Proceeding contribution from James Cartlidge (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 19 April 2023. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No. 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
As I have said, I respect the hon. Lady’s position, but the point is that if we were to have no further investment, the North Sea Transition Authority estimates that we would lose about 1.5 billion barrels-worth of output. There is no realistic estimate that we would not use an equivalent amount. In other words, we would simply import it, and if we import gas, that means 50% more emissions. Most importantly—and I feel very strongly about this—we would undermine our energy security. Even yesterday, representatives of the Kremlin were still talking about weaponising energy. If we have learned one thing, surely it is that we have to be realistic and pragmatic. We want to support the UK economy. Above all, we have a balanced approach. We are on the journey to net zero. We have cut our emissions more than any other country in the G7, and we continue to back renewables.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c322
- Session
- 2022-23
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Customs and Excise Beer Doctors Investment Electricity generation NHS Workplace pensions Public houses Renewable energy Taxation Spirits
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2022-23
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-06-23 09:22:28 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-19/23041951001097
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-19/23041951001097
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-19/23041951001097