Proceeding contribution from Earl Peel (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 January 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Perhaps I may intervene. I had no intention of doing so. I entirely accept what my noble friend Lord Dixon-Smith and, indeed, the noble Lord, Lord Carter, said. Natural England, as I think many of us said at Second Reading, is a pretty unsatisfactory and rather daft name. I cannot for the life of me—maybe I am missing a trick here—see how adding the word ““executive”” or ““commission”” to it will in any way soften the implication of that rather unsatisfactory term.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c1095
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Departmental responsibilities Finance Environment protection Functions Local government Pay Membership Public appointments Pensions Staff Non-departmental public bodies English Nature Regulation Sustainable development Rural areas Rules of procedure Countryside Agency Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:27:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294213
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294213
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294213