Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Damian Hinds (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 June 2022. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Security Bill.


National Security Bill

My right hon. and learned Friend anticipates my next point to some extent. In instances where an individual has operated in good faith in compliance with domestic and international law and all proper process, they would then not face the risk of liability under the 2007 Act for something they could not have foreseen. In effect, we are adding greater certainty and specificity to an existing defence—the reasonable defence contained within that Act—by detailing scenarios where the offence will not apply, whereas the current defence is untested and imprecise.

The amendment means that, where an individual is working properly on behalf of our intelligence and security services and armed forces with an international partner to protect national security, they do not personally risk criminal liability if their work is later found to have been capable of contributing to unlawful activity in a way they would not have intended. That risk should remain with the Government, the services and the armed forces at corporate level, and that is what this amendment seeks to ensure.

A number of colleagues have raised the question of disinformation. They are correct that information operations are now a firm feature in the set of devices available to hostile states. There is direct disinformation, where talking points are put out on those states, on foreign affairs or on our domestic politics and society, but there is also the terrible technique of indirect disinformation, which is not necessarily intended to make anybody believe a particular line or narrative, but is simply aimed at causing division and discord in our country, to undermine our democracy and the cohesion of our society.

This Bill deals with people who carry out disinformation for a foreign state, but I want to be clear that legislation on the material itself belongs in the Online Safety Bill. We are looking at how to amend that Bill to account for disinformation material where that disinformation amounts to foreign interference, so that it can be treated as illegal material.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
715 cc637-8 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Damages Australia Canada Elections Intelligence services Legal aid scheme Liability Intelligence and Security Committee Law Commission Foreign companies National security Public interest Members Parliamentary scrutiny New Zealand Sentencing Registration Terrorism Trade USA Treason Rendition Espionage Freedom of association Special forces Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation Subversion Social media Disinformation
Legislation
Serious Crime Act 2007
Official Secrets Act 1989
Counter-terrorism and Border Security Act 2019
National Security Bill 2022-23
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk