Proceeding contribution from Philip Davies (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 31 January 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Canterbury City Council Bill.
Canterbury City Council Bill
I have much sympathy with my hon. Friend’s point, but were we to remove “on its internet website”, how does he imagine that the information either would or should be published ?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 557 c1093
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Fixed penalties EU law Leeds Local government Powers Nottingham Reading (Berkshire) Street trading Seized articles Canterbury
- Legislation
- Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Leeds City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Nottingham City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Reading Borough Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-20 10:16:09 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-31/13013128000445
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-31/13013128000445
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-31/13013128000445