Proceeding contribution from Lord Beamish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 February 2013. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Maritime Surveillance.
Maritime Surveillance
I am not surprised at that. I have dealt with the Treasury myself when in the Ministry of Defence. The current Secretary of State is doing the Treasury’s bidding, no doubt. What I am about to say might sound strange: at least the right hon. Member for North Somerset
(Dr Fox), the former Secretary of State, actually argued for defence and got into disagreements. To be fair to him, he tried his best on that decision. The whole problem with the SDSR was that it put the Treasury in the driving seat. My experience of dealing with Treasury officials about our budget when I was a Minister was that they had limited knowledge and understanding of how defence works in practice. That is one of the weaknesses: letting the lion into the room, with very little understanding of how defence works.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 558 c188WH
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Defence Procurement Navy Military aircraft Surveillance Shipping Seas and oceans Merlin helicopters Nimrod aircraft Sea King helicopters Strategic Defence and Security Review ISTAR
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-08-31 10:15:49 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-07/13020763000223
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-07/13020763000223
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-07/13020763000223