent progress in implementing this important health and safety legislation, which ensures that patients receive safe, high-quality care from staff who have not worked excessive hours. Only doctors in training remain to become fully compliant by 1 August and two-thirds of them are already working a 48-hour week averaged over 26 weeks. Our overriding principles are patient safety and the quality of care. This is paramount to all that we do.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2009
Reference
712 c1-2
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Darzi of Denham on 30 April (WA 70), whether they are consulting patient representatives on the proposals to introduce generic substitution by pharmacists of branded medicines prescribed under the National Health Service.

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
3750; 711 c48-9WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government when the report by the Healthcare Commission on standards of patient safety in West London Mental Health Trust will be published.

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
3708; 710 c329WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government why West London Mental Health Trust was offered Foundation Trust equivalent status prior to the consideration of (a) the report of the independent investigation into failures at Broadmoor Hospital in 2004, and (b) the Healthcare Commission report on standards of patient safety in West London...

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
3709; 710 c330WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps will be taken to monitor standards of safety and patient care at Broadmoor Hospital in the light of the findings of the independent investigation of care at Broadmoor and from the report of the Healthcare Commission on standards of patient safety in West...

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2009
Reference
3710; 710 c330WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the National Cancer Action Team is working with cancer networks and cancer charities to develop an electronic delivery system that can be used by professionals to deliver information prescriptions to patients at any point during their cancer journey. Eleven tumour-specific information pathways have been developed and are being piloted across 71 sites in England. It is planned that the full system will be available and that all cancer patients will receive an information prescription as part of their consultation from 2010.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1307
House
House of Lords
My Lords, that is correct. The information prescription pilots are addressing, first, the concept of the dispensing of patient prescription information by a clinical nurse specialist who has all the competencies to explain the content of such prescription information. In addition, a written consultation discussion will be recorded and explained by the consultant; prescribing and dispensing information with a palliative care setting will be given; and there will be patient self-prescribing, with an explanation of what the content of that prescription means.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1307
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I agree. I can say that patients’ satisfaction and experience tremendously improved when I started to work for the specialist nurse in my colorectal team. I could not agree more; we need to develop specialist nurses and the roles that they will play, but that needs a significant mindset shift, certainly on the part of many of my nursing colleagues, as well as the development of competencies in providing that type of service.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1309
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the reason these are called information prescriptions rather than notes is because they contain evidence-based information. As to what this process does to the relationship between the clinician and the patients, I personally think it is transforming it from an era of paternalism into an era of partnership between the patient and the clinician.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1308
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I commend Christie’s and many specialist hospitals around the country. I work in one, the Royal Marsden, which provides services not dissimilar to the ones provided by Christie’s. I have little expertise in the banking arrangements of specialist hospitals, but I shall be more than happy to write to my noble friend about the issue.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1308
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we give guidance to PCTs about the information prescription. As it stands, we are running the pilots to learn more from them but, while we are doing so, we also have 25,000 patient questionnaires seeking patients’ views about the information. One thousand, two hundred and fifty patients will be part of the participating pilot while the other half will be the control group without the information prescription, and those are the comparative data on which we hope to build the system in 2010.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1308-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we are working with a large number of charities. I acknowledge the championing and pioneering impact of the work of the late Lady Clement-Jones, who introduced this concept through Cancerbackup and, more recently, Macmillan Cancer Support. We are working with CRUK, the biggest cancer charity in this country, supporting research and the evidence base for these information prescriptions. In addition, at least 32 other charities that deal with cancer are helping us with the content of such information prescriptions.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1308
House
House of Lords
My Lords, this is an academic evaluation so there is a random control trial going on. Patients will be selected at random. That is one of the pilots looking at the impact of this. Our aspiration is that every patient with cancer will receive an information prescription throughout the whole of their pathway, whether that is the referral from the general practitioner to the specialist centre, the diagnosis, the treatment, the long-term follow-up or the prognosis. We believe in empowering patients because many will say that an empowered patient will get through the cancer pathway at a speedier rate and feel much more confident in the treatment they are receiving.
Answered by
Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1309
House
House of Lords