Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 February 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Al-Yamamah Arms Agreement.


Al-Yamamah Arms Agreement

May I take my hon. and learned Friend back to when he referred to the Attorney-General coming to the decision that the investigation was going nowhere? The SFO was investigating under the law that the Government tightened in 2002. Does he share my surprise at the position of the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable)? The hon. Gentleman said that British Aerospace openly said, β€œβ€œYes, we paid, but it was to the Saudi Government. It was all out in the open,”” and he said that everything in Saudi Arabia is in the public domain. Does that approach not suggest that, after two and half years, the investigation was going nowhere, because everything was out in the open and there had been no prosecution brought in this country, and that the investigation was just dragging on and going nowhere?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
456 c877 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Contracts Air traffic control Corruption Arms trade Ministry of Defence Terrorism Serious Fraud Office USA Saudi Arabia Committee of Public Accounts al Qaeda Tanzania BAE Systems
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk