Proceeding contribution from Josh MacAlister (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 7 March 2025. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill.
Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill
I thank my hon. Friend for that important question. Most countries landed on the age of 13 as a result of a protracted negotiation in the US Senate about data and online safety many years ago. That policy was not based on evidence; it was based on the compromise of a committee in another country. We must base such decisions on evidence, and there was no firm evidence for picking 13 over any other age.
Alarm bells on the question of data and consent are already ringing. Just this week, the Information Commissioner announced an investigation into how TikTok uses the personal information of 13 to 17-year-olds in order to make recommendations to them. Changing the digital age of consent would give parents more control over who accesses their children’s data, and it would dumb down the powerful algorithms that feed children addictive content.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 763 cc481-2
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Data protection Internet Protection Mental health Safety Schools Social media Age assurance
- Legislation
- Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-06-24 12:24:47 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-03-07/2503071000122
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-03-07/2503071000122
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-03-07/2503071000122