Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 March 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crime and Policing Bill.
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, I am sorry that the noble Lord did not give way, because I wanted to ask him this question. In his first sentence, he managed to speak to the amendment before us. He then went off on a tangent. In relation to impact assessment, has he, like me and many others, received hundreds of emails with countless papers and briefings about the implications of this clause? Did he observe the Second Reading debate in your Lordship’s House, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick said, and the extensive debates in Committee and on Report? The issue is whether the House has had sufficient information on which to make a judgment. My argument is that we have. We have made a judgment. This is totally unnecessary. We should move on and invite the Front Benches to now wind up.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 854 c1528
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abortion Decriminalisation Enforcement Fines Internet Ofcom Intimate image abuse Impact assessments Social media Digital service providers
- Legislation
- Online Safety Act 2023
- Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-14 14:27:59 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-25/26032564000040
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-25/26032564000040
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-25/26032564000040