Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 July 2016. It occurred during Debate on Report of the Iraq Inquiry.
Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Obviously, John Chilcot’s report is masterful in its description of the formal records and the detail, and in the lessons he very wisely draws. However, will the Foreign Secretary, as a politician, look at the political context for a moment? Does he agree that the background was clearly that the Americans and the Blair Government wished to invade Iraq to change the regime and get rid of Saddam Hussein? However, that would have been illegal regime change, so what my right hon. Friend has just gone through—people’s desperate desire to find evidence and to persuade themselves that there were weapons of mass destruction, that Saddam was not co-operating with the inspectors, that there was a risk of terrorism and so on—was mainly, and no doubt subconsciously, motivated by a desire to give the Attorney General some basis on which he could say that this action was legal?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 613 c320
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Armed forces Defence equipment Evidence Intelligence services USA Iraq Committee of Inquiry Iraq conflict Military intervention UN Security Council Weapons of mass destruction
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-08-30 10:15:42 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-13/16071333000038
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-13/16071333000038
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-13/16071333000038