Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that answer. The amendment is tabled to try and make quality partnerships work better. Perhaps we have not always got the wording right but we prefer quality partnerships over quality contracts. The intention behind this amendment was to try and make them more effective. As the Minister and everyone else knows, I am involved every single day of my life in local government and we sit round the table trying to sort things out and get some agreement with outside partners more often now than ever before. This amendment was intended to try and make things work rather better with bus operators. I do not think the Minister has quite acknowledged that. It is time we had a bit of exercise so I would like to test the feeling of the House on this issue. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 2C) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 100; Not-Contents, 171.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1307 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Conditions of employment Contracts Bus services Advertising Competition Grants Local government Planning authorities Pensions Public transport Railways Passenger transport executives Taxis Standards Transport Roads Traffic Commissioners Transport Tribunal Local transport plans
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Transport Act 1985
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk