Proceeding contribution from Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 September 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [HL].
Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [HL]
My Lords, I will just comment on Amendment 5. The noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig, challenged the use of the word “right” during the pre-meeting we had in July. The idea here is that we relinquish the principle of having a right in favour of a “working arrangement”.
Of course, we all understand that rights in this context can never be absolute. The Minister made that comment in his response to questions raised in the meeting. But the protections that are afforded to regulars will give rise to some legal rights, as the Minister has said. These regulations give enlisted regulars the right to apply for part-time working or geographically restricted service. Refusal of that request will give rise to a right of appeal. To my mind, the meaning of that is absolutely clear. I suggest to the Committee that this should not be fudged.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 783 c73GC
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Armed forces Flexible working Part-time employment
- Legislation
- Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill (HL) 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2021-10-12 15:02:08 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-09-12/17091238000024
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-09-12/17091238000024
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-09-12/17091238000024