Proceeding contribution from Keir Starmer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 April 2026. It occurred during Ministerial statement and Speaker's statement on Security Vetting.
Security Vetting
With respect, I do not agree with the hon. Gentleman’s analysis. I certainly agree that the information that is provided into the process by the applicant has to be protected; as anybody who has been through the process will know, it is incredibly detailed and intrusive, and it is very important that individuals give full and truthful accounts for all the questions they are asked. That is why that information needs to be protected. I do not accept that that means that the recommendation of UKSV cannot be shared with Ministers, including the Prime Minister. I think there is a distinction between the two; I accept the first, but I utterly reject the second.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 784 c41
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Diplomatic service National security Public appointments Parliamentary scrutiny Mandelson, Lord Vetting USA Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office United Kingdom Security Vetting
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-06-18 15:57:23 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-20/26042021000085
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-20/26042021000085
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-20/26042021000085