Proceeding contribution from Lord Grantchester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill [HL].
Energy Bill [HL]
I thank the noble Baroness for seeking that extra clarification. In this clause we are assuming that in a situation where a tenant is holding out against the wishes of every other tenant in a block, he would be required to undertake the improvements as part of the Green Deal. The costs arising would not land on the local authority. The tenant that was proving to be the roadblock would be entered under the Green Deal and would make payments under that deal. I think that this provision is set out in Clause 37.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 724 c171-2GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Costs Conservation Apprentices Enforcement Energy Fuel poverty Landlords Local government Powers Private rented housing Standards Training Repairs and maintenance Tenants Terminology Reviews Tied housing Green deal scheme Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:53:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_705022
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_705022
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_705022